Policy 007: Academic Integrity & Misconduct

Policy 007: ACADEMIC INTEGRITY & MISCONDUCT

 

1 Introduction

 

1.1 The Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) is committed to operating in an ethical way in every area to ensure the highest possible standards of decision-making and accountability. 

 

1.2 ACM believes it is essential for students to develop a professional and ethically-informed skill-set based on the fundamental values of trust, honesty and integrity. This is because being able to work in a professional and ethical way is a highly valued graduate attribute. As part of this development it is fundamental that our students know how to learn from and acknowledge others’ work in the process of creating their own unique pieces of work – and to be truthful about their own contribution. 

 

1.3 ACM recognises that academic integrity is a set of learned skills, with honesty, fairness and respect for others and their work at the core. ACM will support and guide students to learn the necessary skills through education and reinforcement of learning, the promotion of core values, policies that enable, and the appropriate use of technology. 

 

1.4 In order to demonstrate academic integrity, students must produce their own work, acknowledging explicitly any material that has been included from other sources or legitimate collaboration. Students must also present their own findings, conclusions or data based on appropriate and ethical practice. 

 

1.5 It is a student’s responsibility to familiarise themself with the academic conventions and practices applicable to the course on which they are registered. It will be the responsibility of students to ensure that the work they submit for assessment is entirely their own, or, in the case of group work, the group’s own, and that they observe all Regulations, Procedures and instructions governing assessments. 

 

1.6 Students are expected to protect the integrity of their work and not allow others to see the text they have produced for their assignments except in official group work. They should exercise caution about sharing their ideas and draft copies with other students. They should not allow others access to electronic versions of their work and should always be able to demonstrate that the work is their own and correctly sourced and referenced. 

 

1.7 It is the responsibility of each individual student when submitting an assessment item to ensure that the work which they are submitting is the work which they wish to be assessed. 

 

1.8 Students must have ethical approval for their project/critical review/ dissertation, which cannot be gained retrospectively. Failure to do so may result in failure of the work. Refer to ACM’s Research Ethics Policy for details regarding requirements for ethical approval. 

 

1.9 Academic misconduct is a breach of the values of academic integrity and can occur when a student cheats in an assessment or attempts to deliberately mislead an assessor that the work presented is their own when it is not. It includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism, commissioning or buying work from a third party or copying the work of others, unauthorised and/or unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence in a piece of work submitted for grading. 

 

1.10 If a third party or anonymous whistleblower reports that there has been academic misconduct by a student of ACM, ACM may decide to investigate the allegations. 

 

1.11 ACM will take action against any student who breaches the regulations surrounding academic integrity through negligence, foolishness or deliberate intent in any form of assessment. 

 

1.12 This policy and procedure is concerned with the actions of students and not their intentions. An excuse of “not intending to” is not an acceptable defence. 

 

1.13 In all cases of alleged academic misconduct and cheating, students will be treated as innocent until a case against them has been investigated and upheld. 

 

1.14 A finding that academic misconduct has occurred is a judgement based on available evidence, the standard of proof being the balance of probability. 

 

1.15 These Procedures should be read in conjunction with the Student Terms and Conditions  – (Section 7) for Academic Integrity. 

 

2 Aims and Purpose 

 

2.1 This policy is designed to support staff and students to embed good practice and develop methods for enhancing Academic Integrity. Its aims are to:

 

  1. a) ensure fair and equal treatment of all students when considering whether academic integrity has been breached.

 

  1. b) make clear the types of behaviours that are considered to be academic misconduct. 

 

  1. c) set out the penalties for academic misconduct and cheating.

 

  1. d) describe the procedures by which allegations of academic misconduct and cheating will be investigated and determined.

 

  1. e) create a culture of enhancement, seeking to learn from cases of academic misconduct.

 

  1. f) uphold fairness, consistency and natural justice in the treatment of the student body as a whole. 

2.2 ACM provides unlimited storage in Google Drive to every student. Students are required to utilise this as a composition space in which to create, draft and store their work. The purpose of this is to enable students to demonstrate academic integrity and to show evidence of their learning.

2.3 When requested, students are required to share the version history of their work. The purpose of this is to verify the writing process (or equivalent) and the history of document creation, and to ensure that all students meet ACM’s academic integrity standards. Being able to show how your drafts led to the finished work is a positive way of working with the academic integrity process.

 

3 Principles 

 

3.1 The following principles underpin ACM’s approach to Academic Integrity: 

 

  1. a) ACM treats the decision as to whether minor errors, poor academic practice or unfair and/or dishonest academic misconduct has taken place as a matter for academic judgement and the penalties applied will vary according to the individual case and the seriousness of the offence. 

 

  1. b) This policy and procedure applies to all work submitted for the Foundation year and / or Undergraduate and Postgraduate degree programmes and will include all assessment items, including research proposals and theses. 

 

  1. c) Cases of plagiarism at all levels due to poor referencing, paraphrasing and unintentional mistakes in the form and frequency of citations in text, where deception does not appear to be the intention, will be considered as Poor Academic Practice and marked accordingly. 

 

  1. d) ACM recognises that undergraduate students who are new to Higher Education (for example, Foundation year students and students at FHEQ Level 4  level) may need some time to learn how to acknowledge sources correctly. ACM’s response to signs of academic misconduct at FHEQ Level 4 will be to educate students in regard to appropriate academic practice and academic integrity rather than to penalise unacceptable academic practice. This applies to plagiarism, self-plagiarism and collusion (except collusion in an online examination) only. It does not apply to other forms of academic misconduct, including inappropriate use of artificial intelligence, where penalties will immediately apply. 

 

  1. e) If academic misconduct is suspected in relation to work submitted by a student, in the interest of helping students to avoid continued acts, cases should be investigated as soon as possible and normally start within 21 working days of submission of the work. However, ACM will exercise its own judgement in cases that come to its attention and reserves the right to investigate cases where academic misconduct appears to have taken place more than one month previously. 

 

  1. f) Cases of suspected academic misconduct should be evidenced and documented before the appropriate procedure is instigated. Where appropriate a Viva should be conducted to demonstrate the student’s understanding of the subject matter. 

 

  1. g) Students will receive notification from the marker that their work is under investigation for Academic Misconduct in place of a provisional grade for the work submitted. A Holding Grade of U will be recorded in the student record. 

 

4 Allegations of Academic Misconduct (Third party Reporting)

 

4.1 Third parties include: (i) students of ACM (current or former students) reporting misconduct by another student, or (ii) members of the public, or (iii) anonymous reporters. 

 

4.2 If a third party reports that academic misconduct has been committed by a student of ACM, ACM may decide to investigate the allegations, taking into account the nature of the academic misconduct, any evidence provided by the reporting third party and any other supporting evidence obtained from sources independent of the reporting third party. 

 

4.3 ACM will not (unless the law permits) report any details about the investigation undertaken and the outcome of the investigation to the reporting third party, as such information will include the personal information of other individuals including of the student who is being investigated, and such information must remain confidential to comply with Data Protection law and other duties of confidentiality that ACM may have in relation to the student being investigated and other individuals. 

 

4.4 If a reporting third party insists on remaining anonymous, ACM may not be able to rely on the anonymous information as evidence of academic misconduct, as under the data protection legislation and other legal rights that protect individuals faced with allegations against them, the accused person will have a right to know what information others hold about them and how they obtained such information, as this is information relating to them and is therefore their personal data. 

 

4.5 If a reporting third party consents to their identity being disclosed to the student who has allegedly committed academic misconduct, ACM may consider any precautionary measures that need to be put in place to safeguard the reporting person or anyone else involved, in consultation with the individuals to be safeguarded.

 

4.6 If ACM cannot investigate an anonymous report, we may use the information to better understand the issues impacting our community, to understand trends, and to inform proactive preventive work. 

 

5 Definitions of Types of Academic Misconduct

 

5.1 Academic misconduct (cheating and unethical practices) in assessments is where a student gains, seeks, attempts or intends to gain advantage in relation to assessments or to aid another to gain such an advantage by unfair or improper means. The following list provides examples of misconduct, but is not exhaustive. 

 

  1. a) Minor Errors/Poor Academic Practice 

Minor errors arise when a student has attempted to adopt academically acceptable practices but has failed to do so accurately or fully, producing work that is unduly derivative or which fails to recognise sources. Examples include forgetting to insert quotation marks, minor mistakes in referencing or citation, gaps in the bibliography or reference list, non- compliance with some aspects of presentation guidelines. Work will be marked down for an over-reliance on external sources or for being overly derivative.

 

  1. b) Cheating in examinations or tests 

Breaching the Examination Room Rules for Candidates (Section K). This includes assessments that are taken ‘in-class’, ‘online’ or any other form of summative examination. 

 

  1. c) Collusion 

Collusion occurs when, unless with official approval (e.g. in the case of group projects), two or more students consciously collaborate in the preparation and production of work which is ultimately submitted by each in an identical or substantially similar form and/or is represented by each to be the product of individual efforts. Examinations and Online timed assessments that contain similar work will be treated as collusion. Collusion also occurs where there is unauthorised co-operation between a student and another person in the preparation and production of work which is presented as the student’s own. This includes when one student produces work and allows another student to copy it – both students will be culpable. If both students submit the work in the same submission period, even at different times, both students will be deemed to have colluded.

 

Collusion can also be the act of one student presenting a piece of work as their own independent work when the work was undertaken by a group. With group work, where individual members submit parts of the total assignment, each member of a group must take responsibility for checking the legitimacy of the work submitted in their name. If even part of the work is found to contain academic misconduct, penalties will normally be imposed on all group members equally. 

 

Peer review of each other’s work or discussing an assignment can be helpful. However, students should be wary of falling into an act of collusion by actually producing/writing parts of an assignment for their peer/friend or giving them access to the work.

 

  1. d) Copying 

Copying occurs when a student consciously presents as their own work material copied directly from a fellow student or other person without their knowledge. It includes the passing off of another’s intellectual property, not in the public domain, as one’s own. It differs from collusion in that the originator of the copied work is not aware of, or party to, the copying. Copying of work from published sources would be dealt with as plagiarism.

 

  1. e) Dishonest Use of Data: Fabricating or falsifying data or using without permission another person’s work 

Fabricating or falsifying data to include presenting work that has not taken place. This includes laboratory reports or projects based on experimental or field work. It may also include falsifying attendance sheets for placements where this is part of the assessment requirements.

 

  1. f) Requirement for Ethical Approval 

Failure to gain ethical approval through ACM’s ethical approval processes prior to beginning research, or where the student makes a major deviation from any approved research without gaining additional ethical approval, may result in failure of the work. Refer to ACM’s Research Ethics Policy for details regarding requirements for ethical approval.

 

  1. g) False declarations 

False declarations and evidence presented in order to receive special consideration by Assessment Boards, including extensions, deferrals and requests for exemption from work. False declarations may be handled under ACM’s Student Conduct and Disciplinary procedure. It will be made clear to students where this is the case. 

 

  1. h) Plagiarism – Passing off someone else’s work, whether intentionally or unintentionally, as your own 

Plagiarism occurs when a student misrepresents, as their own work, work in the public domain, written or otherwise, of any other person (including another student) or of any institution. Examples of forms of plagiarism include:

 

  1. i) the verbatim (word for word) copying of another’s work without appropriate and correctly presented acknowledgement and citation of the source. 

 

  1. ii) the close paraphrasing of another’s work by simply changing a few words or altering the order of presentation, without appropriate and correctly presented acknowledgement and citation of the source.

 

  • Sham Paraphrasing: When someone copies text, word for word from a source, references the work but does not place it in quotation marks so it appears to be paraphrased.  
  • Illicit paraphrasing: When someone paraphrases text from a source but does not acknowledge the source.

 

iii) failure to reference appropriately or to adequately identify the source of material used:

 

  • Concealing sources: If a student cites a piece of work from a source more than once they must reference it each time. No matter how many times they refer back to the source they must acknowledge the source, even if it is in the very next paragraph.
  • Fake Referencing: To make up quotations and/or supply false/inaccurate quotations and/or citations, including references/sources, or any part thereof. The fake citation can be either completely fabricated or reference a real source (book, journal, or website) which contains no such article or words that have supposedly been used or to imply that books and/or journals have been used by copying citations from the work of other authors when they have not.  
  • Secondary referencing: To mention someone’s work which has been referred to in a document a student has read, even though the student hasn’t read the original piece of work themselves. When a student compiles their reference list students must only include the document(s) read by the student.

 

  1. iv) the deliberate and detailed presentation of another’s concept as one’s own.

 

  1. i) Self-plagiarism 

Self-plagiarism, also called auto-plagiarism, is when a student submits the same piece of work, or substantial part thereof, for assessment more than once for graded credit without acknowledging what they are doing by citing the original content. It will be regarded as Self-plagiarism unless the original piece of work is appropriately referenced in the new submission. 

 

  1. j) Purchasing or Commissioning 

Purchasing or commissioning is either attempting to purchase or purchasing work for an assessment including, for example, from the internet, or attempting to commission, or commissioning someone else to complete an assessment. Essay mills are now illegal entities, and use of them is facilitating an illegal activity. 

 

For assessments at all levels, the commissioning of proof-reading where this substantially alters the content of the original work, whether this is from a commercial provider or a personal contact, falls under this definition and is considered academic misconduct. 

 

  1. k) Deliberate attempt to gain advantage by unfair or improper means

Trying to deceive specialist text checking software (e.g. Turnitin) by, for example, using text replacement tools, images in documents instead of text, submitting documents in an alternative format than that stipulated by the assessor/assessment brief.

 

  1. l) Unethical Use of Artificial Intelligence 

Unethical use of artificial intelligence in a piece of work submitted for grading. Content generated by artificial intelligence which is not cited or referenced, giving the impression that the content is the student’s own original work. 

 

6 Appropriate Academic Conduct 

 

6.1 Academic Staff are responsible for informing students: 

 

  1. a) Students are only permitted to submit their own original work for assessments. 

 

  1. b) Students should not allow others to see the text they have produced for their assignments and should exercise caution about sharing their ideas and draft copies with other students.

 

  1. c) Students should not allow others access to electronic versions of their work. 

 

  1. d) Students should take care to ensure the originality of their own assessment submissions and should always be able to demonstrate that work is their own and correctly sourced and referenced, including declarations of where and how AI was used, where necessary. 

 

Procedures 

 

7 Initial Procedures 

 

7.1 Whilst an investigation is being carried out, the Assessment Board may note the incident and defer judgement. 

 

7.2 A holding grade of U (allegation of academic misconduct under investigation) should be entered by the Assessment Operations Manager or nominee on the student’s module record (for cross-reference with other alleged infringements). 

 

8 Procedure for investigation by the Academic Misconduct Team

 

8.1 Where a tutor suspects academic misconduct to have occurred, the tutor flags the submitted work to the Academic Misconduct Team for review. 

 

8.2 An Academic Misconduct Team member determines whether there are reasonable grounds to pursue an allegation of academic misconduct or whether the work referred to them should be treated as a case of Poor Academic Practice. 

 

8.3 Where there are no reasonable grounds to pursue an allegation of academic misconduct, the work should be returned to the tutor and marked on its academic merits. All record of the alleged misconduct will be removed from the student’s record. 

 

8.4 Where the work should be treated as a case of Poor Academic Practice, the work should be returned to the tutor and marked on its academic merits, taking into account the nature of the poor academic practice, such as (for example) an over-reliance on external sources. The student should be given feedback on where they can seek help (e.g. Digital Librarian) or where to access resources with regard to referencing, etc. 

 

8.5 If the Academic Misconduct Team determines there are reasonable grounds to suggest the candidate has contravened the regulations in assessment, they or a nominated tutor shall write to the student(s) concerned: 

 

(a) To put the allegation to the student. 

(b) If appropriate, to enclose copies of any evidence or report. 

(c) Request a written statement to explain how the allegation may have arisen, stating any mitigating circumstances which may be taken into account when considering a penalty (authenticated evidence to be provided where appropriate). 

(d) To notify the student that they may request a meeting in preference to submitting a written statement, if they prefer.

(d) To request a reply within 10 days of the date on which the letter or email is sent and explaining the consequences of failure to reply. 

 

Student Response

 

8.6 If a written reply to the allegation or a request for a meeting is not received from the student within 10 days of the date on which the letter or email is sent, or if the student replies accepting the allegation, the Academic Misconduct Team shall escalate the allegation to the Academic Misconduct Panel for consideration under the terms of this Academic Integrity Policy. 

 

9 Retrospective allegations of Academic Misconduct 

 

9.1 Exceptionally, where academic misconduct is discovered after a grade has been published or an award has been conferred, an allegation may be pursued retrospectively under these procedures. Where a student has already graduated, the outcome may result in the revoking of a qualification already awarded. 

 

10 Guidelines for Penalties for Academic Misconduct 

 

  1. a) The minimum penalty imposed shall normally exceed that which would follow if the student had merely failed the assessment. 

 

  1. b) The penalties listed must be taken as indicative of the maximum penalties which may be imposed (see Table A). 

 

  1. c) All confirmed offences for taught programmes must be recorded on the student’s record as grade P for the module. This grade to remain throughout the student’s registration at ACM and to be replaced on formal documents by grade 0%.

 

  1. d) All confirmed offences for research programmes will be recorded on the student record and remain throughout the student’s registration at ACM.  

 

  1. e) All records of disproved offences must be deleted from the student record. 

 

  1. f) A student may appeal against the decision of the Assessment Board to impose a penalty by following the Academic Appeals policy and procedure. 

 

  1. g) If a student submits multiple assessments within a similar timeframe (and will not have had the opportunity to have had feedback) and has committed the same type of offence, the appropriate penalty will be applied to all the assessments as a simultaneous offence.

 

11 Categories, Actions and Penalties

 

Table A

 

Penalty Examples Key Indicators  Actions
Category A


MINOR MISCONDUCT

  • Reproducing an existing concept or idea unintentionally
  • Failure to adequately reference sources at Level 4, including incomplete or incorrectly cited bibliographies, footnotes and/or quotations 
  • Several sentences of direct copying without acknowledging the source
  • Several instances of inappropriate or unacknowledged paraphrasing
  • Unacknowledged proofreading by another person 
  • Unacknowledged help with English language accuracy
  • The student has not yet learnt about the importance of referencing or has misunderstood the referencing or paraphrasing principles
  • The student’s behaviour appears unintentional
  • The student’s behaviour may be intentional but on an insignificant scale
  • The student is in their 1st year of university education 
  • The student is not used to UK academic culture 
  • Tutorial support and guidance to help the student understand what is and is not acceptable and
  • Written advice to the student on where they can seek help (such as the Digital Librarian)
  • Warning regarding penalties for academic misconduct offences 
Category B

MODERATE
MISCONDUCT

  • Several paragraphs of direct copying without acknowledging the source (including one’s own previously submitted work on another assignment)
  • At any FHEQ level, references, research and/or in-text citations are found not to exist 
  • Failure to adequately reference sources at Level 5 and above, including incomplete or incorrectly cited bibliographies, footnotes and/or quotations 
  • Several paragraphs of unacknowledged paraphrasing of another person’s thoughts, ideas or text
  • An assignment that has been translated into English by another person
  • An assignment that has been edited by another person
  • Deliberately submitting the same piece of work for assessment for more than one assignment
  • Collusion
  • Repeated Minor Misconduct, particularly where the student has been previously reprimanded 
  • The student’s behaviour appears intentional but on a small scale
  • The student’s behaviour will not have a significant impact on their final award
  • Normally a mark of P at the module level with the opportunity to resubmit the affected component (where further attempts have not been exhausted). The resubmitted component will be capped at 40% on a passing grade
  • Where a student has already been given an opportunity to resubmit a failed component and all attempts at the module are exhausted, the Assessment Board will normally, subject to Programme Regulations, award P for the whole module with the opportunity to re-enrol in the module or an appropriate alternative with full fees applicable and subject to a cap of 40% on a passing grade
  • Warning that further breaches of academic integrity will have serious consequences for the student’s final qualification
Category C

SERIOUS

MISCONDUCT

  • Large sections of unacknowledged paraphrasing of another person’s ideas or text
  • Presentation of the work of other students without acknowledgement
  • Presentation of the work of commercial or industry practitioners without acknowledgement
  • At any FHEQ level, references, research and/or in-text citations are found not to exist 
  • Deliberate failure to  adequately reference sources at Level 5 or above, including incomplete or incorrectly cited bibliographies, footnotes and/or quotations 
  • Deliberate falsifying of data, or using another person’s work without permission
  • Breach of Examination Room rules
  • Conspiring or colluding with others to commit any of the above
  • Repeated Moderate and/or Serious Misconduct, particularly if the student has been previously reprimanded 
  • False declarations in order to receive special consideration by Assessment Boards, including deferrals and requests for exemption from work 
  • The student’s behaviour appears intentional and on a significant scale
  • The student has intended to deceive the person marking the work and/or undermine the integrity of the assessment 
  • The student would benefit significantly from the offence
  • The student’s behaviour would significantly affect the integrity of the university’s awards
  • The student may have been warned/reprimanded for previous attempts to deceive
  • Normally a mark of P at the module level with the opportunity to resubmit the affected component (where further attempts have not been exhausted). The resubmitted component will be capped at 40% on a passing grade
  • Where a student has already been given an opportunity to resubmit a failed component and all attempts are exhausted, the Assessment Board will normally, subject to Programme Regulations, award P for the whole module with the opportunity to re-enrol in the module or an appropriate alternative with full fees applicable and subject to a cap of 40% on a passing grade

Or, in cases of the most serious misconduct

  • All modules at that level/stage will be marked with a P with an opportunity to re-enrol in that level/stage. All re-enrolled modules will be capped at 40% on a passing grade and full fees will be applicable
  • Exceptionally, the Assessment Board may, at its discretion and with reasonable cause, decide that a student may not be reassessed 
Category D

GROSS 

MISCONDUCT

  • Submitting an assignment purchased or downloaded from the internet (e.g. the use of the services of an essay mill) 
  • Commissioning another person to produce a piece of work
  • Theft of the work of another/other student(s)
  • Theft of the work of commercial or industry practitioners
  • Copyright/Intellectual Property Theft
  • Fraud or deception, including impersonation and misrepresentation of identity
  • Acts of violence or vandalism
  • Breach of Examination Room Rules
  • Repeated Serious Misconduct, particularly if the student has been previously reprimanded 
  • Any offence in which the student commits physical violence, malicious abuse, theft, fraud or other fundamental breach of trust, including substantial plagiarism in a postgraduate dissertation, purchasing or commissioning of work, will be regarded as gross misconduct and may therefore lead to deregistration from the programme. See also the Student Conduct and Discipline Policy 
  • A mark of P at the module level with a re-enrolment in the module, capped at 40% on a passing grade and with full fees applicable OR
  • A lower level award OR
  • Deregistration from the programme 
  • Revoking a previously awarded qualification 

 

Note: All cases will sit on a sliding scale of severity. There may be situations where what would normally be considered a minor offence will more appropriately be considered as serious misconduct, due, for example, to the extent of the deliberation and intention to deceive. These examples should therefore be used as a guide to help the relevant stakeholders identify procedures, keeping in mind that an element of academic judgement will always be required in determining the level of academic misconduct and the appropriate action to take. 

 

12 Fee and delivery implications

 

12.1 Requirement to re-enrol in a module or a substitute module may incur additional fees and possible disruption to the student’s original delivery schedule. Interruption to, or deregistration from, enrolment to the programme of study may also incur issues with regard to student loan access and/or funding. Students should refer to the Finance Policy for details regarding fee liability, available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

 

13 Appeals

13.1 If a student wishes to appeal a decision made by ACM regarding academic integrity, they should follow ACM’s Academic Appeals policy and procedure, available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

 

14 Policy Document Responsible Parties

 

14.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of this policy in liaison with the Policy Review Committee. The Academic Integrity & Misconduct policy lead is: 

 

  • Head of Assessments 

 

14.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the following designated staff: 

 

  • Head of Quality and Standards 
  • Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager 
  • Executive Dean of Education
  • Dean of Academic Practice and Enhancement
  • Head of Assessments

 

15 References 

 

15.1 Internal references: 

 

  • Academic Appeals Policy and Procedure
  • Research Ethics Policy
  • Finance Policy 
  • Student Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy 

 

15.2 External references: 

 

  • Office for Students (OfS): Regulatory Framework for Higher Education in England 
  • OfS Conditions B1 to B6 
  • Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) Good Practice Frameworks

 

16 Date of Approval and Next Review 

 

Version: 1.8
Approved on: 01 September 2025
Approved by: Student Experience and Opportunity Board
Next Review: August 2026

Download this policy: POL007_Academic Integrity & Misconduct_2025-26

Policy 008: Equality and Diversity

Policy 008: Equality and Diversity

1. Purpose and Scope

1.1. This policy describes the way in which ACM approaches matters relating to student and staff equality and diversity.

1.2. This policy outlines the steps taken to ensure due consideration is taken to the embedding of a culture at ACM which is sensitive, inclusive and mindful of its stakeholders differing needs and expectations in relation to equality and diversity.

2. Policy Statement

Equality and Diversity

2.1. The Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) aims to ensure that no one is treated less favourably than another on the grounds of gender, race, nationality, ethnic or national origin, religious or political beliefs, disability, marital status, social background, family circumstance, sexual orientation, gender reassignment, spent criminal convictions, age or for any other unlawful reason.

2.2 ACM recognises and encourages the valuable and enriching contribution of all who work within ACM and the rights of all individuals who come into contact with ACM, such as prospective students and other stakeholders.

2.3 This policy provides ACM’s overarching vision, values and commitments in relation to equality and diversity. It has been written to reflect changes in equality legislation including the Equality Act 2010.

2.4 At ACM we are committed to advancing equality of opportunity, respecting and celebrating differences, eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation and fostering good relations between all who work or learn at ACM, or use our services. We recognise that all have a right to equality of opportunity regardless of the nine characteristics covered by the Act:

  • Race
  • Disability
  • Gender
  • Age
  • Sexual Orientation
  • Religion and belief
  • Gender Reassignment
  • Pregnancy/maternity
  • Marriage/civil partnership

2.5 Other aspects of a person’s identity, background or circumstances can cause them to experience discrimination, for example a person’s socio economic status, class or background. ACM is committed to advancing equality and eliminating discrimination on these and other grounds. 

The Student Experience

2.6 ACM  is committed to:

  • Ensuring and promoting equality through teaching and learning, and also in the selection, enrolment, assessment and progression of students.
  • Providing appropriate student support and guidance which reflects the diversity of students’ needs both pre-entry and on-course. This means that no student will receive less favourable treatment on the basis of their protected characteristics.
  • Support and guidance for students will be linked to their particular needs. It also means that ACM aims to promote equal respect for all people, to challenge prejudice and to prepare students to work in a multicultural and diverse society.
  • Ensuring equality of opportunity for all under-represented groups of students through an up to date and regularly reviewed Access and Participation Plan (APP) 

Principles

2.7 This Policy is underpinned by principles to which all ACM students and stakeholders should adhere, namely:

  • To create an environment in which individual differences and the contributions of all our staff and students are recognised and valued.
  • That successful implementation of the Policy is the responsibility of all ACM students and stakeholders.
  • That all students and other stakeholders of ACM will be treated with fairness, respect and sensitivity.
  • To aim to create and maintain a working and learning environment where all stakeholders will have the opportunity to fully participate in order to achieve their full potential in a climate free from discrimination, bullying or harassment.

2.8 Breaches of this Policy will be regarded as misconduct and could lead to disciplinary proceedings.

2.9 The Equality Act recognises the following types of discrimination:

  • Direct discrimination, including associative and perception of discrimination.
  • Indirect discrimination
  • Harassment
  • Victimisation
  • Discrimination arising from disability
  • Failure to make reasonable adjustments

2.10 This policy applies to all students and visitors to ACM. Where students are working at premises other than ACM locations, they will be subject to the policy.

2.11 This policy covers all behaviour by the individual including online platforms such as the Virtual Learning Environment, email, communications channels, distribution media and platforms and across any social media.

Implementation

2.12 The Equality Act 2010 introduced a Public Sector Equality Duty, in force from April 2010, which requires ACM to give due regard to:

  • Eliminating discrimination, harassment or victimisation.
  • Advancing equality of opportunity.
  • Fostering good relations.

2.13 Implementation of this policy is managed via ACM, School and Department plans which will take account of ACM’s commitment to Equality and Diversity and seek to implement its provisions.

2.14 ACM will ensure that its strategic plan has a commitment to equality and diversity; that they receive and review reports on student equality, diversity and widening participation, that they agree relevant equality targets and impact measures and monitor progress towards these.

2.15 The Senior Management Team will take an active and visible lead in driving forward equality and diversity; provide reports; oversee implementation of this policy; ensure equality and diversity data is embedded within self-assessment reports and development plans and agree quality targets with managers.

Monitoring

2.16 The effectiveness of this policy in ensuring we are meeting our obligations will be monitored through regular collection and analysis of data that should be as unobtrusive to individuals as possible, commensurate with this objective.

2.17 ACM monitoring of the implementation and effectiveness of the Policy will be the responsibility of the Senior Management Team. Departments will be responsible for the gathering and analysis of data as required in line with cyclical reporting. Outcomes from analysis of information collated will inform self assessment processes and ACM improvement plans.

Addressing Discrimination, Harassment and Victimisation

2.18  ACM will:

  • Actively challenge and tackle all forms of prejudice, discrimination and stereotypical attitudes.
  • Deal with allegations of discrimination, harassment and victimization sensitively, and investigate promptly, fairly and thoroughly.
  • Treat any form of discrimination, harassment or victimisation carried out by an individual as a matter for possible disciplinary action. This includes harassment by a third party.

Publicity

2.19 The Image ACM projects of itself in its promotional material, advertising and public relations activity, sends messages about the people ACM expects and wishes to serve. ACM’s publicity will be regularly reviewed to ensure that:

  • It is non-discriminatory to any group or individual
  • It is provided in hard copy and electronic forms to ensure that information is widely available and accessible by individuals with a range of needs.
  • It gives the positive image of a place which welcomes everyone for education and training.
  • Applications from members of disadvantaged or underrepresented groups are actively encouraged into areas where such groups might be underrepresented.

2.20  Every effort will be made to ensure that appropriate publicity reaches all groups in the community, enabling the widest possible recruitment.

2.21  All ACM students, and potential students, should be made aware of:

  • The available study support.
  • The services available within ACM to support students with additional learning needs.
  • ACM counselling and guidance services.
  • The availability of careers guidance and industry related opportunities and enrichment activities.

Student Recruitment

2.22 The process of gaining admission to ACM programmes will be clearly expressed and structured to allow, wherever possible, ease of access to all students throughout the year where appropriate. Prospective students will be offered support and guidance at all stages.

2.23 During the admissions process, students will be invited to indicate details relating to their ethnic origin, any additional learning needs and any special educational needs. This information will be used only for the purposes of providing support, for monitoring and as a reference when considering necessary modifications to the curriculum, marketing activities, buildings and equipment.

2.24 No ACM employee will discriminate unfairly, directly or indirectly in the guidance and recruitment of students.

2.25 Students with additional learning needs and special educational needs will be given the opportunity to discuss ways of overcoming any problems of access (in it’s widest sense, including access to the curriculum) and should be actively involved in problem solving.

Access to the Curriculum

2.26 ACM is an open access institution that seeks to offer learning opportunities to all, whatever their previous level of achievement.

2.27 Programme Handbooks, syllabi and resources will be regularly examined to ensure they do not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against any student group. They should be enhanced by including positive acknowledgement of the contributions made to society by a diversity of cultures.

2.28 Programmes should be accessible to as wide a range of students as possible, by enhanced flexibility in both delivery and timing.

2.29 Learning Support will be made available to all students requiring it, subject to resources.

2.30 Ways of modifying curriculum delivery to allow access to classes to individuals with additional learning needs or special educational needs should continue to be sought.

2.31 Assistive technologies will be developed and deployed to assist and enhance the participation of students with disabilities and impairments in their use of learning opportunities.

2.32 Learning opportunities will be provided for targeted groups to facilitate access and opportunity.

2.33 Procedures for accreditation and assessment will, wherever practicable, be flexible and responsive to the needs of the whole range of students who attend ACM.

2.34 ACM supports the entitlement, for the whole ACM community, to information, guidance and counselling, which will enable individuals to manage their personal development.

Equality and Diversity related concerns

2.35 Any student, customer or client who feels she/he is being discriminated against for reason of disability, gender, ethnic origin, age, socio-economic group or sexual orientation should raise the matter formally or informally, as appropriate, with one of the following, in the first instance:

  • Their Pathway Leader
  • Dean of Education
  • Head Education Delivery and Development
  • Head of Student Services
  • Academic Registrar
  • Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager

2.36 The Student Complaints and Grievance Procedure is available for cases of alleged discrimination against students.

2.37  All complaints will be taken seriously by the person receiving them and the appropriate process will be followed to respond to the complaint. Complaints provisions are subject to regular review under the Quality Assurance and Enhancement policy and procedures.

ACM Environment

2.38  By adapting and modifying the environment and facilities, where appropriate, ACM will strive to make students, staff, customers and visitors feel welcome.

2.39 Offensive material of a discriminatory nature will not be displayed in any part of ACM.

2.40 ACM communications and publication (internal and external) will not use language or images which are potentially discriminatory against any group or individual.

2.41 A facility will be made available, if required, to meet diverse religious needs.

2.42 ACM catering facilities will reflect the needs of and show sensitivity to different dietary needs.

2.43 ACM will comply with the requirements of all current legislation relating to the access rights of people with disabilities.

2.44 Consideration will continue to be given to the provision of off-site tuition, where appropriate, to the needs of disadvantaged groups.

3. Responsible Parties

3.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of the policy in liaison with the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager. The Equality and Diversity Policy lead is:

  • Head of Student Services

3.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the following designated staff:

  • Head of Student Services
  • Head of Diversity, Access and Participation
  • Senior Management Team
  • Education Management Team
  • Pathway Leaders
  • Staff with line management responsibilities

4. Reference Points

4.1 Internal:

  • Safeguarding Policy
  • Student Complaints and Grievances Policy
  • Student Conduct and Discipline Policy
  • Staff Disciplinary Policy
  • Data Protection Policy

4.2 External:

  • The Equality Act 2010

5. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                        1.2

Approved on:               01 September 2025

Approved by:               Academic Board

Next Review:                August  2026

Download POL_008_Equality And Diversity

Policy 009: Additional Needs and Disability

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: and@acm.ac.uk

Policy 009: Additional Needs and Disability

  1. PURPOSE

1.1 This Policy aims to ensure that ACM promotes and embodies the delivery of inclusive education across all it’s campuses, including Higher Education, Further Education and for all ACM students.

1.2 This Policy describes how the ACM meets the needs of students with additional needs and disabilities by:

  • Providing targeted and specialist support to those meeting evidential criteria to access funding for Further and Higher Education support.
  • Providing advice to students with an additional need during enrolment, on course and through progression.
  • Working collaboratively and proactively with parents/guardians/stakeholders by adopting a multi-disciplinary partnership approach.
  • Influencing organisational decisions ensuring adequate levels of inclusive practice and accessibility are considered.
  • Advocating for students who have a protected characteristic as recognised by the Equality Act.
  1. POLICY DETAILS

2.1 ACM is committed to the provision of equal opportunities for students with additional needs and disabilities, and aims to create an environment that enables them to participate fully in Further and/or Higher Education. It recognises its duties to make reasonable adjustments as described in Section 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010.

 

2.2 ACM recognises and embodies a social model of disability. That everyone who has the capability to benefit from studying at ACM should have the opportunity to do so: this is the principle that informs ACM’s approach to widening participation in a range of areas, including disability.

 

2.3 ACM takes positive steps to ensure that disabled students can fully participate in the education and other benefits, facilities and services provided for students. This duty is anticipatory and continuing.

 

2.4 To encourage an inclusive approach to disabled students, ACM need to respond appropriately ensuring that:

  • staff have appropriate training to review their own practices and adopt more inclusive learning, teaching and assessment approaches;
  • staff understand their duties to make reasonable adjustments;
  • staff are aware of the advice and support services for disabled students within ACM.

2.5 ACM does not deny admission to prospective students on the grounds of their disability and takes such steps as it is reasonable, within its means and capabilities, to avoid any disadvantage. In the event that ACM is not able to meet the needs of a particular student, alternatives will be discussed. Admission to the programme would be institutionally irresponsible if ACM is not able to make the necessary adjustments to ensure the well-being, safety and quality of experience for prospective students.

2.6 For all matters relating to this policy and inclusive practice please refer to the Additional Needs and Disability Department. They can be contacted via email on and@acm.ac.uk  or by telephone on 01483 501211.

  1. POLICY SCOPE

4.1 This policy applies to ACM students studying both Further Education and Higher Education. It is embodied in all three campuses and across the organisation as a whole.

4.2 It also recognises its responsibility to applicants, staff, visitors and contractors that may also have an additional need or disability.

  1. RELATED POLICIES

This policy is embedded across all organisational practices. All associated documents can be found on the ACM website under policies or by using the link. https://www.acm.ac.uk/policies/

Associated policies include:

  • 008 Equality and Diversity010 Safeguarding
  • 011 Fitness to Study
  • 012 Learning, Teaching, Assessment and Attainment
  • 013 Hardship and Travel Bursary Funding
  • 015 Admissions Policy
  • 020 Data Access and Protection
  • 046 Risk Assessment
  • 058 Student Withdrawal, Interruption and Internal Transfer
  • 067 Looked After Young People and Care Leavers

It also directly relates to ACM’s Access and Participation Strategy. This can be found on the ACM website via the link:

https://www.acm.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ACMGuildfordLtd_APP_2020-21_10067853.pdf

  1. POLICY OWNER

6.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Student Engagement and Quality Committee. The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework. The Student Engagement and Quality Committee delegates operational responsibility to the Additional Needs and Disability department. They can be contacted via email on and@acm.ac.uk  or by telephone on 01483 501 211.

  1. DEFINITIONS

7.1 Throughout this policy the term ‘Additional Needs and Disability’ is used to denote students with an identifiable additional need that may not be met by the core offer. It is interchangeable with the term ‘Special Educational Needs (SEN)’ and includes those with a learning disability, specific learning difficulty, mental health condition, health problem, physical/hidden impairment or a social care need.

  1. PROCEDURES

Admissions Arrangements

8.1 All applicants wishing to study at ACM complete an admission form that includes details of any additional need or disability. We encourage applicants to share information on any condition that may inhibit their ability to access their chosen course/job role.

8.2 All applicants who have made a disclosure will be referred to the Additional Needs and Disability Department (AND Department) who engage with the applicant to ensure that they are given information and advice about the support available.

8.3 Students who have declared an additional need or disability are assessed by the AND department. Depending on the age of the student, the course they are undertaking and their individual needs a recommended support plan is then put in place.

Specialist Support

8.4 Students that have an identifiable additional need or disability may be entitled to specialist support and/or equipment. It is the responsibility of the AND department to support students to apply for local and/or national funding.

8.5 Higher Education disabled students can apply for Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA). After they supply evidence of their disability they are invited to attend a Needs Assessment at a local Assessment Centre. The Assessor will write a report to outline what support is available.

8.6 Non Medical Help support includes Specialist Study Skills Tutors and Mentors.The Specialist Tutors are on the Association of Dyslexia Specialists in Higher Education (ADSHE) register, and the Specialist Mentor is accredited by the University Mental Health Advisors Network (UMHAN) ensuring they complete rigorous CPD and peer supervision. ACM offers remote study skills sessions and mentoring to all three campuses and face to face appointments in Guildford.

8.7 Students may also be entitled to assistive technology/software, printing costs, accommodation top ups and transport.

8.8 Further Education disabled students in receipt of an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) may be entitled to local authority funding. Learning Support Assistants and a Learning Support Officer may be allocated if required.

Facilities

8.9 The AND Department is located in ACM’s Guildford campus. It has a separate entrance to the main teaching areas so students can attend discreetly. The AND Department aims to have a calm and positive environment, where students feel welcome and comfortable. In Clapham and Birmingham students may access support via remote communication or on campus by appointment.

8.10 All areas in ACM buildings have disabled access and toilets. Where disabled access is not available ACM are committed to finding an alternative arrangement.

8.11 There is a no-food-or-drink policy in all teaching areas, enabling attendance of students at risk of anaphylaxis.

Allocation of resources

8.12 Students with an additional need or disability are either supported/advised by the Learning Support Officer (for Further Education) or Disability Officer (for Higher Education). Both roles sit within the Additional Needs and Disability department.

8.13 The Additional Needs and Disability Department is responsible for regulating and monitoring the allocation of resources.

Identification of needs

8.14 Students who declare their support needs, and satisfy data protection requirements, are identified to teaching staff through the Insight program, which flags the student’s name on the staff registers, enabling teaching staff to have instant access to the information entered. Staff are also advised when this information is updated.

8.15 Teaching staff may refer any student to the AND Department if they have concerns regarding the student’s support needs.

8.16 AND Department staff keep detailed records of support given to students and the progress made.

Access to the Curriculum

8.17 ACM takes positive steps to ensure that disabled students can fully participate in the education and other benefits, facilities and services provided for students.

8.18 This duty is anticipatory and continuing – ACM plans ahead and anticipates reasonable requirements of disabled students. This includes providing all documentation in a digital format and providing alternative forms of assessment as required.

Evaluating the success of provision

8.19 Records are kept of the attendance, retention and achievement of all students, including those with additional needs and disabilities.

Complaints

8.20 Complaints against ACM made by students are treated seriously and, if found to be valid, are acted upon to ensure that the students’ interests are protected as far as it is possible for ACM to do so.

8.21 Informal, and formal grievances can be made in accordance with the Student Complaints and Grievances Policy and Procedure. This can be found on the ACM website under policies or through the link https://www.acm.ac.uk/policies/

  1. EXHIBITS/APPENDICES/FORMS

There are no further exhibits, appendices or forms relevant to this Policy.

  1. SUPPORTING INFORMATION

There is no further supporting information relevant to this Policy.

  1. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW

Version:                         2.1

Approved on:               01 September 2025

Approved by:               Academic Board

Date of next review:    August 2026

Download 009 POL_009_Additional Needs and Disability

Policy 010: Safeguarding

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: anddegree@acm.ac.uk

Policy 010: SAFEGUARDING POLICY

1. PURPOSE

1.1 The purpose of the policy is to assist ACM in discharging its duties and commitments in respect of safeguarding students, staff and the wider community in institution-led activities fully, effectively and in accordance with statutory guidance and legislation. 

1.2 It is the intention of this Policy to promote high standards of personal and professional practice across the institution and outlines the procedures for staff to follow when concerns arise. 

1.3 This Policy has been written in accordance with, and with reference to, the statutory guidance and legislation as outlined in Item 8. 

2. POLICY DETAILS

2.1 The Academy of Contemporary Music is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of all students, staff, visitors and guests and acknowledges its particular responsibilities to children, young people and adults at risk. 

2.2 All staff within ACM have a responsibility to be involved in contributing to a culture in which safeguarding is embedded, discussed openly and risk proactively reduced. Every member of staff is DBS checked prior to commencing employment, and again every three years, and all staff members must complete training in the following areas: 

  • Safeguarding Young People
  • Mental Health Awareness in Children & Young People
  • An introduction to GDPR
  • Health and Safety in Education Awareness
  • The Prevent Duty
  • First Aid Essentials

2.3 All suspicions and allegations of abuse or concerns about radicalisation will be taken seriously by ACM and responded to appropriately involving referral to external agencies when deemed necessary. These suspicions and allegations will be acted upon immediately. 

2.4 ACM will ensure that there are established governance structures in place to ensure that all aspects relating to safeguarding are regularly audited, reviewed and monitored. 

2.5 All ACM students and staff are required to wear ID cards and lanyards at all times whilst on ACM premises. Any person or persons found to be on ACM premises without a valid ACM ID will be removed by security representatives. The main doors to ACM buildings are key card access only to ensure access is only granted to ACM students and staff, or supervised contractors. Any member of the ACM community found to be abusing this system (e.g. by granting access to another person by using their ID card), may be subject to staff or student disciplinary procedures. 

2.6 All visitors, guests and contractors etc. are required to register at the Campus Reception on arrival. They will be issued with, and must display at all times, a Visitor Pass and are required to return it on leaving the premises. A Safeguarding leaflet will also be issued which contains essential information for disclosure process, team information and also includes fire precautions and first aid information. 

2.7 All visitors, guests and contractors etc. will be made aware of and follow ACM’s safeguarding policy. They will recognise, respond to and report any concerns that come to their attention regarding the safety and/or welfare of a young person or vulnerable adult. 

2.8 ACM’s safeguarding policy and procedure are supported by the Safeguarding Team. The safeguarding team must remain aware of all safeguarding policies and procedures and be able to communicate them effectively to all staff. They are responsible for providing comprehensive safeguarding inductions, regular training and reinforcing staff responsibility to recognise, report and respond to concerns. 

2.9 The ACM safeguarding team consists of the Designated Safeguarding Lead and a team of Deputy Designated Safeguarding Leads, and is responsible for responding to safeguarding disclosures under the direction of the DSL. Such actions may include, referring allegations to the relevant investigating agencies such as Local authority , Police, Channel panel, social services; Attending Child In Need meetings and Child Protection conferences. 

2.10 ACM is committed to providing clear and easy to follow procedures for management of all concerns, including those that are deemed low level. In addition to its safeguarding provision, ACM has established procedures to enable staff to raise low level concerns about staff competency, organisational risk and reputational risk. 

2.11 Notwithstanding the measures in place to safeguard children and young people, and ACM’s commitment to students in need of extra support as outlined in Section 8 of the Additional Needs and Disability Policy, ACM does not act in loco parentis for registered students under 18. 

3. POLICY SCOPE

3.1 The policy applies to all members of the ACM community, including students at all levels and campuses, staff, applicants, associate members, visitors, contractors and volunteers. 

3.2 All ACM campuses have students under the age of 18 participating in courses or events, our safeguarding policy and training programme is developed in line with Keeping Children Safe in Education for both our Higher and Further Education provision. All staff adhere to recommendations and necessary requirements stated within this legislation regardless of role or position. 

4. RELATED POLICIES

  • Safeguarding Procedures 
  • Staff Code of Conduct 
  • Student Charter 
  • Data Protection Policy 
  • Prevent Policy 
  • External Speaker and Events Policy 
  • Acceptable Use of IT and E-Safety Policy 
  • Social Media Policy 
  • Student Disciplinary Policy 
  • Student Complaints and Grievances Policy 
  • Equality & Diversity Policy 
  • Staff Recruitment Policy 
  • Health & Safety Policy 
  • Whistleblowing Policy 
  • Criminal Convictions Policy 

5. POLICY OWNER

The responsibility for this Policy falls under the remit of the Safeguarding and Pastoral Services Manager, overseen by the Student Experience and Quality Committee. This role is supported under the Integrated Services Division. 

The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework.

6. DEFINITIONS

DSL: Designated Safeguarding Lead is the member of staff that coordinates all safeguarding concerns and oversees all referrals. 

DDSL: Deputy Designated Safeguarding Lead is the member of staff who supports the DSL in maintaining the function of safeguarding throughout all campuses. 

LADO: Local Authority Designated Officer 

ABUSE: A form of maltreatment of a person. Somebody may abuse or neglect another person by inflicting harm or by failing to act to prevent harm. Someone may be abused in a family or in an institutional or community setting by those known to them or, more rarely, by others. Abuse can take place either wholly online, or technology may be used to facilitate offline abuse. People may be abused by an adult or adults or by young people. 

PHYSICAL ABUSE: A form of abuse which may involve hitting, shaking, throwing, poisoning, burning or scalding, drowning, suffocating or otherwise causing physical harm to anyone. Physical harm may also be caused when a responsible adult fabricates the symptoms of, or deliberately induces, illness in someone. 

EMOTIONAL ABUSE: The persistent emotional maltreatment of a person such as to cause severe and adverse effects on that person’s emotional development. It may involve conveying to a person that they are worthless or unloved, inadequate, or valued only insofar as they meet the needs of another person. It may include not giving the person opportunities to express their views, deliberately silencing them or ‘making fun’ of what they say or how they communicate. It may feature age or developmentally inappropriate expectations being imposed on people. These may include interactions that are beyond a person’s developmental capability as well as overprotection and limitation of exploration and learning or preventing the person from participating in normal social interaction. It may involve seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another. It may involve serious bullying (including cyberbullying), causing people frequently to feel frightened or in danger, or the exploitation or corruption of people. Some level of emotional abuse is involved in all types of maltreatment of a child, although it may occur alone. 

SEXUAL ABUSE: Involves forcing or enticing someone to take part in sexual activities, not necessarily involving violence, whether or not the person is aware of what is happening. The activities may involve physical contact, including assault by penetration (for example rape or oral sex) or non-penetrative acts such as masturbation, kissing, rubbing, and touching outside of clothing. They may also include non-contact activities, such as involving someone in looking at, or in the production of, sexual images, watching sexual activities, encouraging people to behave in sexually inappropriate ways, or grooming someone in preparation for abuse. Sexual abuse can take place online, and technology can be used to facilitate offline abuse. Sexual abuse is not solely perpetrated by adult males. Women can also commit acts of sexual abuse, as can people under the age of 18. The sexual abuse of children by other children is a specific safeguarding issue (also known as peer on peer abuse) in education and all staff should be aware of it and ACM’s policy and procedure for dealing with it. 

NEGLECT: The persistent failure to meet someone’s basic physical and/or psychological needs, likely to result in the serious impairment of the person’s health or development. Neglect may occur during pregnancy, for example, as a result of maternal substance abuse. Once a child is born, neglect may involve a parent or carer failing to: provide adequate food, clothing and shelter (including exclusion from home or abandonment); protect a child from physical and emotional harm or danger; ensure adequate supervision (including the use of inadequate care-givers); or ensure access to appropriate medical care or treatment. It may also include neglect of, or unresponsiveness to, a child’s basic emotional needs. 

CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION (CSE) and CHILD CRIMINAL EXPLOITATION (CCE) Both CSE and CCE are forms of abuse and both occur where an individual or group takes advantage of an imbalance in power to coerce, manipulate or deceive a child into sexual or criminal activity in exchange for something the victim needs or wants, and/or for the financial advantage or increased status of the perpetrator or facilitator and/or through violence or the threat of violence. CSE and CCE can affect children, both male and female and can include children who have been moved (commonly referred to as trafficking) for the purpose of exploitation. 

SERIOUS VIOLENCE: Indicators may signal someone is at risk from or is involved with serious violent crime. These may include increased absence from education, a change in friendships or relationships with older individuals or groups, a significant decline in performance, signs of self-harm or a significant change in wellbeing, or signs of assault or unexplained injuries. Unexplained gifts or new possessions could also indicate that someone has been approached by, or are involved with, individuals associated with criminal networks or gangs and may be at risk of criminal exploitation. 

MENTAL HEALTH: Mental health problems can, in some cases, be an indicator that a person has suffered or is at risk of suffering abuse, neglect or exploitation. Only appropriately trained professionals should attempt to make a diagnosis of a mental health problem. ACM staff, however, are well placed to observe students day-to-day and identify those whose behaviour suggests that they may be experiencing a mental health problem or be at risk of developing one. 

FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM): FGM is a procedure where the female genitals are deliberately cut, injured or changed, even though there is no medical reason for this to be done. It is also referred to as female circumcision. If a member of staff, in the course of their work, discovers that an act of FGM appears to have been carried out, they must report this to the DSL or DDSL and it must be reported to the police. 

PEER ON PEER ABUSE: Children can abuse other children and it can happen inside or outside the institution and online. Even if there are no reports from within the institution, it does not mean it is not happening; it may be the case that it is just not being reported. It is therefore important if staff have any concerns, they should contact the Designated Safeguarding Lead or Deputy. Inappropriate behaviours between peers that are abusive in nature should be challenged. Downplaying certain behaviours, for example dismissing sexual harassment as “just banter”, “just having a laugh” can lead to a culture of unacceptable behaviours, an unsafe environment for people and in worst case scenarios a culture that normalises abuse leading to people accepting it as normal and not coming forward to report it. Peer on peer abuse is seen as a specific safeguarding concern. ACM therefore additionally covers peer on peer abuse in a separate policy and procedures document. 

7. PROCEDURES

The procedure that accompanies this safeguarding policy is Procedure 010: Safeguarding Procedure, and can be found at acm.ac.uk/policies

8. EXHIBITS/ APPENDICES/ FORMS

This Policy has been written in accordance with, and with reference to, the following statutory guidance and legislation: 

  • Keeping Children Safe in Education (DfE, 2022) 
  • Working Together to Safeguard Children (HM Government, 2018)
  • What to do if you’re worried a child is being abused (DfE, 2015)
  • The Prevent Duty (DfE, 2015, updated 2019) 
  • Child sexual exploitation; definition and guide for practitioners (DfE, 2017)
  • Sexual violence and harassment between children in schools and colleges (DfE, 2018) 
  • The Children Act 2004 (with later amendments) 
  • Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006
  • The Sexual Offences Act 2003
  • Office for Students (OfS) Condition E6
  • Guidance for English Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) (DIUS, 2007)
  • Protection of Freedoms Act 2012
  • Children and Families Act 2014
  • Care Act 2014 
  • Information sharing: advice for practitioners providing safeguarding services to children, young people, parents and carers (HM Government, July 2018) 

9. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

There are no further supporting documents to this Policy.

10. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW

Version:                       6.1

Approved on:             01 September 2025

Approved by:              Academic Board

Date of next review:  August 2026

Download: Policy 010_ SAFEGUARDING POLICY

Policy 011: Fitness to Study

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: and@acm.ac.uk 

Policy 011: FITNESS TO STUDY

  1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

1.1 This policy outlines how the Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) ensures that there is a consistent and supportive approach when assessing an individual’s capacity to satisfactorily participate and fully engage as an ACM student. 

1.2 This policy applies to all prospective students, applicants, and current students, and is designed to ensure that students are treated in a fair and equitable manner. 

1.3 The content of this policy aligns with government legislation, the regulations of ACM’s validating partners and other external stakeholders to whom ACM must make reference. 

  1. POLICY STATEMENT

Fitness to Study 

2.1 ‘Fitness to study’ refers to an individual’s capacity to participate fully and satisfactorily as a student, in relation to their academic studies and life generally at ACM. 

2.2 Capacity refers to an individual’s ability to make authoritative and objective decisions regarding their well-being or academic progress. Capacity refers to temporary or permanent impairment. 

2.3 ACM recognises that ensuring the mental and physical well-being of its students is crucial to their learning and academic achievement. ACM is committed to supporting and responding to student needs and to seeking to ensure a positive experience which assists students to engage with their studies and the local community. 

2.4 ACM is committed to the involvement of individual students in the management of their health, wellbeing, or exceptional personal circumstances and will work with them to make arrangements for support in order to break down any barriers to their education. 

2.5 There may be instances where a student’s health or well-being causes ACM concern regarding the student’s fitness to study on their programme/course. ACM has a duty of care to respond appropriately to situations where there are concerns relating to visible signs of illness, mental health difficulties, psychological, personality or emotional disorders, safeguarding concerns, and the detrimental impact on the functioning of the individual student and/or other members of the ACM community. 

When to use this policy

2.6 This policy should be used in circumstances where as a result of a known or suspected underlying physical or mental health impairment: 

  • A student has disclosed concerns regarding their own fitness to study, in relation to factors concerned with their health, wellbeing, or other circumstances that pose prohibitive to effective engagement with their studies and wider participation with ACM. 
  • A student’s ability to study is neither manageable nor achievable in relation to specific tasks and/or activities; 
  • A student poses a risk to their own health, safety and/or wellbeing and/or that of other persons;
  • The student’s behaviour is, or is at risk of, negatively affecting the teaching, learning and/or experience of other students; 
  • The student’s behaviour is, or is at risk of, negatively affecting the day-to-day activities of ACM. 

2.7 This policy should be used when a student’s fitness to study is a cause for concern and all other procedures, processes or options to support the student have been considered or exhausted. 

2.8 ACM may choose to initiate another process either alongside or in place of this policy where the process, procedure or policy relates to a student’s conduct and well-being. 

2.9 Staff who have any level of concern about a student’s health or behaviour should consider use of this policy. If there is a concern of this nature, it is appropriate to explore the student’s well being and behaviour, and agree supportive action rather than enter into a disciplinary procedure. If a member of staff is unsure about whether to implement this procedure, they can seek advice and discuss their concern with ACM’s Designated Safeguarding Lead or a member of the ACM Safeguarding Team. 

2.10 This policy may also be applied if there are concerns about a prospective student or applicant to ACM, which may result in a refusal of a place on application or during the induction period if it is identified that ACM cannot meet the needs of the student concerned. 

  1. POLICY OWNER 

3.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Student Engagement and Quality Committee. The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework. 

Implementation and compliance with the Policy, and associated procedures will be overseen by the following designated staff: 

  • Registrar 
  • Registry Manager
  • Designated Safeguarding Lead 
  • Group Lead on Student Experience 
  • Additional Needs and Disability Coordinator 
  • Wellbeing Coordinator 
  • Admissions Manager

     4. REFERENCE POINTS

4.1. Internal: 

  • Academic Integrity Policy 
  • Admissions Policy 
  • Additional Needs and Disabilities Policy 
  • Safeguarding Policy 
  • Student Complaints & Grievances Policy 
  • Student Disciplinary Policy 

4.2. External: 

  • Equality Act 2000 
  • QAA Quality Code 
  • Mental Capacity Act 2005 
  • OIA Good Practice Framework 
  • Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards

 

     5. DATE OF APPROVAL AND NEXT REVIEW

Version: 2.0

Approved on:    01 Sep 2025

Approved by:    Academic Board

Next Review:     August 2026 

Download: POL_011_Fitness to Study

Policy 012: Learning, Teaching, Assessment and Attainment Policy

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: anddegree@acm.ac.uk

Policy 012: LEARNING, TEACHING, ASSESSMENT AND ATTAINMENT

  1. PURPOSE

1.1 This Policy outlines ACM’s approach to learning, teaching, assessment at ACM.

1.2 It is the intention of this Policy to clearly outline the ways in which ACM promises to achieve its strategic aim of developing autonomous learners who are equipped to sustain a career in the creative industries.

1.3 This Policy has been written in accordance with ACM’s Learning, Teaching, Assessment and Attainment Strategy. 

  1. POLICY DETAILS

2.1 ACM is committed to delivering an architecture for learning that supports and celebrates differentiation and inclusion.

2.2 ACM has constructed the education programme to ensure that students experience being part of a discipline-specific community; an engaging and dynamic cohort; and a focused and purposeful project group applying the knowledge and skills developed in each of the modules.

2.3 ACM understands the different needs of students across each academic level, and the transitions between them. ACM will work to ensure that students obtain the knowledge and skills at each level, and support them in preparing for and achieving the learning journey of each level.

2.4 ACM believes that pastoral care and academic learning should work in parallel in order to achieve the best possible outcome for students. Senior academic staff will support the students on the learning journey of each level alongside the delivery of the modules for that level.

2.5 ACM will ensure there is flexibility in the learning, teaching and assessment strategies to support students with additional needs, disabilities, or other mitigating circumstances. Details on ACM’s approach to supporting students with Additional Needs and Disabilities can be found in ACM’s Additional Needs and Disabilities Policy which can be found here: acm.ac.uk/policies.

2.6 ACM encourages and challenges its staff to continuously improve the attainment rates of students in widening participation groups as defined in ACM’s Access and Participation Plan.

2.7 ACM recognises the value of transferable skills, which may be learned anywhere, and we encourage all students to engage in life-long and life-wide learning. This is reflected in the programme design and curriculum development.

2.8 ACM will skills-match all academic staff with the learning provision to ensure that students have consistent and high-quality learning that is appropriate to the level at which they are studying.

2.9 ACM will assure the high standards of delivery are maintained through carrying out session observations via formal learning walks. This not only supports the student journey but also the professional development of ACM’s academic staff.

2.10 Students progress through their learning journey is continuously reviewed throughout the modules, via feedback from peers and academic staff in both formal and informal structures. This works to empower the students to take ownership of their progression, recognise the skills, knowledge and understanding they have gained at any given point, and identify what they need to accomplish in order to develop and achieve their goals.

2.11 Students receive positive, constructive and applicable feedback so that ACM can assist them in making progress in their personal, professional and academic journey.

2.12 ACM double marks all research projects at FHEQ Level 6, and ensures standardisation across all marking at each level. Moderation procedures are carried out as part of each marking event to ensure parity across grading.

2.13 ACM complies with the academic regulations of its validating partners, Middlesex University and East Surrey College, and provides samples of work as required.

2.14 ACM has five core development pathways benchmarked at each level, building the capacity of the student up to graduate level. These are:

  1. Musical Literacy
  2. Digital Literacy
  3. Research
  4. Professional Conduct
  5. Enterprise

ACM has appointed Level Leaders to champion this development for all students.

2.15 ACM Learning Resources and Library have been developed to support the five core development pathways outlined in 2.14 and all of the validated programmes. ACM aims to provide dedicated study space on each of our campuses and access to a wholly digital collection of resources which encompass relevant academic and professional fields.

  1. POLICY SCOPE

3.1 This Policy applies to all students at ACM, studying across all levels and at all campuses.

3.2 This Policy also applies to the academic staff across all ACM campuses.

  1. RELATED POLICIES
  • Student Engagement and Participation
  • Additional Needs and Disability
  • Reasonable Adjustments
  • Extenuating Circumstances
  • Safeguarding
  1. POLICY OWNER

5.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Academic Board. The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework.

  1. DEFINITIONS

6.1 Discipline-specific community: These are sessions that relate to the specific subject area, or pathway, and involve the entire community in that area. These ensure consistency and standardisation of approach and direction of the module.

6.2 Engaging and dynamic cohort: These are sessions that enable specialist interests through discussion, debate, demonstrations, case studies, and peer-review. They usually consist of a smaller group of students (normally around 20-28 students).

6.3 Focused project groups: These are sessions of around 6-9 students working independently and collectively on projects that enable them to apply the knowledge and skills gained in the modules in a professionally-relevant context.

6.4 Life-long learning: Life-long learning is an attitude that recognises that learning never stops and is relevant for every job role and creative work project throughout your career.

6.5 Life-wide learning: Life-wide learning encapsulates the skills you learn in any aspect of your social, community, or professional life and you can apply them outside of the initial context in which you learned them.

  1. EXHIBITS/APPENDICES/FORMS

There are no relevant exhibits, appendices or forms related

  1. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW

Version:                         2.1

Approved on:               03 September 2024

Approved by:               Academic Board

Date of next review:    August 2025

Download: 012 POL_012_Learning Teaching Assessment and Attainment_202209

Policy 015: Admissions Policy

Policy 015: Admissions Policy

1. Purpose and Scope

1.1 This Policy outlines the open, transparent and accessible way in which ACM approaches student admission on to Higher Education Programmes (Degrees) and Further Education Courses (Diplomas).

2. Policy Statement

2.1 ACM ensures that student admissions are facilitated by professional admissions staff, in liaison with senior academic staff, to ensure the fair and consistent assessment of applicants for entry to programmes of study. Due regard is given to the potential of the applicant to be successful in their chosen programme of study.

2.2 Entry requirements and selection criteria will not exclude or favour applicants on grounds relating to:

  • Age
  • Disability
  • Gender
  • Sex
  • Marriage and civil partnership
  • Pregnancy and maternity
  • Race
  • Religion and belief
  • Sexual orientation

2.3 It is the responsibility of the applicant to be confident that they can cope with the practical and physical demands of the course, accepting such changes as would constitute reasonable adjustments in case of disability.

Further Education (FE) Courses

2.4 Diploma qualifications offered by the Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) are of the Diploma Level 2 and 3 standard, and validated by the University of the Arts London (UAL). Students who have followed the UK route to a Further Education qualification will therefore normally be at least 16 years of age on admission.

Higher Education (HE) Programmes

2.5 Degree Qualifications offered by the Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) meet UK Higher Education academic standards.

2.6 ACM recognises, however, that applicants will be at different stages of maturity and prior learning irrespective of age on application and will judge each application on its individual merits. It is expected that admission onto ACM’s Degree programmes will be subject to students admitted at a minimum age, upon enrolment of:

Level 0: 17 years

Level 4: 18 years

Applicants

2.7 ACM will consider each application in a fair, efficient and transparent manner.

2.8 ACM will treat all applicants and students equally. All applicants must meet the prescribed course entry requirements, and will be selected on the basis of demonstration of an acceptable level of ability within the course specific Selection Criteria. Over and above this, the needs of each applicant who declares  a learning need or disability will be investigated and negotiated with the individual on a case by case basis to ensure that any reasonable adjustments are made to ensure they  will not be disadvantaged.

2.9 Places on ACM courses are limited. Offers will be made to applicants with the highest academic and/or professional potential.

2.10 Applications and enrolments may be accepted after the commencement of the course however, it should be ensured that students are in attendance by teaching week 4 of the academic term.

Entry Requirements

2.11 Basic entry requirements for all ACM courses and programmes are set out in the ACM Prospectus. ACM welcomes applications for its Degree programmes from those who might not have formal qualifications. This could relate to those who did not achieve Level 3 qualifications (such as ‘A’ levels), as well as those who may have completed non-traditional forms of education that do not result in a formal academic award.  Consideration will be given to applicants who do not hold prescribed entry requirements but who can demonstrate their suitability and preparedness to undertake the programme of study for which they have applied. This may be assessed through Recognition/Accreditation of Prior Learning or consideration of a ‘Concessionary Entry Task’.

2.12 Further Education: for Accreditation of Prior Learning please refer to the ACM Accreditation of Prior Learning Policy & Procedure document.

2.13 Higher Education: For Recognition of Prior Learning please refer to the Middlesex University Recognition of Prior Learning Policy & Procedure document, and Falmouth University’s Accreditation of Prior Learning Policy document.

Selection of applicants

2.14 Over and above the Entry Requirements for the course, Programme Managers will exercise discretion in the selection process based on the UCAS Application proforma (for Degree Programmes), or Application pro forma documents (For Diploma courses) and/or Auditions and/or Interviews.

2.15 For each course, selection criteria enable Programme Managers to select the most suitable applicants who meet the entry requirements for the course. The selection criteria will be used by all trained tutors involved in the selection process for a programme of study to ensure consistency.

2.16 Admissions/Auditions and Interview documentation is completed to ensure effective and accurate communication of decisions from Programme Managers to Registry staff.

2.17 Applicants will be sent Audition guides specific to their study route. Details of the audition and selection guidance provides in depth details of the audition requirements.

Auditions/Videos and Interviews/Telephone Interviews

2.18 ACM courses and programmes can require applicants to be auditioned and/or interviewed.

2.19 The audition and interview process allows the applicant to visit the ACM campus, where the majority of scheduled learning activities will take place, to meet tutors and students and to discuss the suitability of the course in relation to their needs and career aspirations. It is intended as a two-way exchange of information and questions.

A structured interview framework, with questions determined to enable selection of appropriate applicants, ensures that all interviewees have a comparable experience and are assessed equitably.

2.20 The audition enables the candidate to demonstrate their potential to undertake and be successful in the course for which they have applied.

2.21  Both the audition and interview provide opportunities for ACM Staff to assess more closely the suitability of the applicant for the programme of study.

2.22 All applicants will be invited to attend an audition or interview and will be sent an audition confirmation email that will have a link to with audition guidelines for what to expect from the day along with additional information on what to prepare.

2.23 Interviews/Auditions may exceptionally be conducted via Skype if the applicant is unable to attend an audition or interview due to location or personal circumstances.

2.24 Interviews and auditions during Clearing will be held via Skype where the applicant will be asked to prepare and perform a song of their choice, or they will be asked to provide digital submissions of some sample pieces that they have worked on.

Consideration of Applications

2.25 All applications submitted by the date specified on the ACM live website, or in UCAS publicity, will be given equal consideration.

2.26 Programme Managers will not allocate all available places before the equal consideration deadline set by UCAS for receipt of applications (normally in January each year).

2.27 After the UCAS deadline for equal consideration, any applications for September of that year will be deemed late, and applications will be processed on a first come first served basis and invited to attend an audition or interview accordingly.

2.28 If all places on an FE Course or Degree Programme are allocated, any further successful applicants will be put on a waiting list and notified if a place becomes available. This is operated on a first come first serve basis.

2.29 The outcome of an audition will usually be communicated to applicants verbally at the end of their audition / interview, with successful applicants given an ACM “success” letter. The verbal offer, whether conditional or unconditional with the audition outcome informing the offer basis will then be followed up in writing within two working days. This will be sent via email in the form of a digital contract. UCAS track will also be updated by ACM Admissions Officers to reflect the offer status, if the student is applying via UCAS for an HE Programme.

2.30 Where the admissions process includes an audition, notification will normally be made within two weeks of the audition date. The notification will inform applicants of details regarding time, date and location of the audition, as well as providing guidance regarding requirements needed to be demonstrated within the audition.

Criminal Convictions

2.31 Applicants are required to disclose any unspent convictions. Failure to disclose any spent or unspent convictions may result in an offer of study to be rescinded.

2.32 Applications from candidates with criminal convictions will receive careful consideration by the Designated Safeguarding Lead, Admissions Manager and relevant Programme Manager, with advice from Senior Managers where deemed necessary.  Applicants must, upon request, provide full details of any/or all convictions they may have disclosed under point 2.31 above.

2.33 ACM reserves the right to reject any applicant with a criminal conviction or any applicant who may jeopardise the security, safety or reputation and integrity of ACM or its community, or where there are other relevant professional considerations.

2.34 Matters relating to disclosures of Criminal Convictions are managed by the DSL, under the Disclosure of Convictions Procedure.

Staff Development and Training

2.34 The Admissions Manager will ensure that all tutors and Admissions staff involved in the selection of applicants are trained in ACM’s specific audition and admission procedures and selection criteria, and familiar with ACM’s course offerings.

2.35 Provision is made within the budget for administrative staff to attend external training such as;

  • Equality and Diversity – opportunities and challenges in HE admissions
  • International admissions
  • HE networking events

2.36 Internal training for Admissions staff will be provided by the Admissions Manager on any new programmes, processes or policies to ensure that all staff are informed of any new changes or developments.

2.37 Written guidance is provided to tutors responsible for the auditions of applicants onto courses and programmes at ACM. The guidance is reviewed annually to ensure the content is current and valid and aligned with professional standards.

‘Clearing’

2.38 Clearing is a part of the UCAS university application process. It is a way for universities to fill any spaces they have left for the new academic year. It gives applicants who do not hold an offer another chance of finding a university place.

2.39 ACM will participate in and accept applicants through Clearing if there are places remaining for a programme of study. Concessions will not be sought for applicants at this stage nor will applicants be able to apply for AP(E)L/RPL

2.40 Applicants presenting at the Clearing stage will only be considered for Scholarships or ACM Bursaries if one should become available during the Clearing process. The same criteria used for those applying earlier in the application process will then be applied.

Deferred Entry

2.41 ACM will accept applications for deferred entry for all courses.

2.42 Deferred entry offers will be held for a maximum of one year. Scholarships and ACM Bursaries will only be allocated in respect of the current entry cycle.

Registration

2.43 All students are required to complete a registration form at the start of their course, and when progressing from one FHEQ Level to the next.

2.44 Registration information about students on FHEQ-level 4 programmes, and above,  is passed to the partner university within six weeks after the start of the trimester.

2.45  Registration information about students on UAL-validated courses, is passed to the funding and validating bodies.

Provision of Information

2.46 Entry requirements, application, audition and interview procedures will be communicated to applicants through the ACM Prospectus and by electronic communication on receipt of the application. (UCAS inform applicants of their own processes; however additional ACM processes will be communicated to applicants as appropriate).

2.47 Information on fees, additional expenses and funding opportunities is provided through our Registry, issued on request before an application is received and systematically at audition or when an application is received. Applicants are directed to appropriate information in respect of Government and other funding sources, including ACM Bursaries.

2.48 Successful applicants will be notified in writing of any significant changes that may be made to a programme of study after an offer of a place has been made.

2.49 Information relating to the ACM Admissions Appeals procedures will be made available to applicants on request. Prospective students and applicants may request a review of an admissions decision by accessing the procedures available to them under the Complaints and Grievances Policy.

Allocation of Scholarships and ACM Bursaries

2.50 Scholarships to be allocated by ACM will be done so in accordance with the current published criteria for awarding that is current.

2.51 As a part of the admissions process, an admissions placing list is established based on the applicant’s entry qualifications (or projected outcome of results) and their performance at audition and interview. This list is then used as the guide for allocating Scholarships and ACM Bursaries. The highest placed eligible applicants will receive available Scholarships.

2.52 Applicants for ACM Bursaries must apply by published deadlines to be considered for awards for the forthcoming academic year. ACM Bursaries will be allocated taking into account the applicant’s financial circumstances, and will be made only in respect of tuition fees. Applicants must agree to the terms and conditions of any Bursary offered.

2.53 The number and value of ACM Bursaries varies at the start of each Academic Year.

Recruitment

2.54 All promotional literature on ACM programmes of study will reflect the diverse social, cultural and ethnic backgrounds of the potential students for those courses and programmes, and outreach initiatives will reflect the ACM’s Equality and Diversity Policy.

2.55 The ACM Prospectus will give sufficient information to enable applicants to make informed decisions about their career options.

2.56 Target recruitment numbers for each course are agreed annually between the Head of Education, Programme Managers  and the Executive and take into account:

  • market demand;
  • target numbers from outside agencies i.e. Office for Students (OfS) and Education Funding Agency (EFA);
  • ACM resources available;
  • a requirement to recoup course delivery costs.

Data Protection

2.57 Successful applicants’ records will be kept and maintained for the duration of their course of study and for one further year after programme/course completion or withdrawal. After this date only a transcription of achievements ratified by a Final Exam Board ( or UALab Student Report Form process will be maintained electronically and/or manually.

The records of applicants who are unsuccessful will be kept for one month to allow applicant requests for review against the decision in line with the student complaint procedures set out by the ACM Student Complaint and Grievance Policy, if they wish to exercise this policy. If no complaint  is lodged and received by ACM within this timeframe the records will be destroyed.

2.58 The application form includes a declaration for applicants to sign which provides information on the ACM’s compliance with the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) , Data Protection Employment Practices Code, the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, the Human Rights Act 1998, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the United Kingdom Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Personal Data) Order 2006 and the Protection of Freedom Act 2012.

Moderation of Applications

2.59 The moderation of rejected applicants is submitted via a report to the relevant Programme Manager. The Programme Manager review’s available recorded evidence and / or the student’s audition submission. The Programme Manager has a final decision regarding whether to either uphold or overturn the decision.

2.60 A sample of successful applicants is submitted in a report to the relevant Programme Manager at the end of each audition event. Programme Managers use this to identify where training is required.

2.61 Monitoring and review of the audition and selection process help to promote greater consistency between practice, subjects, departments and faculties as well as between programmes.

Complaints relating to admissions decisions

2.62 Prospective students and applicants may utilise ACM’s Complaint and Grievances Policy and Procedure during the admission and auditions process, up to and including point of an offer being made. Students may utilise ACM’s Complaints procedure to request a review of the admissions decision and the process followed and completed in issuing an offer of study.

2.63 Prospective students will be signposted to ACM’s Complaint and Grievances policy during the auditions process and in writing at point of offer.

2.64 Through utilising the Complaints and Grievances Procedure, applicants may request a review of ACM’s admission and offer decision, but may not appeal a decision. This is because ACM’s Appeal Policy is used alongside a request to review an academic decision.

3. Responsible Parties

3.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of the policy in liaison with the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager. The Admissions Policy lead is:

  • Admissions Manager

3.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the following designated staff:

  • Admissions Manager
  • Admissions Officers
  • Education Strategist
  • Programme Managers
  • Group Head of Education
  • Head of Quality and Student Experience
  • ACM Data Protection Officer

4. Reference Points

  • 1. Internal:
  • Admissions Guidance
  • Student Grievance Policy
  • Data Access and Protection Policy
  • Equality and Diversity Policy
  • Safeguarding Policy
  • Disclosure of Convictions Procedures
  • Special Educational Needs Policy
  • Fitness to Study Policy

 

  • 2. External:
  • Middlesex University Regulations, B: General Regulations for Admissions
  • UALab Admissions Policy
  • OfS Conditions B1 – B6
  • QAA Quality Code Chapter B2: Recruitment, Selection and Admission to Higher Education
  • Data Protection Act 1998
  • General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
  • Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
  • Crime and Disorder Act 1998
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
  • Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003
  • The Freedom of Information Act 2000
  • The United Kingdom Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Personal Data) Order 2006
  • Protection of Freedom Act 2012

5. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                        1.3

Approved on:               03 September 2024

Approved by:               Academic Board

Next Review:                August 2025

Download POL_015_Admissions_202209

Policy 018: Acceptable Use of IT and E-safety

Policy 018: Acceptable Use of IT and E-safety

1. Purpose and Scope

1.1 This policy describes how the Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) looks upon the issue of the Acceptable Use of IT and E-Safety. It covers the issue of the safety of students, staff and potentially other individuals using the internet and electronic communication devices such as email, mobile phones, games consoles and social networking sites, whether using ACM systems or devices of their own.

1.2 This policy applies to all computer users (‘Users’) within ACM (including persons who are not staff or students but who have been authorised to use ACM’s IT facilities) whether they use IT equipment based at ACM’s premises or access the systems provided by ACM via the internet using ACM-owned or private computing equipment. Compliance with this policy does not imply authorisation to use ACM’s facilities.

1.3 This policy is designed to ensure that all are treated in a fair and equitable manner.

1.4 This policy covers:

  • The use of all ACM IT facilities and systems, which include the local area network (LAN); any other directly or indirectly connected network; and the internet.
    • (b)        The production of any material using ACM IT facilities, including printed output, internet pages, email messages and social media.
    • (c )        The publication of any material relating to ACM systems within and outside of ACM.

1.5       The content of this policy aligns with government legislation, the regulations of ACM’s validating partners and other external stakeholders to whom ACM must make reference.

2. Policy Statement

Acceptable Use of IT and E-safety

2.1       ACM recognises the key role that IT plays in supporting both the educational and business administration needs of the company. ACM is committed to ensuring that both staff and students have access to the necessary facilities and support, and remain safe while using them.

2.2       ACM’s IT facilities are provided to assist with day to day work or studies. Use for any other purpose is only by concession and should be strictly limited with utmost care taken to ensure that nothing is done that will interfere with operations.

2.3       When using ACM’s IT facilities users must conduct themselves, at all times, in a lawful and appropriate manner so as not to discredit or harm ACM or other users and at all times in accordance with the contents of this policy. Accordingly, this policy is not a definitive statement of the purposes for which ACM’s IT facilities should or should not be used and ACM reserves the right to apply this policy in a purposive manner.

2.4       ACM reserves the right to place whatever limitations it deems appropriate on usage in order to safeguard the function of its IT facilities and users’ compliance with any applicable laws and/or the contents of this policy.

2.5       The breadth of issues classified by Ofsted as falling within e-safety is considerable, but can be categorised into three areas of risk:

  • (a)        content: being exposed to illegal, inappropriate or harmful material
  • (b)        contact: being subjected to harmful online interaction with other users
  • (c)         conduct: personal online behaviour that increases the likelihood of, or causes harm

2.6       ACM considers students’ e-safety to be the responsibility of all members of ACM staff as well as that of ACM students.

2.7       Staff members must do all that they reasonably can to ensure that social media environments are safe for staff and students, and act accordingly if privacy issues, abuse or bullying take place. For further information about how ACM staff and students are expected to behave on social media, please refer to the ACM Social Media Policy and Procedures.

2.8       ACM ensures that the network is safe and secure. ACM ensures that security software up to date and fit for purpose. Appropriate security measures will include the use of enhanced filtering and protection of firewalls, servers, routers and workstations to prevent malicious or accidental access of ACM systems and information.  On occasion, and where deemed necessary to do so, digital communications, including emails and internet postings, over the ACM network, will be monitored in accordance with this policy.

2.9       Monitoring of internet is undertaken to ensure that there are no breaches, or threats to ACM networks.

2.10     Failure or refusal to comply with this policy is considered to be a serious disciplinary offence which may lead to disciplinary action including, without limitation, withdrawal of services, expulsion/dismissal (with or without notice) and/or referral to the relevant authorities.

2.11 ACM will report any illegal or suspicious activity to the relevant external agencies and work in collaboration with these agencies to ensure that any risks are managed effectively through implementation of proportionate measures. This extends to the accessing, and distribution, or promulgation of any illegal or offensive materials and/or communications that may seek to victimise, cause offensive, radicalise or vilify any individual or organisation. This extends to sharing of, distribution, and communication of any extremist materials and communications in accordance with the Prevent Duty and association provisions.

  1. Responsible Parties

3.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of the policy in liaison with the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager. The Acceptable Use of IT and E-Safety Policy lead is:

  • Head of Information Technology

3.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the following designated staff:

  • Head of Information Technology
  • Human Resources Manager
  • Head of Education
  • Pathway Leaders

4. Reference Points

4.1 Internal:

  • Academic Appeals
  • Academic Integrity
  • Bullying & Harassment Policy
  • Equality & Diversity Policy
  • Safeguarding Policy
  • Staff Social Media Policy
  • Data Protection Policy
  • Student Disciplinary Policy
  • Student Complaints & Grievances Policy

4.2 External:

  • Data Protection Act 1988 and 2003
  • Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003
  • Freedom of Information Act 2000
  • Ofsted Inspecting E-Safety Guide
  • Preventing and Tackling Bullying (Department of Education)
  • Childnet International Staff E-Safety Guidance
  • The Prevent Duty
  • Ofsted Inspecting e-safety guide (published April 2014 and withdrawn July 2014)

5. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                       1.2

Approved on:              01 September 2025

Approved by:              Academic Board

Next Review:               August  2026

Download POL_018_Acceptable use of IT and E-Safety_202209

Policy 026: PREVENT Duty

Policy 026: PREVENT Duty

Policy Opening Statement 

When operating this policy, ACM uses the following accepted UK Government definition of extremism, which is: 

‘Vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs; and/or calls for the death of members of our armed forces, whether in this country or overseas’. 

The KCSIE 2022 document offers the updated definitions of the following: 

Extremism is the vocal or active opposition to our fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs. This also includes calling for the death of members of the armed forces. 

Radicalisation refers to the process by which a person comes to support terrorism and extremist ideologies associated with terrorist groups. 

Terrorism is an action that endangers or causes serious violence to a person/people; causes serious damage to property; or seriously interferes or disrupts an electronic system. The use or threat must be designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public and is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause. 

The Prevent duty should be seen as part of schools’ and colleges’ wider safeguarding obligations. Designated safeguarding leads and other senior leaders should familiarise themselves with the revised Prevent duty guidance: for England and Wales, especially paragraphs 57-76, which are specifically concerned with schools (and also covers childcare). The guidance is set out in terms of four general themes: risk assessment, working in partnership, staff training, and IT policies. There is additional guidance: Prevent duty guidance: for further education institutions in England and Wales that applies to colleges. 

All extremists aim to develop destructive relationships between different communities by promoting division, fear and mistrust of others based on ignorance or prejudice and thereby limiting the life chances of young people. Education is a powerful weapon against this; equipping young people with the knowledge, skills and critical thinking, to challenge and debate in an informed way. 

ACM does not tolerate extremist views of any kind whether from internal sources; learners, staff or governors, or external sources; college community, external agencies or individuals. Students see ACM as a safe place, free from harm or risk of harm and where necessary we will action referrals or processes to ensure ACM remains a safe place for all. 

At ACM we recognise that extremism and exposure to extremist materials and influences can lead to poor outcomes for students and so should be addressed as a safeguarding concern as set out in this policy. We also recognise that if we fail to challenge extremist views, we are failing to protect our students. 

Therefore, at ACM we will provide a broad and balanced pastoral education programme, delivered by skilled professionals, so that our students understand and become tolerant of difference and diversity. We will ensure that they feel valued and not marginalised. By delivering a broad and balanced pastoral education programme, augmented by the use of external sources where appropriate, we will strive to ensure our students recognise risk and build resilience to manage any such risk themselves where appropriate to their age and ability but also to help them develop the critical thinking skills needed to engage in informed debate. 

Any prejudice, discrimination or extremist views, including derogatory language, displayed by students or staff will always be challenged and where appropriate dealt with in accordance with our student behaviour management policy or through our fitness to study policy. 

As part of wider safeguarding responsibilities, ACM staff will be alert to: 

  • The importance of promoting British Values through both the curriculum and as part of the pastoral development education programme.. 
  • Disclosures by students, of their exposure to the extremist actions, views or materials of others outside, such as in their homes or community groups, especially where students have not actively sought these out. 
  • Graffiti symbols, writing or art work promoting extremist messages or images 
  • Students accessing extremist material online, including through social networking sites 
  • Parental reports of changes in behaviour, friendship or actions and requests for assistance Partner colleges, local authority services, and police reports of issues affecting students in other colleges or settings 
  • Students voicing opinions drawn from extremist ideologies and narratives
  • Use of extremist or ‘hate’ terms to exclude others or incite violence 
  • Intolerance of difference, whether secular or religious or, in line with our Equalities Policy, views based on, but not exclusive to, gender, disability, homophobia, race, colour or culture 
  • Attempts to impose extremist views or practices on others 
  • Anti-Western or Anti-British views 
  • Emerging groups such as INCELS or MUUR 

ACM will closely follow any locally agreed procedure as set out by the Local Authority and/or Safeguarding Children’s Board’s agreed processes and criteria for safeguarding individuals vulnerable to extremism and radicalisation. We will actively engage with the police, and regional DfE area Prevent Co-coordinators. 

At ACM we reserve the right to initiate our own internal policies in light of a safeguarding concern that may put the student, other students, or staff at risk of harm. 

We will help support students who may be vulnerable to such influences as part of our wider safeguarding responsibilities and where we believe a student is being directly affected by extremist materials or influences. We will ensure that we follow procedure as directed by local authority, Prevent coordinator, police, social care and any other agency necessary to safeguard and support that student and others. Additionally, in such instances our internal policies may be actioned to prevent risk of harm. 

By delivering a broad and balanced pastoral education programme, augmented by the use of external sources where appropriate, we will strive to ensure our students recognise risk and build resilience to manage any such risk themselves where appropriate to their age and ability but also to help them develop the critical thinking skills needed to engage in informed debate. 

  1. Purpose and Scope

1.1 This policy outlines ACM’s approach towards to meeting expectations with regard to the PREVENT Duty.

1.2 The Counter Terrorism and Security Act 2015 places a duty on all RHEBs (Relevant Higher Education Bodies) to have due regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism. This legislation is given specific statutory force through the Prevent duty guidance for higher education institutions in England and Wales, referred to as the ‘Prevent Duty’.

1.3 The Prevent duty guidance for England and Wales (2023), issued on September 7, 2023, under Section 29 of the Counter Terrorism and Security Act 2015, serves as statutory guidance for specified authorities in England and Wales. Subject to Parliamentary approval, this guidance is set to become effective on December 31, 2023.

1.4 Its primary purpose is to offer a framework for preventing individuals from engaging in terrorism or supporting such activities, while also addressing the rehabilitation and disengagement of those already involved in terrorism.

Until the new guidance comes into effect, specified authorities in England and Wales must continue to adhere to the Prevent duty guidance for England and Wales (2015). This 2015 guidance provides the existing framework for these authorities to fulfill their Prevent duty obligations.

1.5 This Policy applies to all staff, students, and third parties of ACM and to all Academy-controlled activities undertaken in the UK.

  1. Policy Statement

Legal Context and ACM Approach

2.1 The underlying considerations adopted by ACM in implementing the Prevent Duty are: 

  • a commitment to the safety and wellbeing of our staff and students and all who interact with ACM, including not being victims of, or complicit with any activities linked to radicalisation; 
  • preserving equality and diversity as foundations of ACM life, whilst ensuring these values are not threatened; 
  • supporting campus cohesion and harmonious relations across all parts of ACM community; 
  • that the requirements described in this Policy are implemented in a proportionate and risk-based manner, relevant to the local context in which ACM campus is based. 

2.2 The legal definition of terrorism as defined in the Terrorism Act 2000 applies to the Prevent duty. ACM acknowledges and upholds the position that the definition of terrorism in the Terrorism Act is broad, in describing it as “the use or threat of action which involves serious damage to property; or endangers a person’s life; or creates a serious risk to the health and safety of the public or a section of the public; or is designed seriously to interfere with or disrupt an electronic system. The use or threat must be designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public and is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.” 

2.3 Terrorism may take the form of extremist behaviour and acts. The statutory Prevent Duty Guidance defines extremism as “vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs and calls for the death of members of our armed forces, whether in this country or overseas”. 

2.4 In accordance with this definition, ACM considers that extremist ideologies, and those who express them, undermine the principles of freedom of speech and academic freedom. 

2.5 Office for Students is the principal regulator of ACM and has established a monitoring framework to assess compliance of all Higher Education Providers with the Prevent Duty. ACM has a legal duty to provide reports and evidence of its compliance with the Prevent Duty to OfS, including serious issues which arise related to ACM’s Prevent responsibilities. OfS’s role does not extend to investigating terrorism-related incidents on campus. 

Arrangements to demonstrate due regard to the Prevent Duty

Working in Partnership

2.6 ACM will work in close partnership with relevant partners including the FE/HE Regional Prevent Coordinator, local police, local authorities including Multi Agency Safeguarding Hubs, academic partners and establishment of formal links for sharing good practice in approaches, and information where this is a necessity. 

Leadership and Governance

2.7 The Executive has a statutory responsibility to ensure ACM satisfies the requirements of the Prevent Duty, with leadership and implementation delegated to the Senior Management Team for Prevent-related matters. 

2.8 The Senior Management Team has appointed ‘Leads’ to oversee implementation and review of Safeguarding and for Prevent Duty. 

Risk Assessment and Action Plan


2.9 ACM has developed a Prevent Risk Assessment of how and where students and staff might be drawn into terrorism, including violent and non-violent extremism, and an embedded action plan to mitigate risks. The Risk Assessment addresses the adequacy of institutional policies and arrangements regarding the campus and student welfare, including equality and diversity and the safety and welfare of students and staff. The Prevent Risk Assessment and embedded action Plan is coordinated by the Prevent Lead. 

External Speakers and Events

2.10 ACM has implemented a Policy for External Speakers and Events to reflect the Prevent Duty responsibilities. The Policy sets out the arrangements for managing events on campus and institution-branded events taking place off campus. The Policy is set within the context of the statutory responsibility of ACM to secure freedom of speech. A risk-based approach to the assessment of events will be taken and this may require modification or adjustments to the content of, or arrangements for, events to mitigate risks in respect of the Prevent duty. Whilst in exceptional circumstances only, the right is reserved by ACM to prohibit events where speakers promote or seek to incite hatred of, or violence against others. 

Welfare and Pastoral Care

2.11 ACM has a range of services for welfare and pastoral care through the Student Services (for students) and Human Resources department (for staff) . Whilst ACM does not have a specific campus chaplaincy service, guidance regarding local services is made available. 

Staff Training

2.12 ACM has accessible training materials available to academic and professional services staff outlining the requirements of the Prevent Duty. Training is delivered to all staff to aid awareness of the Prevent duty and its requirements, and the arrangements that ACM has in place to seek to prevent staff or students from being drawn into terrorism or victims of it. 

2.13 ACM is committed to the ongoing training and development of staff through the provision of approved CPD activity, ‘train the training’ events and seminars. 

IT Networks

2.14 ACM has in place various web-filtering mechanisms to ensure that its IT networks or equipment cannot be used by staff or students to access, support, promote or facilitate harmful content, including extremism-related material, unless this is for bona fide teaching and research purposes as approved by ACM. 

2.15 ACM is committed to engaging with its students in relation to the new Prevent duty requirements and will work with the Students council in this regard. This engagement includes collaboration and consultation on Prevent duty policy requirements as developed and delivered by ACM, representation of Student Union Officers and the Senior Management Team, and ongoing dialogue to ensure that the arrangements between both parties are joined up and effective. 

Referral and Reporting

2.16 ACM’s implementation of the Prevent duty is not to challenge or re-shape the current relationship between staff and students, or between any other stakeholders who make up the community. Instead the focus is that, in the rare event that a member of our community – be it a staff member, student, or anyone else connected with ACM – has a serious concern that someone else in our community is potentially being drawn into violent extremism or terrorism, they know where to seek advice and what to do with that concern. 

2.17 When a concern is raised about an individual in line with the process following this paragraph, we will respond sensitively and appropriately, mindful of the fact that some of the factors which may appear as signs of a person’s potential radicalisation might, in fact, be signs of a wide range of other support needs on the part of that individual. ACM therefore recognises the difficulties in defining attitudes and behaviours which may suggest someone has been, or is being, drawn into terrorism but would encourage concerns to be reported as outlined below. 

2.18 Where an individual is thought to be at imminent risk of harm to themselves or others, the emergency services should be called first (999) and then ACM Safeguarding Lead (01483 910197) to ensure follow-up action is coordinated. 

2.19 For Prevent-related concerns in relation to students where there is not perceived to be an immediate threat to the individual concerned or others, the Prevent Lead should be contacted directly. 

2.20 The Prevent Lead will gather information in relation to the referral and undertake an assessment to determine if there may be cause for concern in relation to the Prevent Duty. The Prevent Lead may seek guidance and advice from the Regional Prevent Coordinator when undertaking this initial assessment. For any matters of immediate concern may be referred directly to the local police to each campus (999). 

2.21 The Regional Prevent Coordinator for London and the South East region is:

Name: Alamgir Sheriyar

Phone: 0207 974 5828

Email: alamgir.sheriyar@camden.gov.uk

2.22 The Regional Prevent Coordinator for the West Midlands region is:

Name: Hifsa Haroon-Iqbal

Phone: 07872 941129

Email: hifsa.iqbal@birmingham.gov.uk

2.23 The Regional Prevent Coordinator for the London region is:

Name: Jennie Fisher 

Phone: 07880 469588 

Email: jennie.fisher@education.gov.uk 

 

Source: http://www.safecampuscommunities.ac.uk/guidance/regional-coordinators

2.24 Where there is a cause for concern the Prevent Lead will make prompt contact with the regional Multi-agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH), and work to ensure adequate safeguards are implemented as part of a coordinated approach as determined by the agency.

Surrey Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH)

2.25 The MASH is based at Guildford Police Station and combines Children’s Service social workers, Adult’s Service social workers, and health and police staff.

Opening Hours: Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm

(outside of these hours the Surrey Police should be contacted through 999)

Phone: 0300 470 9100

Email: mash@surreycc.gov.uk

Birmingham City Council Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH)

2.26 The MASH includes partners from our  Children’s Services, West Midlands Police, and Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust

Opening hours: Monday to Thursday: 8:45am to 5:15pm

Friday: 8:45am to 4:15pm

Phone: 0121 303 1888

Emergency out-of-hours:

Telephone: 0121 675 4806

Email: MASH@birmingham.gcsx.gov.uk

Lambeth Council Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) 

2.27 The MASH includes partners from our Children’s Services, Met Police, and Lambeth NHS Trust 

Opening hours: Monday to Friday 9-5 

Phone: 0207 926 5555 

Web:  lambeth.gov.uk 

2.28 For concerns about staff where there does not appear to be an immediate threat to the individual concerned or others, the HR Manager should be contacted with details of the concern. The HR Manager will liaise with the Prevent Lead, and refer to external authorities as required.

2.29 It is recognised that allegations against, or concerns about staff and students may be referred through other routes. In turn, these may be raised anonymously, in which case these will be raised as per the relevant routes above. 

2.30 ACM will ensure that the ACM student council is provided training and support in relation to the Prevent Duty and the referral of concerns to the ACM Prevent Lead.

2.31 Allegations or concerns which are raised by anonymous individuals will be investigated where there are sufficient grounds or scope to be able to do so based on the information provided. 

2.32 If an allegation is made frivolously, in bad faith, maliciously, or for personal gain or revenge by a student or staff member, disciplinary action may be taken against the person making the allegation. However, no action or detriment related to employment or study respectively will be taken against any member of staff who raises a genuine concern that proves to be unfounded. 

2.33 ACM will follow disciplinary procedures against any member of staff or student who is found to have committed criminal acts or any other misconduct related to terrorism, in the course of their studies or work activities, which may result in expulsion or dismissal. 

2.34 ACM has a legal duty to share information – in confidence – within ACM, and with external authorities, on matters related to individuals assessed as vulnerable to being drawn into terrorism, or at risk of being complicit in terrorist activity. Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed if, as a result of an investigation, individuals are requested to participate in subsequent investigations by the statutory authorities. 

2.35 A confidential record of all internal and external referrals made under this policy will be kept. In reaching any decision about external referral, ACM will have regard to its obligations under its Data Protection Policy and the General Data Protection Regulation 2018. Concerns will only be shared externally where there is a clear and compelling requirement to do so. 

Related safeguarding considerations

2.36 Concerns about individuals being drawn into terrorism may raise related welfare and safeguarding considerations, due to the likelihood of increased personal vulnerability (e.g. due to the recruitment tactics employed by radicalisers) and the possibility of associated abuse. Additional referral options exist for such cases, which would be explored and agreed with external safeguarding and statutory agencies as required. 

  1. Responsible Parties

3.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of the policy in liaison with the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager. Updates in the legislation will be incorporated into this policy in a timely manner. The Prevent Duty Policy lead is:

  • Safeguarding & Pastoral Services Manager

3.3 Implementation and compliance with the Policy is overseen by the following designated staff:

  • Safeguarding & Pastoral Services Manager 
  • Human Resource Department 
  • Executive Management
  1. Reference Points

4.1 Internal:

  • Safeguarding Policy 
  • Safeguarding Procedure 
  • Critical Incident Policy 
  • Equality and Diversity Policy 
  • Health and Safety 
  • Staff Disciplinary Policy 
  • Acceptable Use of IT and E-Safety

4.2 External:

  • The Prevent Duty 
  • Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups 2006 
  • Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 
  • Working Together to Safeguard Children 2018 
  • Keeping Children Safe in Education 2022
  • Safe Campus Communities (http://www.safecampuscommunities.ac.uk/ )
  1. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                     1.3

Approved on:            01 September 2025

Approved by:            Safeguarding and Pastoral Services Manager

Next Review:            August 2026 

Download POL_026_Prevent Duty

Policy 027: Published Information

Policy 027: Published Information

1. Purpose and Scope

1.1 This Policy aims to explain in an open, transparent and accessible way how ACM approaches the design, development and approval of content for its external and internal publication channels.

1.2 This Policy supports ACM staff in communicating to the public the purposes and value of the education we provide, to help prospective students make informed decisions about where, what, when and how they will study, and to enable current students to make the most of their higher education learning opportunities.

1.3 This policy states the ways in which ACM uses published content appropriately to safeguard academic standards, promote current learning opportunities available at ACM, and to assure and enhance academic quality.

1.4 ACM will ensure that its published content clearly and accurately describes the institution’s mission, values and overall strategy.

2. Policy Statement

Published Information

2.1 It is important to maintain public confidence in the value of the learning opportunities that ACM provides. One of the ways in which such confidence can be promoted is by producing appropriate information, focused on ACM’s intended audiences, about the learning opportunities that ACM offers. In addition to students and prospective students, some of this information is of direct interest to the public and should be accessible by anyone. The information should be timely, current, transparent, and focused on the needs of the intended audiences.

2.2 ACM has a duty to ensure that the information it publishes to its students, prospective students and other stakeholders is clear, accurate and complete.

2.3 To achieve this, ACM has adopted the following approval, control and review policy. This policy covers all material that is published on ACM websites or available publicly in hard copy format.

2.4 In relation to official ACM social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, ACM follows the principles set out below for official material and postings. In relation to postings by those who are not acting on behalf ACM, ACM staff have procedures in place to review such postings and to remove or address any inaccurate or offensive material.

Quality of Published Information

2.5 This policy is primarily focused on ensuring the quality of information that ACM publishes to:

  • Communicate the purposes and value of ACM courses to the public;
  • Assist prospective students in making informed decisions about where, what, when and how they will study;
  • Enable current students to make the most of their learning opportunities

Major Changes

2.6 This policy applies when making any material change to ACM’s published information, including its online presence, which:

(a) details ACM’s mission, values and overall strategy;

(b) describes the process for application and admission to our programmes of study;

(c) helps prospective students select their programme with an understanding of ACM’s academic environment and the provision that will be made to enable their development and achievement;

(d) informs current students about their course or programme of study at any point in their studies;

(e) sets out what ACM expects its current students and what students can expect of ACM;

(f)  sets out ACM’s arrangements for managing academic standards, quality assurance and enhancement, and describes the information used to support its implementation.

Minor Changes

2.7 This policy does not extend to all minor amendments to existing content, including social media sites actively controlled and managed by ACM, and information about enrichment activities, which can be carried out by designated members of ACM staff.

2.8 Staff updating social media sites on behalf of ACM should refer to the Social Media Policy.

Corporate Brand Identity

2.9. ACM is a professional, connected, high quality institution and we seek to reflect this in our visual corporate identity. This extends to our online brand. ACM requires a consistency of design across all of its methods of publication, including web pages, applications and social media sites, since the impression stakeholders gain of ACM is influenced by their use of any and all of these media. All methods of publication should conform to ACM design so that our brand is reinforced.

2.10. Standards for written material, including its style the type of information published, is of equal significance as the look and feel of the ACM brand. For this reason, all major content to be published should be subject to the same careful management. Members of ACM staff who wish to publish information, including to ACM web pages, are therefore required to follow the associated Content Approval Procedure.

2.11 Some content will change infrequently, but most has an effective lifespan so it should be reviewed on a regular basis and amended or deleted as appropriate. Any out-of-date or inaccurate content will lead users to question the validity of other published ACM content, so regular review is an essential part of ACM’s content management. Each update should also therefore follow the supporting procedure.

3. Responsible Parties

3.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of the policy in liaison with the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager. The Content Approval Policy lead is:

  • Marketing Manager

3.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the following designated staff:

  • Education Strategist
  • Marketing Manager
  • Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager
  • Head of Education
  • Academic Registrar

4. Reference Points

4.1 Internal:

  • Equality and Diversity Policy
  • Quality Assurance and Enhancement Policy
  • Data Protection Policy
  • Acceptable Use of IT Policy

4.2 External:

  • OfS Conditions B1 – B6
  • QAA Quality Code Chapter C: Published Information
  • Competition Act 1998
  • UK Higher Education – consumer law advice for providers
  • QAA Good practice guide to providing information to prospective students

5. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                         2.1

Approved on:               03 Sep 2024

Approved by:               Academic Board

Next Review:                August  2025

Download POL_027_Published lnformation_170728