Policy 017: Finance Policy

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: anddegree@acm.ac.uk

Policy 017: FINANCE 

  1. PURPOSE 

1.1 This policy outlines the arrangements for collection of student fees and charges. It covers sanctions which may be used in relation to students with overdue debts and is designed to ensure that all students are treated fairly, equitably and reasonably. Where arrangements apply specifically to international students, this will be made explicit in the paragraph wording. 

1.2 It is the intention of this Policy to clearly outline fee liability for all students at ACM Guildford, ACM Birmingham and ACM London. 

1.3 Students studying on short courses at ACM are required to pay the fees in full seven days prior to the commencement of their studies. No refund will be applicable should a student withdraw. 

1.4 ACM follows the guidance of Student Finance England, which administers student loans on behalf of the Government. Information on this can be found on the Student Finance England website: http://www.practitioners.slc.co.uk/policy/  

  1. POLICY DETAILS 

Tuition fee charges 

2.1 The amount that you will pay in respect of tuition fees is dependent on the course and year of study that you attend during the academic year. 

2.2 Fees at ACM are set on an annual basis each autumn for the following academic year, based on Government policy. 

2.3 Tuition fees may increase for every new academic year for the duration of your course dependent on government policy and to take into account inflation linked to the retail price index and costs associated with delivery. Therefore, students may be charged different fees for subsequent years of their chosen programme of study. Any changes will be notified to students in a timely manner. 

2.4 Tuition fees for each year of study, payment methods and due dates are outlined in the Fee Schedules for each programme. 

2.5 Annual Tuition fees at ACM cover registration, first attempt tuition, and entrance to first attempt examinations. Note: the fees do not include those for graduation, which are payable to the awarding university, or any resit assessments or retake modules. Any study visits or additional activities are not covered by tuition fees. Any additional fees for any second attempt teaching or retakes, will be confirmed at the point of relevance but will be set based on the relevant course fee and period of attendance required. 

2.5 Annual Tuition fees at ACM cover registration, first attempt tuition and entrance to first attempt examinations. Note: the fees do not include those for graduation, which are payable to the awarding university, or any resit assessments or retake modules. Any study visits or additional activities are not covered by tuition fees. Any additional fees for any second attempt teaching or retakes, will be confirmed at the point of relevance but will be set based on the relevant course fee and period of attendance required. 

2.6 Once enrolled, students are responsible for the payment of tuition fees and any other associated charges, including any amounts due from third parties which are not paid. Failure to settle fees on time will mean that ACM will withdraw access to relevant learning facilities and this may ultimately lead to deregistration from the University in the case of unpaid tuition fees. 

2.7 ACM reserves the right to reassess any student’s tuition fee liability should new information come to light that may affect the original assessment. 

2.8 Should a student change Programme, Pathway, Modules or Level during the course of the year, a tuition fee review and relevant change of tuition fee charges may be incurred. 

Tuition Fee payment types. 

2.9 There are three tuition fee payment types: 

(a) Fully funded by student loan – a student loan is available to cover the full tuition   fee; 

(b) Part-funded by student loan, and part self-financing – student loan only covers 

      part of the tuition fee and student is self funding the remaining element. 

(c) Fully self-financing – student is not eligible for student loan, or opts to self-fund the full tuition fee. 

2.10 Students waiting for confirmation of funding from Student Finance England or equivalent will be classified as fully self-financing until confirmation of support is received. Students will be required to provide evidence that the loan application is in progress if funding is not in place at the start of the academic year. 

2.11 Students aged 18 and under on the start date of their programme, studying on an FE course should be entitled to full government funding of tuition if the eligibility criteria is met. Students that have not secured government funding or that are aged 19 and over on the start date of their programme, will become personally responsible for the payment of tuition, unless a specific government funding plan exists. 

Tuition Fee Liability 

2.12 Students (or their parents or legal guardians for those students under the age of 18) become liable for the payment of the Annual Tuition Fee 14 days after the course start date, or 14 days after enrolling onto the programme where enrolment takes place after the course start date, having signed the terms and conditions. 

2.13 ACM offers home students the facility to pay their full fee in instalments. Students must be aware of instalment payment dates, which are detailed on the Fee Schedule sent to each student following acceptance onto a programme of study. 

2.14 Even where fees are payable by a third party, students remain personally liable to ACM for fees notified to them. 

2.15 The overall fee liability is based on the annual course fee liability, not any instalment plan that may have been agreed. 

2.16 Where a home student opts to pay their fees in full by the single upfront fee payment deadline, students will be offered a 10% discount on the Annual Tuition Fee. The discount will be removed if third party funding is later secured and the refund of the initial payment is requested. The discount described in this paragraph only applies to home students. 

2.17 UK undergraduate and postgraduate students and students with Settled Status under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) are responsible for ensuring that their application for financing from Student Finance England (SFE) or equivalent is made before the start of the academic year. Students must also ensure that any requests for further documentation and or information are complied with as soon as possible. 

2.18 If an employer or a third party organisation is paying the tuition fees, the student will need to provide evidence of this in writing in line with the payment deadlines above. A purchase order (as provided by your Sponsor) containing your details including your student ID and the value of your sponsors’ contribution should be emailed to studentfinance@acm.ac.uk 

2.19 ACM reserves the right to reject sponsorship purchase orders or letters if they are not original documents, do not contain the correct information, or if they are found not to be issued by a recognisable third party organisation. All invoices issued by ACM must be settled in full within 30 days. If invoices are not paid in accordance with these terms the debt will revert to the student. 

2.20 Fees paid by a relative or friend of the student is not considered to be a formal sponsorship. In this instance, the student will be considered to be self-financing. 

Fee Liability, Change of Circumstances and Withdrawal from Programme

2.21 Tuition fee charges are determined on the basis of enrolment status and not actual attendance. This means that if a student stops attending, but does not formally withdraw or interrupt, the student will be liable for tuition fees up until the point in time that they officially notify ACM or are de-registered by ACM. 

2.22 In order to officially withdraw or interrupt from a programme of study, the student must contact ACM to request a Change of Circumstance form, complete the form and submit it to registry@acm.ac.uk  In the absence of written notification of a change, the student shall be deemed to be enrolled and, as such, liable for the payment of tuition fees for the academic year. Further details on the Change of Circumstances procedure can be found in ACM’s Withdrawal, Interruption and Internal Transfer Policy. 

2.23 The fee schedule for the relevant academic year confirms a student’s individual fee liability based on the date of withdrawal or interruption. International students are required to pay each academic year’s fees in full prior to the start date of the relevant academic year. 

2.24 Where exceptional circumstances have arisen, ACM may review the fee liability for an individual student. Exceptional Circumstances would cover cases of bereavement, critical illness and other severe medical and social circumstances that would prevent a student being able to complete studies and benefit from the cost of education. 

2.25 In the matter of the recovery of the outstanding programme fees, ACM will consider each student on a case-by-case basis. The options which may be applied in each case are: 

  • Fee remission, where students are permitted a part or full tuition fee waiver; 
  • Charge for the full Annual Tuition fee for the current academic year; 
  • Charge for the full Annual Tuition fee for all years of the program attended. 

2.26 Where payment has been made in excess of the tuition fee charged (including non-refundable deposits) the overpayment will not be refunded for an interrupting student. Any credit balance may be carried forward to be applied against future tuition fee charges. The credit may be carried forward for up to one academic year. 

2.27 When an interrupted student returns to study in the subsequent year, ACM will charge the student the relevant fee for that course and Year of Study for the relevant Academic year. This may result in a student incurring a higher or lower fee upon return. 

Fee waivers, Scholarships and Bursaries 

2.28 ACM offers fee waivers in the form of scholarships and bursaries. Details of these can be found on the ACM website or via separate communication. Please refer to the relevant terms and conditions. 

2.29 Applicants who successfully secured a fee waiver, scholarships or Bursary and leave the course early or defer entry will have the funding provided by ACM pro-rata for the period attended. 

Debt policy and procedures 

2.30 Failure to pay tuition fees or any other charges on time may result in various connected services including access to tutorials, rehearsal space/studio bookings, and career development services being withdrawn, and access to ACM buildings may be denied. 

2.31 ACM reserves the right to withhold award certificates and/or assessment results, where arrears of tuition fees exist. 

2.32 Students who are unable to pay any fees or charges by the appropriate due date are encouraged to contact studentfinance@acm.ac.uk  at the earliest opportunity, as help may be available. ACM will be sympathetic and assist where it can. However, the quality of teaching is dependent upon funding and so it must act to recover all outstanding debts. The Student Finance Team will be able to give advice on sources of funding available including Hardship loans. 

2.33 If your financial circumstances change after you start your course, then you may be able to agree to a non-standard instalment plan. To find out, contact the Student Finance team: 

Please note that documentary evidence to support your request will be required before it can be considered. Please have this information to hand when contacting us. 

De-registration for nonpayment of tuition fees 

2.34 Students who fail to pay their tuition fees, maintain an agreed payment plan or provide confirmation of sponsorship will be suspended at the end of learning week six. For students who fail to pay their tuition fee instalments in Term 2, suspension will take place at the end of the sixth teaching week in Term 2. For students who fail to pay their tuition fee instalments in Term 3, suspension will take place at the end of the sixth teaching week in Term 3. The option to pay by instalments, available at the start of the academic year, may no longer be available. 

2.35 Following suspension enacted for non-payment of tuition fees or for non-confirmation of sponsorship, ACM will start the de-registration process if no acceptable provisions have been made to secure funding, make payments or confirm sponsorship. Such provisions must be made within the six-week period following suspension for the de-registration process to be reviewed. Provisions must be evidenced and acceptable to ACM. It is the student’s responsibility to keep ACM informed of their funding status and of any provisions being made to secure funding or sponsorship. The option to pay by instalments, available at the start of the academic year, may no longer be available. 

2.36 Any student who has been de-registered will be liable for tuition fees up to the point of de-registration, as per paragraph 2.21 of this policy. 

Late payment charges 

2.37 Students who fail to pay their tuition fees or provide confirmation of sponsorship on or before payment deadlines will be subject to a £200.00 late payment charge. This late payment charge will be payable on each occurrence of default, including the first instalment. 

Financial Holds 

2.38 If you have a tuition fee debt that becomes overdue, holds will be applied to your student account automatically. Holds are designed to prevent access to certain facilities and services, depending on the age and value of the tuition fee debt. The hold types and their effects are as follows: 

Hold severity Effects of holds
Overdue tuition fee debt Stage 1  There is a financial obligation to ACM that takes place within the first six weeks of enrolment, within the first six weeks of Term 2 or within the first six weeks of Term 3 (whichever shall apply with regard to the debt). Payment or proof of sponsorship must be provided. No restrictions are applied.
Overdue tuition fee debt Stage 2 You will be suspended from your programme at Week 6 of your enrolment, at the sixth week of Term 2 or at the sixth week of Term 3 (whichever shall apply with regard to the debt). You will not be permitted to attend lectures or campus, or engage with any assessment activities. You will not be permitted to attend extra-curricular activities and any additional privileges (e.g. student ambassadorship) will be revoked for the duration of the suspension. During this suspension you will not be able to re‐enrol, change modules or module components, or apply for a new programme. You will not be able to view your final assessment and grade results, and progressions and programme results. 
Overdue tuition fee debt Stage 3 De-registration will take place at Week 12 of your enrolment, at the twelfth week of Term 2 or at the twelfth week of Term 3 (whichever shall apply to the debt). You will not be able to view your final assessment and grade results, and progressions and programme results. You will not be able to graduate if you have outstanding debts.

Returning students with debt 

2.39 Students with outstanding debts from a previous academic year may not be permitted to re-enrol or resume their studies. All debts should be paid in full ahead of the following academic year. 

External debt collection agencies 

2.40 ACM reserves the right to refer debt in respect of any alumni or ex-student to a county court and/or external debt collection agency for recovery. 

Refunds 

2.41 If a self-financing student has paid up front for the academic year and subsequently chooses to withdraw or interrupt, the student can claim for a refund of any fees paid ahead of the liability point. 

2.42 Refunds can only be applied for once the withdrawal process has been completed and any refund of tuition fees will take effect from the date the Change Request form is authorised. ACM’s Student Engagement or Student Finance team will confirm the new fee liability as part of this change process. 

2.43 Tuition fee refunds and other monies paid to ACM are only refunded to the individual or organisation that paid ACM originally. Refunds should be processed within 2 weeks of the request being received by ACM finance. 

2.44 Where fees have been paid by the Student Loan Company, any refunds due will be paid to the Student Loans Company thereby reducing the value of the loan secured by the individual student. 

2.45 ACM will confirm any fee changes to the Student Loans Company directly upon confirmation of a Change Request Form being submitted in writing. 

2.46 For the purposes of tuition fees, only monies paid to ACM will be refunded. Any scholarships or fee waivers awarded by ACM will be excluded from any refund. 

2.47 Refunds will not be made in cash or by banker’s draft. 

Anti-money laundering regulations 

2.48 ACM will not accept any payment from persons or organisations unless they relate to a valid charge, levied or impending. This is to comply with UK Money Laundering regulations. Any suspicious payments and or refund requests may be reported to the appropriate regulating body. 

2.49 ACM will not accept Tuition Fee payments in cash to ensure compliance with the UK Money Laundering regulations. 

Library Charges, Materials and Other Equipment 

2.50 Students using the Library and/or borrowing equipment of any type have an obligation to respect the rights of others by returning library and other equipment on time. To encourage this, fines are charged on items that are returned late and sanctions may be imposed for non-payment. 

Fee Complaints 

2.51 Students who wish to dispute a debt must submit their dispute within 21 days of receiving a request for payment. The dispute must be in writing and forwarded to studentfinance@acm.ac.uk  Please include attachments of any supporting evidence. Any fee complaint will be handled in line with ACM’s Student Complaints and Grievances Policy and Student Complaints and Grievances Procedure. 

  1. POLICY SCOPE 

3.1 This Policy applies to students at ACM Guildford, ACM Birmingham and ACM London studying across all levels, less the exceptions outlined in 3.2 and 3.3 below. 

3.2 This Policy does not apply to students studying at Level 2 or Level 3 who are aged 18 or under on the start date of their programme, and are eligible for UK government funding for FE programmes. 

3.3 This Policy does not apply to students studying at Level 2 or Level 3 under an Educational Health Care Plan (EHCP) for which they are eligible for UK government funding. 

  1. RELATED POLICIES 
  • Withdrawal Interruption and Internal Transfer Policy 
  • Refunds and Compensation Policy 
  • Student Protection Plan 
  1. POLICY OWNER 

5.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Academic Board. The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework. The Academic Board delegates operational responsibility of this Policy to ACM’s Finance and Registry departments. 

  1. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW 
Version 2.3
Approved on 01 September 2025
Approved by Academic Board
Date of next review August 2026

 

Download: 017 POL_017_Finance_202407

External Speaker Code of Conduct

1. Introduction:

This code of conduct exists to provide guidance of legal obligations relating to external speakers and events at ACM, and to ensure that all speakers taking part in an event or activity, on an ACM campus or elsewhere in relation to ACM, act in accordance with the ACM External Speaker and Events Policy.

It is the responsibility of the event or activity organiser – the individual, named in the External Speaker submission form and the ACM Industry Link team to ensure that:

  • The External Speaker Code of Conduct is communicated to all external speakers (once approved and confirmed via the External Speaker Booking Process) and the declaration form is signed, returned and stored centrally with the respective booking form.
  • That all reasonable steps are taken to ensure that the requirements within it are upheld during the running of the event or activity.

2. Freedom of speech:

Freedom of speech is fundamental to ACM as a Higher Education provider. The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires ACM to take such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure that freedom of speech, within the law, is secured for its employees, students and visiting speakers. All staff and students through their membership are expected to tolerate and protect the expression of opinions, within the law.

Whilst the law promotes and protects freedom of speech, it also places limits on those freedoms in order to maintain public order and safety. ACM acknowledges that it has a legal responsibility to create a balance between minimising the possibility that extremism or unlawful conduct will arise on an ACM campus and ensuring that it meets its legal obligations in relation to securing freedom of speech.

3. Conduct 

ACM expects external speakers to act in accordance with the law and not to breach the lawful rights of others. Set out below are examples of the expectations, this is by no means an exhaustive list.

During the course of the event at which he or she participates, no speaker shall:

  • Incite hatred, intolerance or violence or act in any way that is a breach of the Criminal Law.
  • Encourage or promote any acts of terrorism or promote individuals, groups or organisations that support terrorism.
  • Discriminate against or harass any person or group on the grounds of their sex, race, nationality, ethnicity, disability, religious or other similar belief, sexual orientation or age.
  • Defame any person or organisation.
  • Raise or gather funds for any external organisation or cause without express permission of the Director of Creative Industry Development.

ACM reserves the right to not permit an external speaker to speak at or attend an event, to refuse to permit an event and/or to halt an event at any time if it reasonably considers there may be a breach of the External Speaker and Events Policy or of any legal obligation.

4. Segregation

ACM as a Higher Education provider, employer and service provider has duties under the Equality Act 2010 and Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023. ACM will not unlawfully discriminate against students, employees and other individuals to whom services are provided.

Segregation by sex or gender is not permitted in any academic meetings or at events, lectures provided for students, or at events attended by members of the public or employees of ACM. Segregation is therefore not permissible for any event covered by the ACM External Speaker and Events Policy and this Code of Conduct.

5. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                        1.3

Approved on:               01 Sep 2025

Approved by:               Academic Board

Next Review:               August 2026

Download this code of conduct

The .pdf version linked above contains the ACM ‘External Speakers and Code of Conduct Declaration Form’, which needs to be read and signed by all external speakers to ACM.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student Protection Plan

  1. PURPOSE 

The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to  maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material  change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions, closures, or institutional closure. This policy  statement outlines the plan in place. 

  1. POLICY DETAILS 

Provider’s name: ACM Guildford Ltd, trading as ACM 

Provider’s UKPRN:10067853 

Legal Address: Rodboro Buildings, Bridge Street, Guildford, GU1 4SB 

Contact point for enquiries about this student protection plan: 

exec@acm.ac.uk 

01483 500840

 

Student Protection Plan, effective from 2025/26 

  1. Introduction 

1.1 ACM is committed to helping ensure students achieve the best academic outcomes from  their studies. Events may occasionally occur which mean that unforeseen changes have to  be made to modules or programmes.  

1.2 The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to  maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material  change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions, closures, or institutional closure. 

1.3 These events may be triggered by situations such as (but not limited to): 

  • significant material change; 
  • a decision to close the institution has been taken; 
  • a strategic decision by the institution to close a course or campus; 
  • withdrawal of designation for student support services; 
  • a decision is taken to not run a course for the subsequent year; 
  • major changes in year to course content; 
  • changes to regulatory framework affecting a specific course; 
  • loss of accreditation from regulatory bodies; 
  • disruption of institutional activity (e.g. temporary disruption within term-time not  covered by any of the above; 
  • industrial action by institution staff or third parties; 
  • the unanticipated departure of key members of institution staff. 

1.4 This plan lays out the measures that ACM, and where applicable its validating university  partner, will take in order to protect the student interests and assure continuity of study in the  event of course campus or Institution change or closure.

  1. An assessment of the range of risks to the continuation for students, how those  risks may differ based on students’ needs, characteristics and circumstances, and  the likelihood that those risks would materialise: 

2.1 Major changes in year to course content 

2.1.1 ACM delivers a relatively small portfolio of programmes within the area of music and  the wider creative industries; an area that is generally considered to be rapidly evolving and  changing. In order to ensure that programme content and learning outcomes remain fit for  purpose and relevant it may be necessary for us to make changes to course content. The  design of the programmes is such that flexibility is accommodated within the module  learning outcomes so that major changes to course content are not normally necessary and  can easily be accommodated with no negative impact to the student experience. However, it  is possible that a major change may be necessary to ensure that a programme remains fit  for purpose. In such cases appropriate measures will be put in place, as outlined below.  

2.2. Closure of an individual programme 

2.2.1 ACM’s programme strategy is such that the majority of students at the institution are  on one of a small number of awards rather than small numbers on many different  programmes. Consequently, programme closure is considered an unlikely event and  historically this has proven to be the case. 

2.2.2 It is possible that where there might be insufficient numbers on an individual discipline  within a course it may be necessary to close a particular pathway prior to commencement.  However, whilst there is no precedence for this happening and it is also considered low risk,  should such a situation occur appropriate measures are outlined below. 

2.2.3 Currently there are no plans or proposed strategies to close individual programmes for  other reasons. 

2.3. Closure of a specific site or campus 

2.3.1 Institutional failure will be monitored through risk management in accordance with HE  regulatory bodies. This monitoring assesses the financial sustainability management and  governance of the institution. Following a sale of the registered entity in May 2025 the risk of  a specific site closure is marked as medium risk. The risk rating has been raised from low to  medium in June 2025 following the sale of the registered entity and de-coupling from its  former parent company, ACM Commercial Ltd. The parent company held leases for several  buildings used by students and ACM Guildford Ltd is currently re-negotiating leases with  landlords to mitigate the risk of the closure of buildings. 

2.3.2 ACM operates campus locations in Guildford, Birmingham and London. Whilst the  institution-level risk rating is medium, this differentiates for each campus location. Despite  the global risk rating being marked as medium, it is not considered a risk that a specific  location will be removed or forced to close due to the advanced status of negotiations on at  least one building in each location.

2.3.3 The Birmingham site closure is low risk. ACM operates two buildings in Birmingham  and both have the lease assigned to ACM Guildford Ltd. 

2.3.4 The Guildford site closure is currently medium risk. ACM operates three buildings used  by higher education students in Guildford. The lease of one building (the Bridge) is assigned  to ACM Guildford Ltd. The leases of the two other buildings (Rodboro and the Billings) are  currently assigned to ACM Commercial Ltd but ACM Guildford Ltd are at an advanced stage  of re-negotiations with Head of Terms produced and agreed. The expectation is that leases  will be re-assigned before the start of the 25/26 academic year. Once the new leases have  been signed this risk rating will return to low. 

2.3.5 The London site closure is currently medium risk. ACM operates two buildings in  London, both of which are current leased by ACM Commercial Ltd. Advanced negotiations  are in place for the Bromells Road building in Clapham with heads of terms agreed and  contracts being produced. This is expected to be concluded before the 25/26 academic year.  Negotiations are yet to begin on the Brixton House building in Brixton as the landlord is  concluding discussions and the end to the current lease with former parent company, ACM  Commercial Ltd before embarking on a tendering exercise for a new tenant lease. Whilst  ACM Guildford Ltd hope to gain access to the building through a new tendering exercise it is  considered high risk at present for this building specifically. Mitigations have been put in  place to ensure student facilities are unaffected with equipment and resources moved to the  Bromells Road site ensuring a comparable student experience which gives an overall  medium risk level for the London campus location.  

2.3.6 Currently there are no plans or proposed strategy to close sites or campuses for other  reasons.  

2.3.7 Following the impact of the Coronavirus in early 2020, plans were put in place to  continue delivery through provision of remote learning, and to keep ACM campuses open for  staff and other services. Whilst it is difficult to predict events of this nature the aim will  always be to continue programme delivery wherever possible.  

2.4 Withdrawal or non-renewal of validation 

2.4.1 ACM current validation agreement with Middlesex University has been in place for  nearly 20 years and such withdrawal or non-renewal of validation is considered a low risk. 

2.4.2 Middlesex University remain an engaged partner and have signalled support for ACM  Guildford Ltd who intend to apply for probationary degree awarding powers during the 25/26  academic year. Student contracts have been redrafted to enable ACM awards to be  awarded in the event of degree awarding powers being in place, or Middlesex University  awards to be awarded in the event degree awarding powers are not in place for ACM  Guildford Ltd. Middlesex University have signalled on-going support through the degree  awarding powers process. 

2.4.3 ACM has, in the past, worked with more than one university validating partner and has  experienced non-renewal of validation following change in strategic direction of the  university. In such a case appropriate measures were put in place to ensure students were  not disadvantaged. Whilst withdrawal or non-renewal is not currently considered a high risk,  should such an event occur appropriate measures have been considered below.

2.5 Institutional closure 

2.5.1 Institutional failure is monitored through risk management in accordance with HE  regulatory bodies. This monitoring assesses the financial sustainability management and  governance of the institution. This includes an external audit process that takes place at the  end of each financial year. For the most recent completed financial year, ending in August  2024, the auditors were satisfied and have signed off on ACM’s accounts as a going  concern. 

2.5.2 Whilst ACM has no strategic plans for partial or full institutional closure, the current  higher education landscape, and ACM’s recent change of ownership means that the risk  level for institutional closure has been assessed as medium. 

2.6 Loss of key staff 

2.6.1 ACM employs a large number of specialist teaching staff, both as contracted  employees and sessional staff. Many of these have high profile careers with national and  international reputations. Staff profiles are provided on the ACM websites and in other  promotional material although tutors are not promoted as being linked to a specific module  or class and no implication that students will be taught by a specific member of staff is given. 

2.6.2 Recruitment strategy ensures that the tutor faculty typically has multiple staff covering  specific subject areas thereby reducing any potential risk to the student experience through  loss of key teaching staff. 

2.6.3 Management and governance strategy is primarily based on senior and executive staff  teams contributing to the management and oversight of activities rather than through the  apex of a single member of staff or principal. This ensures broad engagement of  stakeholders and the effective use of expertise, whilst minimising risks that might be  attached to the loss of key staff. 

2.6.4 This is therefore considered low risk. 

2.7 Failure to achieve or maintain (after the DAPs probationary period has ended)  authorisation for DAPs 

2.7.1 If ACM does not achieve or maintain degree-awarding powers, ACM will continue with  its existing validation partnership agreement with Middlesex University.  

2.7.2 The failure to achieve or maintain degree awarding powers is considered medium risk  during the scrutiny process. However, appropriate mitigations have been put in place, with  the existing validating partner being maintained to ensure a validated programme is  available to students in the event of ACM’s degree awarding powers being revoked or not  granted.

  1. The measures put in place to mitigate those risks considered feasible 

N.B. These are not necessarily risks considered likely to happen (as outlined above).  However, measures have been considered regardless. 

3.1 Major changes in year to course content 

3.1.1 ACM will use all reasonable endeavours to deliver the programme in accordance with  the description provided in the ACM prospectus or other material provided, for the academic  year in which a student began their programme. 

3.1.2 Major and minor changes to programmes are approved in accordance with academic  regulations, with changes becoming effective from the subsequent academic year. 

3.1.3.In the event where changes to course content do take place in-year, this will not  include variations to learning outcomes. ACM will ensure that changes are restricted to the  minimum necessary to achieve the required quality of experience, and affected students are  notified and consulted as appropriate and provided with a rationale as to why a change  might be needed. 

3.1.4 Where necessary it will allow students the opportunity to withdraw from the programme  and where required offer reasonable support to transfer to another programme at ACM, or to  another provider.  

3.2 Closure of an individual programme 

3.2.1 In the event that it is necessary to suspend or close a course and where there is a  material impact on students, the effect will be mitigated by: 

  • communication with current students to provide assurance that they will not be  adversely affected by the decision and provide assurance that they are able to  complete their studies at the institution;  
  • consultation with stakeholders who may be affected to ensure appropriate equality  impact assessments will also be undertaken; 
  • future applicants will be notified in accordance with UCAS deadlines, allowing time  for students to source alternative suitable programme (where relevant) at ACM.  

3.3 Closure of a specific site or campus 

3.3.1 Where ACM has no option, other than to close a specific building, site or campus, the  following measures will be considered: 

  • where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner over a period that would  enable current students to complete their studies at the original campus location the  student has selected. If a single or multiple building(s) close within a campus  location, efforts will be made to ensure the same level of equipment and facilities are  available across the remaining buildings at a campus location where possible. 
  • where it is not possible to continue operating in a transitional manner, in supporting  students to transfer to appropriate programmes within the ACM portfolio at a different  campus location, or at other suitable providers, and (where appropriate financially) by compensating students where, because of disruption to their studies, they suffer  demonstrable, material financial loss.3.3.2 Where part of a campus is rendered unusable for activities involving students, ACM  will typically consider the following measures: 
    • relocating provision to an alternative location, this may include hiring spaces for  programme delivery (where possible nearby) and /or installing temporary buildings;
    • revising timetabling to allow all of the scheduled teaching to take part in the available  facilities. This may include timetabling sessions being held outside of normal  teaching hours. Where such an approach is taken, appropriate consultation will  normally be conducted with stakeholders who may be affected; 
    • undertaking appropriate equality impact assessment.  

    3.4 Withdrawal or non-renewal of validation 

    3.4.1 In the event of withdrawal or non-renewal of validation ACM will take all reasonable  steps to minimise the resulting disruption to students by, for example:  

    • working with the validating partner to allow enrolled students to complete their  programme at their existing campus location through a ‘teach-out’ arrangement;
    • working with a new university partner to provide validation of the programme, or  comparable programme; 
    • where either of the above is not possible, supporting students to transfer to  programmes at other providers and, where appropriate, financially compensating  students where they suffer demonstrable, material financial loss because of  disruption to their studies.  

    3.5 Institutional closure 

    3.5.1 Where ACM has no option, other than full institutional closure, the following measures  will be considered in the following order: 

    1. where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner over a period that would  enable current students to complete their studies at the institution; 
    2. where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner until the end of the  current academic year that would enable students to complete their studies or gain  an exit award. During this transition period, efforts will be made to find a credible  buyer to take ownership of ACM Guildford Ltd and its subsidiaries. 
    3. If a credible buyer cannot be found that will enable continuity of the student  experience, ACM will enable the validating institution (if under validation  arrangements) to continue teaching students on existing programmes at ACM sites,  or a suitable alternative location. To achieve this ACM will ensure student data,  programme information and materials, staff (as appropriate), facilities and resources  (where possible) and forthcoming tuition fee income are made available to the  validating institution. 
    4. If the validating institution is not able to undertake delivery itself, or if ACM is not in a  validation partnership at the time of institutional closure, or it is not possible to continue operating in a transitional manner, ACM or the validating institution will  support students to transfer to appropriate programmes at other suitable providers.
      1. where is it not possible for students to continue studying in a transitional manner with  ACM, its validating institution, or a suitable alternative provider, ACM will seek to  compensate students for tuition fees pertaining to outstanding credits at the point of  institutional closure, if possible, within the boundaries of the administration process 

      3.6 Loss of key staff 

      3.6.1 Where possible ACM will: 

      • Seek to fill gaps as quickly as possible, by moving other current members of staff  with appropriate skills and experience, into the vacant post(s) or recruiting externally,  to avoid disruption; 
      • Where ACM cannot avoid closing a programme, due to loss of key staff, the policy as  outlined in section 3.2 will apply.  
      1. Information about the policy in place to refund tuition fees and other relevant costs  to your students and to provide compensation where necessary in the event that you  are no longer able to preserve continuity. 

      4.1 Information regarding Refunds and Compensation Policy is made available to  prospective students and applicants via ACM’s website (www.acm.ac.uk/policies/) as well as  included within ACM’s internal assets, such as the student-facing virtual learning  environment. The policy is subject to a cyclical period of review, to align with the review and  update of all ACM’s policies and procedures, ensuring consistency and alignment with  current practice. 

      1. Information about how ACM will communicate with students about the student  protection plan 

      5.1 Students will be provided access to the Student Protection Plan via the public website  and the student portal. 

      5.2 Students have representation within the committee structure in which we would normally  expect activity likely to impact on student experience and their programme of study to be  discussed.  

      5.3 Should the protection plan need to be implemented students will be contacted by a  member of the senior management team at the earliest opportunity following a decision that  an applicable change was decided upon or notified to the institution.  

      5.4 ACM will take reasonable steps to avoid implementing change during an academic year  or making changes close to the start of an academic year.  

      5.5 ACM will undertake to update the website and presence on UCAS and other institutional  listing services at the earliest opportunity on notification of a significant change. 

  1. Student involvement in the review of the plan 

6.1 Students will have the opportunity to contribute to a review of the plan (including the  Refunds and Compensation policy) to ensure that their views, interests and needs are taken  into account. 

6.2 The plan will be reviewed annually, with student involvement, before its publication for  students enrolled on the 2025/26 academic year. 

6.3 Student engagement in the review will be undertaken through the formal student voice  meetings on an annual basis. The meetings have student representatives from across all  programmes and sites.  

6.4 Where variations to the plan take place in-year, students will be able to view the revised  plan once a version has been approved by the regulator. 

  1. Complaints 

7.1 Students who are dissatisfied with ACM may wish to make use of ACM’s complaints and  grievances procedure. ACM seeks to resolve all complaints and grievances in a timely  manner through considered escalation of concerns as outlined in ACM’s Complaints and  Grievances procedure, which is available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

  1. POLICY SCOPE 

8.1 The policy applies to ACM Guildford Ltd campuses (Guildford, Birmingham and London)  registered with the OfS on Middlesex University validated higher education programmes and  students, staff, applicants, associate members, visitors and contractors connected to those  campuses and those programmes. 

  1. RELATED POLICIES 

9.1 ACM Refunds and Compensation Policy is available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

  1. POLICY OWNER 

10.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Senior Management Team. The  responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under  ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework. 

10.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be  authorised by the Accountable Officer.

  1. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW Version: 1.7 

Version: 1.7

Approved on: 10 September 2025 

Approved by: Senior Management Team

Download this policy here: ACM Student Protection Plan 

Policy 043: Critical Incident

Policy 043: Critical Incident

1. Purpose and Scope

1.1 This policy sets out ACM’s approach for handling an emergency situation that affects the ACM community that may occur in or out of teaching hours, weekends and during holidays.

1.2 A critical incident may involve both internal and external factors that may include hazards and events that pose direct or imminent threat to the safety, security and wellbeing of ACM students and staff.

1.3 This policy outlines the management plan for critical incidents as they may occur while students are undertaking their study during nominal teaching hours, and ensures that ACM is equipped to provide meaningful support to all students and staff affected by an incident.

1.4 The policy provides guidance to actions which should be considered by Executive Management, the Senior Management Team, and the Critical Incident Management Team (CIMT) in case of an emergency within ACM or the local community, or on an educational visit.

1.5 This policy gives clear guidance regarding the circumstances under which the policy would be enacted. The Designated Safeguarding Lead, on assessment of all factors, and individuals directly or indirectly involved, would exercise judgment over the policy’s activation and implementations.

2. Policy Statement

Critical Incidents

2.1 ACM  is committed to emergency planning to ensure the safety of its members and the smooth running of its business.

2.2 It is important to the success of emergency planning at the institution that its community is aware both of the central responsibilities and commitments in the case of a critical incident on campus, but also of local responsibilities and information outlets.

2.3 A critical incident is a sudden event or situation which may put staff and students under stress both physically and emotionally. In assessing a critical incident, consideration must be given to the existing factors and the impact on staff and students. It must also be considered with regard to the scope, and the wider public impact.

2.4 In general terms, a critical incident is defined as a traumatic event which causes or is likely to cause extreme physical and/or emotional distress to staff and/or students and may be regarded as outside the normal range of experience of the people affected. This may include, but is not limited to events involving ACM students and staff, where there has been:

  • Extremist acts of aggression
  • Serious injury or death
  • Physical or sexual assault
  • Violence or threats of violence
  • Hold up, attempted robbery
  • Sudden or unexpected death or suicide of a member of the ACM community
  • Natural disasters
  • Fire, explosion, bomb threats
  • High publicity violent crimes
  • Any incident that is charged with extreme emotion.
  • Any fatality, near fatality or incident likely to affect seriously a number of staff and/or students
  • Serious traffic accidents
  • Major theft or vandalism
  • A student reported as a missing person.

2.5 Every critical incident is unique and will need to be dealt with differently, according to the needs of the people affected.

Critical Incident Management Team (CIMT)

2.7 The CIMT is responsible for:

  • The initial and ongoing assessment of the scale, duration and impact of the critical incident;
  • Establishing ACM’s operational and business critical priorities in responding to the incident;
  • The allocation of staff and resources;
  • The management of, and support, of any ACM representatives who are responsible for the planning, management, and response taken by ACM;
  • Liaison with external agencies as needed.
  • Note: any suspected extremist based acts of terrorism, including threats physical spaces and the community, or cyber based threats must be reported to the ACM Police immediately. The Prevent Lead will contact the Police to discuss arrangements for the handling of these matters which may or may not involve the CIMT.

2.8 In the longer term, the CIMT will support the Senior Management Team to ensure adequate implementation of:

  • Institutional reputation management;
  • Long-term business recovery;
  • Financial control;
  • Corporate priorities;
  • Community engagement;
  • Decisions relating to long-term staffing needs, which may result from an emergency or sustained disruption to area’s of ACM’s business needs.

2.9 The CIMT with normally comprise of 3-5 members, including:

  • A member of Executive Management
  • Two Members of Senior Management Team

And may include:

  • ACM Designated Safeguarding Lead (DSL)
  • ACM PREVENT Duty Lead
  • A member of student support services
  • A member of the education team
  • A member of the marketing team
  • Student Representatives

2.10 Depending on the nature of the incident, the CIMT may be expanded to include Heads of department (or their nominees) with specific responsibilities within the impacted areas.

Activation of the Policy

2.10 Information about an incident may come from a staff member, student, parent, the emergency services or the local authority.

2.11 The staff member who receives the notification should be mindful to request and make a record of as much information provided as possible:

  • The name of the person who has reported the incident
  • The specific incident details
  • Who, if anyone, has also been informed (for example, any emergency services)
  • The exact location of the incident
  • Details of any casualties
  • What, if any, action has been taken so far
  • A name of a contact at the scene, and their contact details
  • What further assistance, if any, is needed

Staff and Student Welfare

2.12 ACM takes the responsibility towards staff and students seriously, with student and staff welfare considered a priority.

2.13 Where there is an occurrence of a critical incident, welfare and well being of all affected individuals should be considered, with individuals who have been particularly adversely affected identified for additional support, should they wish to engage with it.

2.14. The diversity of staff and students should be taken into account when considering additional support, including considering contact with leaders within local faith communities.

2.15 Support which is accessed and made available after an incident may be referred to as Post-Incident Care. This is aimed at helping individuals to understand their feelings following an emergency and to identify sources of future support. The overall aim of the support is to help people in a way that will reduce the possibility of developing long-term effects and difficulties as a result of a critical incident.

Communication

2.16 Effective communication is integral to the successful management of any critical incident. It should include effective information exchange within the response team, engagement with staff, students and others immediately affected by the incident, and liaison with the wider public via the media where necessary. Crisis messaging must be managed with the utmost care and sensitivity after the initial incident.

2.17 Communication surrounding any incident should  focus on mitigating the effects of the incident on those who are directly involved. Relevant information will be shared with those who are impacted by the incident. It is vital to ensure that all communication is conducted in a manner that protects the interests and privacy of those involved.

2.18 Post-incident communication will focus on encouraging an orderly return to normal operations in a manner that protects the interests and privacy of those who were involved. Its scope includes, but is not restricted to, providing reminders to the community on how individuals can access support, including Medical Services and Counselling Services, and how members of the community can become involved in any post incident analysis.

2.19 By necessity, communication will be influenced by the nature of the critical incident. A communications plan will be developed by the CIMT to ensure that a clear communication protocol that outlines the responsibilities for the development and implementation of both internal and external communications.

2.20 Following an incident, the Senior Management Team should ensure that all ACM staff are fully briefed on facts and are aware of what information can be disclosed to the wider community, including media representatives.

2.21 Staff should be made aware of confirmed facts relating to incidents, and what information is authorised to be released. They should also be made aware of the potential problems caused by the spread of misinformation through word of mouth, media and social media platforms.

2.22 Designated staff, approved by Executive Management in consultation with the CIMT will are given responsibility to speak to external stakeholders, organisations, and media in relation to the incident. In some cases this may also be informed by the Police and other Government agencies. This does not preclude ACM student’s or employee’s right to freedom of speech, but does ensure that official communication is consistent and equitable.

3. Responsible Parties

3.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of the policy in liaison with the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager. The Critical Incident Policy lead is:

  • ACM Designated Safeguarding Lead

3.2 The Senior Management Team are responsible for ensuring staff awareness and effective implementation of the Critical Incident Policy.

3.3 Implementation and compliance with the Policy, and corresponding Procedure will be overseen by the following staff:

  • Executive Management
  • Senior Management
  • Education Management
  • Designated Safeguarding Lead
  • PREVENT Duty Lead
  • Human Resources Department

4. Reference Points

4.1 Internal:

  • Emergency Closure Policy
  • Safeguarding Policy
  • Health and Safety Policy
  • Content Approval Policy
  • ACM Prevent Policy

4.2. External:

  • Civil Contingencies Act 2004
  • Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015
  • Revised Prevent Duty Guidance: for England and Wales
  • Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007

5. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                        1.1

Approved on:               03 September 2024

Approved by:               Academic Board

Next Review:                August 2025

Download POL_043_Critical Incident Policy_170728

Policy 004: Student Conduct and Discipline

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: anddegree@acm.ac.uk 

Policy 004: STUDENT CONDUCT & DISCIPLINE

  1.   Introduction 

1.1 Statement of Student Conduct – as an ACM student, you are expected to conduct yourself at all times in a manner which demonstrates respect for the institution, your fellow students and its staff. You are an ambassador for the institution and you are expected to behave in a way that enhances the reputation of ACM and all of its students and graduates, and in a way that is sensitive to our culturally diverse environment. You are encouraged, with the support of ACM, to engage actively in the learning process, to be fully committed to your studies and determined to succeed. 

1.2 This policy describes the procedure ACM uses for dealing with incidents of non-academic misconduct (hereafter referred to as ‘misconduct’). Within the rules, types of misconduct and consequences are described as the warning and sanction system. 

  1.   Rationale for the Rules

2.1 These Rules are intended to provide fair and orderly procedures for maintaining reasonable student conduct and behaviour whilst enrolled at ACM. The rules and regulations of the institution, which require students to conduct themselves appropriately and which enable ACM to discipline students in the event of misconduct, form part of the terms of the contract between the parties, which students become a party to on enrolment to ACM. 

2.2 These Rules should also be read in conjunction with the Student Charter (Code of Conduct) which sets out what a student can expect from ACM and what ACM expects of its students.

2.3 The Rules will be used to protect the right of all students to pursue freedom of speech within the law, argument, discussion and activities proper to their study in further and higher education, whichever is applicable to their status. All students are encouraged to participate in debate and in a wide range of activities, whether this is directly related to their own study programmes or to matters of wider community and public interest. Equally, all students are expected to respect the rights of others to study, to work and to participate freely in the life of the institution. This is consistent with ACM’s values, with the traditions of further and higher education, and with freedoms of speech and association in a democratic society.

2.4 ACM is committed to treating all students fairly and to not make presumptions prior to collating evidence. ACM recognises the various duties and obligations it has to all students, including applying the principles of natural justice, i.e. the right of students to a fair hearing before an impartial decision-maker or decision-makers. 

2.5 It is the intention of these Rules to encourage the development of mutual respect between all members of the ACM community. To this end, it is important that students exercise their rights responsibly and with respect for others, thereby contributing to the orderly running of the institution as a whole. This is the context in which these Rules and procedures should be read and used. 

2.6 The Rules are set out in clear stages so as to be a guide to students and to staff. Except in the case of serious offences, the penalties are intended to operate as a series of warnings. 

2.7 ACM seeks to process disciplinary cases in a timely manner through considered escalation of concerns as outlined in this procedure. Cases will normally be completed within 90 calendar days, including any appeal stage. If the normal timeframe needs to be extended, ACM will inform the student, explain why and update them regularly on progress. 

  1.   Types of Student Misconduct and Consequences 

3.1 The table below sets out the types of behaviours which ACM defines as non-academic misconduct. These are separated into misconduct against ACM, misconduct against property, misconduct against a person, and misconduct against the community. It is important to note that the behaviours listed in the table are not exhaustive. 

3.2 ACM uses a system of sanctions (warning points) ranging from 0-4 to quantify the level of consequence as a result of the misconduct. The final column in the below table gives an indication of the range of the number of warning points such a behaviour is likely to carry. The number of warning points indicated next to the behaviour is for guidance purposes only as an indication to the gravity of the misconduct. Section 9 provides further information on the warning system. 

3.3 Table of types of misconduct and consequences 

Misconduct against ACM 
Types of Misconduct Examples of Misconduct Level of Warning
Obstruction of the working of ACM
  • Acts/omissions/statements intended to deceive the institution (e.g. withholding information required for statutory purposes). 
  • Disruption of the functions, duties or activities of any student or employee of ACM or any authorised visitor to the institution 
  • Disruption of the workings of ACM: 
  • Administrative (e.g. refusal to present a student ID card when requested by an employee of the institution or misuse of a student ID card 
  • Breach of booking/guest policies/procedures 
  • Breach of exclusion/suspension conditions 
  • Academic (e.g. disruption of teaching or learning environment through the usage of a mobile phone)
  • Extra-curricular or social (e.g. disruption at an ACM-related internal or external event) 
0 – 2  

0 – 4 

0 – 2 

0 – 4 

0 – 4 

0 – 4 

0 – 4 

Reputational damage
  • Behaviour which could damage the reputation of ACM or bring ACM into disrepute (e.g. anti-social behaviour within the community). 
  • Behaviour which has damaged the reputation of the ACM or brought ACM into disrepute.
0 – 2 

2 – 4

Fraudulent or 

deceitful behaviour

  • Fraud/attempted fraud, bribery, deceit, deception or dishonesty in relation to ACM or its staff or in connection with holding any office in the institution or in relation to being a student of ACM. 
  • Knowingly making a false and vexatious allegation against ACM or against any student or staff member. 
  • Use or issue of fraudulent documentation relating to qualifications and academic performance. 
  • Use or issue of fraudulent documentation NOT relating to qualifications or academic performance. 
  • Coercion or attempted coercion.
  • Blackmail or attempted blackmail. 
0 – 4

2

3

4

4

4

 

Misconduct against Property
Types of Misconduct Examples of Misconduct Level of Warning
Damage to property
  • Causing damage or defacement to ACM of associated property or the property of students, employees or visitors to ACM, caused by: 
  • Misuse/inappropriate use of property 
  • Negligence 
  • Reckless behaviour 
  • Intentional behaviour

0 – 1 

0 – 2 

2 – 3 

3 – 4

Unauthorised or Inappropriate Use of Property
  • Misuse of ACM premises or property, for example, using a studio for a social gathering.
  • Unauthorised use of/entry onto ACM premises or property, including computers and studio equipment. 
  • Unauthorised recording of a learning activity. 
  • Unauthorised publication of a recorded activity (e.g. on YouTube, Facebook etc.) including malicious or defamatory comment.
  • False activation of a fire alarm. 
  • Deliberate misuse of the ACM computer network, e.g. hacking, uploading of unauthorised or inappropriate data. 
  • Unauthorised use of intellectual property.
  • Infringement of copyright materials (e.g. selling or uploading materials to an essay mill).
0- 2 

0 – 2 

3 – 4 

2 – 4 

2 – 4 

Taking of property
  • Taking property belonging to another person without permission. 
  • Stealing personal property, excluding cash.
  • Stealing or non-return of ACM property
  • Stealing cash and goods.
  • Repeated act of stealing.
1 – 2 

1 – 4

Causing a Health or Safety concern
  • Act/omission that did cause or could have caused a health and safety concern on ACM premises, including external facilities used for ACM purposes (for example, smoking cigarettes in non-designated areas).
  • Act/omission that did cause or could have caused serious harm, injury or impairment of safety on ACM premises, including  external facilities used for ACM purposes, or during ACM activities (for example, disabling fire extinguishers, or covering up a smoke detector). 
  • Possession of an object which may cause harm, alarm and/or distress, including offensive weapons e.g. bladed articles, pepper spray, firearms, all replicas and any object intended or adapted for such purpose, such as the use of acid in a water pistol or a snooker ball. Note: possession is irrespective of intent to harm. 
1 – 4 

2 – 4 

2 – 4 

Illegal Substances
  • Consumption of and/or possession of illegal substances or associated paraphernalia on ACM premises, including  external facilities used for ACM purposes.
  • Dealing, including intent to supply, illegal substances on ACM premises, or outside of ACM premises whilst a registered student, including external facilities used for ACM purposes. 
0 – 2

4

 

Misconduct against People
Types of Misconduct Examples of Misconduct Level of Warning
Physical Misconduct
  • Pushing and/or shoving
  • Pulling hair
  • Inappropriate physical contact 
  • Punching
  • Kicking
  • Slapping
  • Biting

The above includes where actions have been motivated for self-defence reasons though this may be taken into account as a mitigating factor when considering sanctions.

0 – 2 

0 – 2

0 – 4

2 – 4 

2 – 4 

2 – 4 

2 – 4 

Abusive Behaviour
  • Use of inappropriate language (violent, aggressive, abusive, threatening, defamatory or offensive language), directly or indirectly or online. 
  • Sending inappropriate messages by email, text or on social media.
  • Acts of stalking, including following a person, watching or spying on them or forcing contact directly, indirectly or online.
  • Repeatedly contacting another person (by phone, email, text or on social networking sites) against the wishes of the other person. 
  • Any form of bullying or harassment* directly, indirectly or online, including acting in an intimidating and hostile manner. 
  • Any form of repeated harassment in person, writing, by email, via the internet (including social media) or otherwise.
  • Threats to hurt another person or retaliate, directly, indirectly or online.
  • Abusive comments relating to an individual’s sexual orientation, religion or age, directly or indirectly or online.
  • Intimidation: verbal or physical, directly, indirectly or online. 
0 – 4 

0 – 2 

1 – 4 

1 – 4 

2 – 4 

2 – 4 

2 – 4 

3 – 4

Sexual Misconduct
  • Making unwanted remarks of a sexual nature, directly, indirectly or online.
  • Inappropriately showing naked or semi-naked images to another person, for example, via social media.
  • Intimate contact without consent (e.g. touching, kissing, invading another person’s personal space). 
  • Indecent public exposure (e.g. flashing).
  • Sharing sexualised materials of another person (whether fully naked or not) without consent, directly, indirectly or online.
  • The taking or making of images of a person of a sexualised nature (e.g. photographs or AI-generated images). 
  • Sexual harassment, stalking or persecution (virtual or real) of someone with unwanted and obsessive attention.
  • Bullying or harassing behaviour (physical or non-physical) based on a person’s sexuality or gender, directly, indirectly or online.
  • Attempted sexual assault or rape.
  • Sexual assault.
  • Sexual intercourse or engaging in a sexual act without consent.
0 – 4 

1 – 4 

1 – 4 

3 – 4 

3 – 4 

2 – 4

2 – 4 

*harassment – unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect of either violating the claimant’s dignity, or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for them. 

Misconduct against the Community
Types of Misconduct Examples of Misconduct Level of Warning
Antisocial behaviour on campus
  • Smoking/E-smoking on ACM premises, other than in designated smoking areas.
  • Consumption of alcohol in a teaching/learning environment unless explicit permission has been granted (e.g. as part of a private viewing or event). 
  • Excessive printing or copying, or other unauthorised use of printing or copying facilities. 
1 – 2

1 – 2

1

Antisocial behaviour in any location
  • Environmental damage including littering, dumping of rubbish, inappropriate usage of bins, fly-tipping. 
  • Inconsiderate or inappropriate use of vehicles or travel conveyances, including e-scooters, bicycles and motorcycles, inconsiderate or inappropriate parking and vehicle noise. 
  • Misuse of fireworks. 
  • Repeated inconsiderate behaviour towards others, including the use of e-scooters, bicycles and motorcycles.
0 – 2 

0 – 2 

2 – 4

3.4 Penalties are determined depending upon the gravity of the case and/or the ongoing nature of the misconduct. The greater the severity of the misconduct, the greater the number of warning points and the greater the severity of the penalty. The range of penalties available include: a formal warning, restrictions/conditions, a written apology, suspension or deregistration. 

  1. Rationale and Scope of the Rules on Student Conduct and Discipline 

4.1 Action taken under these Rules shall supersede any action taken under any other rules relating to the conduct of those enrolled with ACM. 

4.2 Students accept, subject to their signed agreement as part of the enrolment process, that they will comply with the policies and procedures of ACM, and the academic regulations of ACM and, where applicable, its validating partners (e.g. in the case of FE). 

4.3 Students shall observe all lawful regulations or directions in relation to their attendance and their studies which may be made or given by staff of ACM acting by authority of the Executive. Breach of the provisions of the Policies, Codes, Rules and Regulations of ACM or failure to comply with a previously imposed warning under this Code or any other Policies, Codes, Rules and Regulations of ACM may result in disciplinary action. 

4.4 Students shall observe all lawful regulations or directions in relation to the effective organisation and management of ACM, which may be made or given by staff of, or contractors to, the institution, acting on the authority of the Executive (for example, regulations or directions in relation to health and safety, the use of facilities, the use of computers, refreshments, entertainment events and the payment of fees and charges). 

4.5 The conduct covered within these Rules shall constitute misconduct if it takes place on ACM property or premises or elsewhere if the student concerned was involved in an ACM activity, was representing ACM or was present at that place by virtue of their status as a student of ACM, including any work placement. 

4.6 It shall also constitute misconduct in any location whatsoever if the actions bring or have potential to bring ACM into disrepute, through reputational damage or other harm.  

4.7 The Student Conduct and Discipline rules extend to alleged misconduct by a student occurring on or off ACM premises (including via social media) where the alleged victim is ACM itself, a student or employee of ACM or others visiting, working or studying at the institution and to alleged misconduct occurring during institution activities (including placements and field trips). 

4.8 ACM is committed to putting in place measures to ensure students are dealt with fairly and impartially. Part of this commitment includes the ability to bring representation to meetings under this policy, and our commitment to enable students to continue with their studies wherever possible. 

4.9 This policy/procedure relates to all ACM provisions, including at our London, Guildford and Birmingham campuses. 

4.10 Definitions 

(a) ‘Suspension’ is a temporary precautionary measure that refers to forbidding attendance at, or access to, any parts of ACM and any participation in ACM activities. The suspension may be subject to qualification, such as permission to attend for the purpose of assessment. The exact details of the exclusion will be specified in writing. 

(b) ‘Exclusion’ involves selective restriction on attendance at, or access to ACM, or forbidding carrying out the functions or duties of any office or committee membership in ACM or the Student Voice Committee. The exact details of the exclusion will be specified in writing. 

(c) ‘Deregistration’ involves the permanent withdrawal of the student from all activities concerned with ACM. 

(d) ‘Risk Assessment’ is an assessment carried out in accordance with section 4.13 below, to evaluate what if any risks there might be in allowing a former student to be readmitted to ACM for any course offered by the institution. 

(e) ‘Reporting’ student, person or party refers to the person who reports the alleged breach of the Student Conduct and Discipline rules. 

(f) ‘Reported’ student, person or party refers to the person who is alleged to have breached the Student Conduct and Discipline rules.

4.11 Evidence 

Evidence is: 

(a) any statement(s) and other supporting information received from the reporting student(s) or reporting party; 

(b) any statement(s) and other supporting information received from the reported student(s); 

(c) any statement(s) and other supporting information received from other witnesses.

Normally, unless the reporting student objects, their evidence will be shared with the reported student. If the reporting student does not wish to have their evidence shared, ACM will respect that decision and the report will then be viewed as an anonymous report, which may affect the investigation and the outcome. 

ACM does not consider character references as evidence. 

If the matter has been referred to the police, the reporting student should provide their crime reference number or CAD number to ACM within 10 working days of reporting the incident. The reporting student should keep ACM updated on the police investigation. 

Failure to provide the requested information may result in ACM being unable to investigate the alleged misconduct. It is the responsibility of the reporting student to cooperate fully with ACM. 

4.12 Timeliness 

ACM will normally conclude the procedure pertaining to the alleged misconduct within 90 calendar days of the start of the investigation stage. 

4.13 Readmission Risk Assessment 

(a) The Academic Registrar (or nominee) will identify an appropriate panel of staff to carry out the Risk Assessment. 

(b) The panel’s evaluation will take into account all information that it considers is relevant to the Risk Assessment, including how serious the previous misconduct was. The panel may request a meeting with the former student, and/or other relevant individuals. The panel may decide the following outcomes when it has completed the Risk Assessment: 

  • Conclude that there is no risk to the applicant being readmitted; 
  • Reject the student’s application for admission based on the assessed risk(s) to admission, and the conclusion that the risks cannot be adequately managed if the student was readmitted. Such a decision is final; 
  • Conclude that there are risks, but that the student may be readmitted taking into account actions that ACM can take to manage the risk. 

5   The Disciplinary Procedure

Stage 1: Early Resolution and Reporting 

• Misconduct resolved at local level by a member of staff (by sanctioning a penalty of 0 warning points, i.e. a warning letter). 

• If resolution at local level is not possible or inappropriate, the misconduct is reported to the Student Conduct Investigatory team. 

 

Stage 2: Investigation 

• The Student Conduct Investigatory team gathers evidence (e.g. written statements, reports, emails). 

• The student may attend an investigatory meeting to answer questions and present their version of events. 

 

• The Academic Registrar (for HE) or the Principal of Further Education (for FE)  (or their nominee) considers the evidence and determines the following: 

o To take no further action; 

o To issue a Formal Written Warning, including sanctions; 

o To order the making good or restitution of damage or loss; 

o To suspend, pending further investigation, or to exclude; 

o To set up a disciplinary panel.

 

Stage 3: Disciplinary Panel 

• The student is advised in writing that a disciplinary panel will be formed to consider the alleged misconduct.

• The student is invited to a disciplinary hearing in front of a panel to answer questions about the alleged misconduct and give an account of their version of events. 

• The student has the right to be accompanied for the purposes of support (see paragraph 6.5). 

• Within 5 working days of the disciplinary hearing taking place, the disciplinary panel convenes to consider all evidence presented before it and to decide an outcome (more than one of the following may apply): 

o To take no further action; 

o To issue a written warning, including sanctions; 

o To order the making good or restitution of damage or loss; 

o To suspend or exclude the student; 

o Where 4 or more warning points have been reached or exceeded, a verdict decision of suspension or deregistration to be reached.

 

Stage 4: Appeal 

• The student has the right to appeal to the Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) via appeals@acm.ac.uk and within 10 working days if aggrieved by the verdict made by the disciplinary panel, the decision to suspend, exclude or deregister, or by an order to make good of damage or loss. 

• The Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) will consider the case. 

• The verdict of the Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) marks the completion of ACM’s internal procedures. At this point, the student will be issued with a Completion of Procedures letter, which allows recourse to the Office of Independent Adjudicator (OIA). 

Stage 1: Early Resolution and Reporting 

5.1 Where a student engages in any activity which may constitute misconduct under the ACM’s Student Conduct and Discipline rules, the following procedures shall apply. 

5.2 Where issues concerning student conduct and behaviour arise in the day to day running of the institution, where possible, these issues are to be resolved at a local level by a member of staff or a contractor normally within 21 working days of the date of the incident. 

5.3 With respect to student conduct and behaviour in a learning or teaching environment, appropriate managers are empowered, on an individual basis, to issue a written warning (0 warning points). Managers do not have the authority, on an individual basis, to impose sanctions greater than 0 warning points. All sanctions greater than 0 warning points shall only be imposed by a disciplinary panel. 

5.4 If it is not possible and/or appropriate to deal with an issue at a local level or the issue concerns misconduct which appears to be actually or potentially serious i.e. is deemed to warrant a sanction greater than 0 warning points (warning letter), the matter shall be reported to the attention of the Student Conduct Investigatory team. 

5.5 If a concern is reported to the Student Conduct Investigatory team, the student will normally be informed of this. 

5.6 Depending on the nature of the concern and the information available, a decision will be made by the Academic Registrar (or nominee) on whether or not to suspend or exclude the student pending further investigation. A risk-based approach may be used to inform this decision. 

5.7 ACM is committed, where possible, to ensuring students can remain engaged with their studies whilst disciplinary proceedings are ongoing. 

5.8 ACM will consider any reasonable adjustments for investigatory meetings and disciplinary hearings if they are provided by the student not less than 24 hours prior to the meeting. 

5.9 Suspension/De-registration is most likely to be used only if the seriousness of the case warrants it.

5.10 A student who is suspended or excluded during an investigation into their conduct will have the opportunity to request a suspension/exclusion review. The panel will not normally enter into discussion about the substantive nature of the allegation with the student as this will be reserved for the Investigation stage of the Disciplinary process. A request for a suspension/exclusion review should normally be made in writing and will normally take place within 5 working days from the date of the request.. In addition, the student may at any stage request a review of the suspension/exclusion decision by the Academic Registrar (for HE) or Principal of Further Education (for FE) (or their nominee) if there is a material change in circumstances. 

5.11 In a suspension/exclusion review, the panel will consider: 

  • any relevant reports, documents and records; 
  • the student’s response to the allegation; 
  • any relevant witness statements; and 
  • the seriousness (and frequency) of misconduct. 

It is the panel’s responsibility to determine the outcome of the suspension/exclusion review and to decide one or more of the following options: 

  • to lift suspension and take no further action; 
  • to lift the suspension and impose exclusion conditions; 
  • to keep the suspension/exclusion conditions in place, pending further investigation; 
  • to progress to a disciplinary hearing. 

A risk-based approach may be used to inform any of the above outcomes.

5.12 Should the student not attend a review when requested, the review panel shall continue in the student’s absence. The Academic Registrar (for HE) or Principal of Further Education (for FE) (or their nominee) will contact the student in writing thereafter regarding the panel’s decision. 

5.13 When a concern is reported, the Student Conduct Investigatory team will progress the disciplinary process to Stage 2 and commence investigatory proceedings.

6   Stage 2: Investigation and Investigatory meeting

6.1 The Student Conduct Investigatory team will commence the investigation stage, which constitutes gathering information and collating evidence relating to the allegation of misconduct. 

6.2 Evidence is likely to be, but not exclusively, in the form of a written statement from the reported party/parties; statements from other parties, for example, from a member of staff; reports from, for example, Security; other forms of evidence, such as CCTV footage, emails, text messages, messaging on social media, mobile phone screenshots. In addition, a student may be invited to attend an investigatory meeting where they will be asked questions relating to the alleged misconduct and provided the opportunity to present their version of events. 

6.3 In the absence of a written statement from the reporting party and/or where permission to share a statement with other parties has not been given, the investigation can proceed on the basis of the evidence that is available. At the investigatory meeting, the investigatory officers may pose questions based on the available evidence (i.e. a statement that has not been shared). The reporting party will be advised that, in them not consenting to sharing a statement, the investigation may be impaired to a degree. Depending upon the severity of the case, investigations would normally be completed within 21 working days. Parties will be updated if the timescale cannot be adhered to. 

6.4 If an investigatory meeting is required, the student will be requested in writing to attend. The purpose of the investigatory meeting is for the student to answer questions pertaining to the alleged misconduct. 

6.5 At an investigatory meeting, students are entitled to be accompanied by a friend, parent, mentor, or other representative. Students under the age of 18 or adults at risk must be accompanied by their parents, guardians or adults who have a position of responsibility for the student’s welfare. Any other representation is not normally allowed except with express permission from the lead investigator or Chair of the Disciplinary panel. Legal representation is not permitted. 

6.6 Helping a student to speak for themselves during the disciplinary procedure and ensuring that they are heard is known as ‘advocacy’. It is the responsibility of ACM to ensure that a student is provided with appropriate support where it is needed. Students are encouraged to make use of the support and guidance of Student Services.

6.7 On conclusion of the investigatory proceedings, the Academic Registrar (for HE) or the Principal of Further Education (for FE) (or their nominees) shall consider the gravity of misconduct and determine the following (more than one may apply): 

  • To take no further action; 
  • To issue a written warning including sanctions; 
  • To order the making good or restitution of damage or loss i.e. to impose a fine; 
  • To exclude or suspend the student; 
  • To set up a disciplinary panel. 

A risk-based approach may be used to inform any of the above outcomes. 

6.8 Further breaches of the Student Conduct & Discipline rules will be considered at a Disciplinary Panel.

7   Stage 3: Disciplinary Panel 

7.1 A disciplinary hearing is a meeting whereby a student will be required to discuss allegations against them in front of a panel and answer questions relating to the allegation of misconduct. 

7.2 The panel will be made up of stakeholders with the suitable expertise to fairly, impartially and carefully consider the case and will be comprised as follows: 

  • Chair (Academic Registrar or nominee)
  • Education representative 
  • Student Services representative (e.g. Safeguarding or Additional Needs and Disabilities team member)  

7.3 The disciplinary panel will consider the evidence before it, including any statements that have been made and any evidence that has been submitted by the reported student at the investigatory meeting or in writing. 

7.4 At the disciplinary panel, the panel will consider: 

  • the evidence presented before them; 
  • the student’s response to the allegation; 
  • any witness statements, including those provided to the panel in person; 
  • and, the gravity (and frequency) of misconduct. 

It is the panel’s responsibility to determine  the outcome of the disciplinary hearing and to decide one or more of the following options: 

  • to take no further action; 
  • to issue a written warning including sanctions; 
  • to order the making good or restitution of damage or loss 
  • to exclude or suspend the student; 
  • to revoke Alumni benefits; 
  • to deregister the student. 

A risk-based approach may be used to inform any of the above outcomes. 

7.5 The student will normally be informed of the panel’s decision within 5 working days of the disciplinary hearing. 

7.6 Should the student choose not to attend the panel they have the right to provide representation in the form of a written statement. 

7.7 Should the student choose not to attend, the disciplinary panel shall continue in the student’s absence. The Academic Registrar (or nominee) will contact the student in writing thereafter regarding the panel’s decision. 

7.8 Meetings are not normally recorded. Should a recording of the meeting be required, it may take place only with the consent of all attendees. 

8   Stage 4: Appeal 

8.1 The student shall have the right of appeal to the Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) by submitting their appeal in writing within 10 working days, giving the grounds for the appeal, if: 

  • The student is aggrieved by the decision reached at the investigatory stage (see section 6.5); 
  • The student is aggrieved by the panel’s decision from a disciplinary hearing (see section 7.7); 
  • The student is aggrieved by the decision to suspend or exclude (see section 5.11); 
  • The student considers that the procedures were not followed properly; 
  • The student has new material evidence that they were unable, for valid reasons, to provide earlier in the process; 
  • There is bias or reasonable perception of bias during the procedure. 

8.2 If the Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) considers for any reason that the panel’s decision needs to be referred back for further consideration (for example, student provides new material evidence or there is evidence of bias during the disciplinary procedures) the Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) may refer the matter back to the Academic Registrar or nominee to consider the evidence and to decide whether or not it would result in a change to the outcome. 

8.3 The Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) may seek clarifications to enable them to make a decision on whether to uphold or amend the decision. The purpose of the clarifications would not be to consider any new evidence; rather, it would be to help the reviewer at the appeal stage to understand any information that exists that is not clearly understood by the reviewer. 

8.4 Working day refers to a day on which ACM is normally open: it does not include Saturday, Sunday, Bank Holidays or other designated periods of closure outside the academic terms. 

8.5 The Executive Dean of Education (or nominee) shall consider the appeal and shall decide whether to uphold or amend the decision made. The decision of the Executive Dean of Education or nominee shall be final. 

8.6 Following an appeal to the Executive Dean of Education (or nominee), these procedures will now be complete. For FE students, the procedure will now be complete. For HE students, they may wish to consider approaching the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA). 

8.7 Where the student is an HE student, an appeal to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator should be made in writing to the address below within one year of the student receiving notification that the internal procedures of ACM have been completed. They should enclose a copy of ACM’s final decision and state the reasons for seeking redress from the Higher Education Independent Adjudicator. 

Email enquiries may be sent to enquiries@oiahe.org.uk. The website address is www.oiahe.org.uk

9   Warning Points System 

9.1 Where a student’s behaviour is being considered by the Academic Registrar (or their nominee), either at Stage 2: Investigation or Stage 3: Disciplinary hearing, then warning points may be used as a penalty (either alone or in combination with other penalties), if considered reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. Warnings, where considered appropriate, are recorded according to the seriousness and nature of the behaviour. There is no requirement that ACM apply warnings where a warning is considered inappropriate to the circumstances and an alternative penalty is applied. 

9.2 Offences, for the purpose of warnings, fall into different levels of seriousness classified on a four-point scale: minor — serious — grave — suspension/deregistration. 

9.3 A guide to the type of warning which might be issued is provided in paragraph 3.4 ‘Table of types of misconduct and consequences’. However, this is only a guide and it is expected that the Academic Registrar (or their nominee) will use their discretion and take into account the individual circumstances of each offence and vary the type of warning and/or penalty issued accordingly. 

9.4 Warnings recorded remain on the student record for the duration of the student’s enrolment at ACM. 

Accumulation of warnings 

9.5 Each level of warning is scored on a 0 to 4 basis as follows: 

Number of Warning Points: 

0  Written 

1  Minor 

2  Serious 

3  Grave 

4  Suspension and/or Deregistration  

9.6 Where the student has reached or exceeded 4 warning points on their student record, a decision about suspension, exclusion or deregistration must be made, and the student should normally be notified within two months after the most recent warning point is awarded. 

Relationship with other penalties / warnings 

9.7 ACM, independent of these Rules, separately has financial and other penalties which may be imposed such as library fines, use of facilities for which a charge is made, refusal to provide information required by law, reimbursement for loss or damage to ACM or personal property of staff, students or visitors, and whereby the use of facilities is regulated. Action taken by ACM under those arrangements does not automatically, but may, lead to reference to the Academic Registrar (or their nominee) for consideration of a warning or for other action under the Rules on Student Conduct and Discipline, with any such warning to be additional to any of the foregoing penalties, charges or reimbursement. 

9.8 ACM may record the existence of warnings on any reference supplied. 

9.9 If an applicant has had previous study terminated as a result of misconduct, ACM reserves the right to not consider their application to any programme of study.

10   Misconduct which is also a criminal offence 

10.1 There may be instances where an alleged act of misconduct may also constitute a criminal offence. 

10.2 The nature and scope of ACM’s internal disciplinary process and the nature and scope of a criminal process are fundamentally different. It is important to maintain a clear distinction between them: 

  • Under the criminal process, the allegations will be treated as a potential criminal offence; under the disciplinary process, the allegations will be treated as a potential breach of discipline. 
  • The criminal process is an external procedure. It deals with allegations that a student has committed a criminal act. The allegation has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. A judge can impose a wide range of sanctions on an individual who is found to have committed a criminal offence, the most serious sanction being imprisonment. 
  • The internal disciplinary process is a civil matter conducted internally at the institution. It is based upon an allegation that a student has breached the ACM’s rules and regulations. The allegation has to be proven on the balance of probabilities. The most serious sanction that can be applied is permanent expulsion from the institution (deregistration). 
  • Any adverse finding in the criminal process could result in the student having a criminal record and that subsequently could have a serious, detrimental effect on the future of the individual concerned at ACM.

10.3 The criminal process takes priority. If the matter is being dealt with under the criminal process, then save for taking any necessary precautionary action, the disciplinary process will be suspended until the criminal process is at an end. In that way, the disciplinary process does not duplicate the criminal process. 

10.4 If the matter is not being dealt with under the criminal process or where the criminal process has concluded, then ACM will consider whether a breach of discipline has occurred and, if so, will consider the matter through ACM’s Student Conduct and Discipline procedure.

11   Procedures for Misconduct which may constitute a criminal offence 

Reporting Incidents 

11.1 Anyone can make a report of criminal activity to the police. Where the victim of a criminal offence is the reporting student, ACM will usually take the position that the decision to report a criminal offence is a matter for the reporting student. It is not the responsibility of ACM to inform a student about a police investigation. 

Precautionary Measures 

11.2 Where an offence under criminal law is reported to ACM, action under this Policy will be deferred pending any police investigation or prosecution (the student will be required to provide ACM with a written update of any police investigation) save for taking any necessary precautionary measures: 

  • to ensure that a full and proper investigation can be carried out (either by police or by an ACM investigator); and/or 
  • to protect the reporting student or others while the allegation is being dealt with as part of a criminal process or a disciplinary process. 

Such precautionary measures would be considered by ACM at the point at which the reported student is made aware that a police investigation is being pursued. These measures would remain in place whilst the police investigation is ongoing. 

11.3 Precautionary measures may be put in place if they are reasonable and proportionate and may include: 

  • Imposing conditions on the accused student (for example, requiring the accused student not to contact the reporting student and/or certain witnesses) 
  • Suspending the accused student from his/her studies on a full, qualified or partial basis 
  • Excluding the accused student (for example, prohibiting the accused student from attending certain ACM events or activities, or exclusion from specified locations). 

11.4 ACM has the right to review a case if no information has been forthcoming from the student and/or the police regarding the progress of the case. ACM may come to a conclusion based on the evidence available. 

Criminal Investigation / Prosecution 

11.5 Where the offence under criminal law is reported to the police, action under this Policy will be deferred pending any police investigation or prosecution. Where ACM makes a finding of misconduct and the student has also been sentenced by a criminal court in respect of the same facts, the court’s penalty shall be taken into consideration in determining any warning points under this Policy. A risk-based approach may be used to assess whether a student may return to study.

Disciplinary Investigation / Charge 

11.6 If the reporting student will not report the matter to the police or will not cooperate in their enquiries, or the accused student is acquitted following a criminal process, ACM may consider the matter as a potential breach of student conduct and may consider sanctions. Only in exceptional circumstances will ACM report an alleged crime to the police contrary to the wishes of the reporting student. 

11.7 Depending on the nature of the concern, ACM may refer the misconduct which constitutes a criminal offence to the police. 

11.8 Sanctions for misconduct involving an illegal act include the following: 

  • Consumption of and/or possession of illegal substances on ACM premises or at an ACM event or activity (0-2 Warning Points) 
  • Dealing illegal substances on ACM premises or at an ACM event or activity (4 Warning Points)

Supporting Students 

11.9 ACM will make available appropriate assistance and relevant information and support to all students involved in disciplinary matters which may constitute a criminal offence, from the time when the incident is first reported to ACM up until the time when the relevant criminal and/or disciplinary process has been concluded and, in some cases, beyond that.

11.10 In cases involving allegations made by one student against another student, ACM will afford the same duties and obligations to both students so as to ensure both are treated fairly. Due regard will be taken, for example, to exercise a duty of care, apply the principles of natural justice, i.e. the right to a fair hearing before an impartial decision-maker, comply with equality law duties and uphold human rights and freedom of speech. 

11.11 It is ACM’s priority to ensure, where possible, that the disciplinary process does not impinge a student’s academic studies. This may mean, for example, the implementation of no-go areas on the ACM campus, in place of suspending a student. 

11.12 Advice and support is available to all students involved in disciplinary matters, in which they may reach out to the ACM’s Student Support services, such as the wellbeing or safeguarding teams. These teams are available at wellbeing@acm.ac.uk and safeguarding@acm.ac.uk 

  1. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND REVIEW
Version 1.5
Approved on 01 September 2025
Approved by Student Experience and Opportunity Board
Date of next review August 2026

 

Download this document: Student Conduct and Discipline

Policy 007: Academic Integrity & Misconduct

Policy 007: ACADEMIC INTEGRITY & MISCONDUCT

 

1 Introduction

 

1.1 The Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) is committed to operating in an ethical way in every area to ensure the highest possible standards of decision-making and accountability. 

 

1.2 ACM believes it is essential for students to develop a professional and ethically-informed skill-set based on the fundamental values of trust, honesty and integrity. This is because being able to work in a professional and ethical way is a highly valued graduate attribute. As part of this development it is fundamental that our students know how to learn from and acknowledge others’ work in the process of creating their own unique pieces of work – and to be truthful about their own contribution. 

 

1.3 ACM recognises that academic integrity is a set of learned skills, with honesty, fairness and respect for others and their work at the core. ACM will support and guide students to learn the necessary skills through education and reinforcement of learning, the promotion of core values, policies that enable, and the appropriate use of technology. 

 

1.4 In order to demonstrate academic integrity, students must produce their own work, acknowledging explicitly any material that has been included from other sources or legitimate collaboration. Students must also present their own findings, conclusions or data based on appropriate and ethical practice. 

 

1.5 It is a student’s responsibility to familiarise themself with the academic conventions and practices applicable to the course on which they are registered. It will be the responsibility of students to ensure that the work they submit for assessment is entirely their own, or, in the case of group work, the group’s own, and that they observe all Regulations, Procedures and instructions governing assessments. 

 

1.6 Students are expected to protect the integrity of their work and not allow others to see the text they have produced for their assignments except in official group work. They should exercise caution about sharing their ideas and draft copies with other students. They should not allow others access to electronic versions of their work and should always be able to demonstrate that the work is their own and correctly sourced and referenced. 

 

1.7 It is the responsibility of each individual student when submitting an assessment item to ensure that the work which they are submitting is the work which they wish to be assessed. 

 

1.8 Students must have ethical approval for their project/critical review/ dissertation, which cannot be gained retrospectively. Failure to do so may result in failure of the work. Refer to ACM’s Research Ethics Policy for details regarding requirements for ethical approval. 

 

1.9 Academic misconduct is a breach of the values of academic integrity and can occur when a student cheats in an assessment or attempts to deliberately mislead an assessor that the work presented is their own when it is not. It includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism, commissioning or buying work from a third party or copying the work of others, unauthorised and/or unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence in a piece of work submitted for grading. 

 

1.10 If a third party or anonymous whistleblower reports that there has been academic misconduct by a student of ACM, ACM may decide to investigate the allegations. 

 

1.11 ACM will take action against any student who breaches the regulations surrounding academic integrity through negligence, foolishness or deliberate intent in any form of assessment. 

 

1.12 This policy and procedure is concerned with the actions of students and not their intentions. An excuse of “not intending to” is not an acceptable defence. 

 

1.13 In all cases of alleged academic misconduct and cheating, students will be treated as innocent until a case against them has been investigated and upheld. 

 

1.14 A finding that academic misconduct has occurred is a judgement based on available evidence, the standard of proof being the balance of probability. 

 

1.15 These Procedures should be read in conjunction with the Student Terms and Conditions  – (Section 7) for Academic Integrity. 

 

2 Aims and Purpose 

 

2.1 This policy is designed to support staff and students to embed good practice and develop methods for enhancing Academic Integrity. Its aims are to:

 

  1. a) ensure fair and equal treatment of all students when considering whether academic integrity has been breached.

 

  1. b) make clear the types of behaviours that are considered to be academic misconduct. 

 

  1. c) set out the penalties for academic misconduct and cheating.

 

  1. d) describe the procedures by which allegations of academic misconduct and cheating will be investigated and determined.

 

  1. e) create a culture of enhancement, seeking to learn from cases of academic misconduct.

 

  1. f) uphold fairness, consistency and natural justice in the treatment of the student body as a whole. 

2.2 ACM provides unlimited storage in Google Drive to every student. Students are required to utilise this as a composition space in which to create, draft and store their work. The purpose of this is to enable students to demonstrate academic integrity and to show evidence of their learning.

2.3 When requested, students are required to share the version history of their work. The purpose of this is to verify the writing process (or equivalent) and the history of document creation, and to ensure that all students meet ACM’s academic integrity standards. Being able to show how your drafts led to the finished work is a positive way of working with the academic integrity process.

 

3 Principles 

 

3.1 The following principles underpin ACM’s approach to Academic Integrity: 

 

  1. a) ACM treats the decision as to whether minor errors, poor academic practice or unfair and/or dishonest academic misconduct has taken place as a matter for academic judgement and the penalties applied will vary according to the individual case and the seriousness of the offence. 

 

  1. b) This policy and procedure applies to all work submitted for the Foundation year and / or Undergraduate and Postgraduate degree programmes and will include all assessment items, including research proposals and theses. 

 

  1. c) Cases of plagiarism at all levels due to poor referencing, paraphrasing and unintentional mistakes in the form and frequency of citations in text, where deception does not appear to be the intention, will be considered as Poor Academic Practice and marked accordingly. 

 

  1. d) ACM recognises that undergraduate students who are new to Higher Education (for example, Foundation year students and students at FHEQ Level 4  level) may need some time to learn how to acknowledge sources correctly. ACM’s response to signs of academic misconduct at FHEQ Level 4 will be to educate students in regard to appropriate academic practice and academic integrity rather than to penalise unacceptable academic practice. This applies to plagiarism, self-plagiarism and collusion (except collusion in an online examination) only. It does not apply to other forms of academic misconduct, including inappropriate use of artificial intelligence, where penalties will immediately apply. 

 

  1. e) If academic misconduct is suspected in relation to work submitted by a student, in the interest of helping students to avoid continued acts, cases should be investigated as soon as possible and normally start within 21 working days of submission of the work. However, ACM will exercise its own judgement in cases that come to its attention and reserves the right to investigate cases where academic misconduct appears to have taken place more than one month previously. 

 

  1. f) Cases of suspected academic misconduct should be evidenced and documented before the appropriate procedure is instigated. Where appropriate a Viva should be conducted to demonstrate the student’s understanding of the subject matter. 

 

  1. g) Students will receive notification from the marker that their work is under investigation for Academic Misconduct in place of a provisional grade for the work submitted. A Holding Grade of U will be recorded in the student record. 

 

4 Allegations of Academic Misconduct (Third party Reporting)

 

4.1 Third parties include: (i) students of ACM (current or former students) reporting misconduct by another student, or (ii) members of the public, or (iii) anonymous reporters. 

 

4.2 If a third party reports that academic misconduct has been committed by a student of ACM, ACM may decide to investigate the allegations, taking into account the nature of the academic misconduct, any evidence provided by the reporting third party and any other supporting evidence obtained from sources independent of the reporting third party. 

 

4.3 ACM will not (unless the law permits) report any details about the investigation undertaken and the outcome of the investigation to the reporting third party, as such information will include the personal information of other individuals including of the student who is being investigated, and such information must remain confidential to comply with Data Protection law and other duties of confidentiality that ACM may have in relation to the student being investigated and other individuals. 

 

4.4 If a reporting third party insists on remaining anonymous, ACM may not be able to rely on the anonymous information as evidence of academic misconduct, as under the data protection legislation and other legal rights that protect individuals faced with allegations against them, the accused person will have a right to know what information others hold about them and how they obtained such information, as this is information relating to them and is therefore their personal data. 

 

4.5 If a reporting third party consents to their identity being disclosed to the student who has allegedly committed academic misconduct, ACM may consider any precautionary measures that need to be put in place to safeguard the reporting person or anyone else involved, in consultation with the individuals to be safeguarded.

 

4.6 If ACM cannot investigate an anonymous report, we may use the information to better understand the issues impacting our community, to understand trends, and to inform proactive preventive work. 

 

5 Definitions of Types of Academic Misconduct

 

5.1 Academic misconduct (cheating and unethical practices) in assessments is where a student gains, seeks, attempts or intends to gain advantage in relation to assessments or to aid another to gain such an advantage by unfair or improper means. The following list provides examples of misconduct, but is not exhaustive. 

 

  1. a) Minor Errors/Poor Academic Practice 

Minor errors arise when a student has attempted to adopt academically acceptable practices but has failed to do so accurately or fully, producing work that is unduly derivative or which fails to recognise sources. Examples include forgetting to insert quotation marks, minor mistakes in referencing or citation, gaps in the bibliography or reference list, non- compliance with some aspects of presentation guidelines. Work will be marked down for an over-reliance on external sources or for being overly derivative.

 

  1. b) Cheating in examinations or tests 

Breaching the Examination Room Rules for Candidates (Section K). This includes assessments that are taken ‘in-class’, ‘online’ or any other form of summative examination. 

 

  1. c) Collusion 

Collusion occurs when, unless with official approval (e.g. in the case of group projects), two or more students consciously collaborate in the preparation and production of work which is ultimately submitted by each in an identical or substantially similar form and/or is represented by each to be the product of individual efforts. Examinations and Online timed assessments that contain similar work will be treated as collusion. Collusion also occurs where there is unauthorised co-operation between a student and another person in the preparation and production of work which is presented as the student’s own. This includes when one student produces work and allows another student to copy it – both students will be culpable. If both students submit the work in the same submission period, even at different times, both students will be deemed to have colluded.

 

Collusion can also be the act of one student presenting a piece of work as their own independent work when the work was undertaken by a group. With group work, where individual members submit parts of the total assignment, each member of a group must take responsibility for checking the legitimacy of the work submitted in their name. If even part of the work is found to contain academic misconduct, penalties will normally be imposed on all group members equally. 

 

Peer review of each other’s work or discussing an assignment can be helpful. However, students should be wary of falling into an act of collusion by actually producing/writing parts of an assignment for their peer/friend or giving them access to the work.

 

  1. d) Copying 

Copying occurs when a student consciously presents as their own work material copied directly from a fellow student or other person without their knowledge. It includes the passing off of another’s intellectual property, not in the public domain, as one’s own. It differs from collusion in that the originator of the copied work is not aware of, or party to, the copying. Copying of work from published sources would be dealt with as plagiarism.

 

  1. e) Dishonest Use of Data: Fabricating or falsifying data or using without permission another person’s work 

Fabricating or falsifying data to include presenting work that has not taken place. This includes laboratory reports or projects based on experimental or field work. It may also include falsifying attendance sheets for placements where this is part of the assessment requirements.

 

  1. f) Requirement for Ethical Approval 

Failure to gain ethical approval through ACM’s ethical approval processes prior to beginning research, or where the student makes a major deviation from any approved research without gaining additional ethical approval, may result in failure of the work. Refer to ACM’s Research Ethics Policy for details regarding requirements for ethical approval.

 

  1. g) False declarations 

False declarations and evidence presented in order to receive special consideration by Assessment Boards, including extensions, deferrals and requests for exemption from work. False declarations may be handled under ACM’s Student Conduct and Disciplinary procedure. It will be made clear to students where this is the case. 

 

  1. h) Plagiarism – Passing off someone else’s work, whether intentionally or unintentionally, as your own 

Plagiarism occurs when a student misrepresents, as their own work, work in the public domain, written or otherwise, of any other person (including another student) or of any institution. Examples of forms of plagiarism include:

 

  1. i) the verbatim (word for word) copying of another’s work without appropriate and correctly presented acknowledgement and citation of the source. 

 

  1. ii) the close paraphrasing of another’s work by simply changing a few words or altering the order of presentation, without appropriate and correctly presented acknowledgement and citation of the source.

 

  • Sham Paraphrasing: When someone copies text, word for word from a source, references the work but does not place it in quotation marks so it appears to be paraphrased.  
  • Illicit paraphrasing: When someone paraphrases text from a source but does not acknowledge the source.

 

iii) failure to reference appropriately or to adequately identify the source of material used:

 

  • Concealing sources: If a student cites a piece of work from a source more than once they must reference it each time. No matter how many times they refer back to the source they must acknowledge the source, even if it is in the very next paragraph.
  • Fake Referencing: To make up quotations and/or supply false/inaccurate quotations and/or citations, including references/sources, or any part thereof. The fake citation can be either completely fabricated or reference a real source (book, journal, or website) which contains no such article or words that have supposedly been used or to imply that books and/or journals have been used by copying citations from the work of other authors when they have not.  
  • Secondary referencing: To mention someone’s work which has been referred to in a document a student has read, even though the student hasn’t read the original piece of work themselves. When a student compiles their reference list students must only include the document(s) read by the student.

 

  1. iv) the deliberate and detailed presentation of another’s concept as one’s own.

 

  1. i) Self-plagiarism 

Self-plagiarism, also called auto-plagiarism, is when a student submits the same piece of work, or substantial part thereof, for assessment more than once for graded credit without acknowledging what they are doing by citing the original content. It will be regarded as Self-plagiarism unless the original piece of work is appropriately referenced in the new submission. 

 

  1. j) Purchasing or Commissioning 

Purchasing or commissioning is either attempting to purchase or purchasing work for an assessment including, for example, from the internet, or attempting to commission, or commissioning someone else to complete an assessment. Essay mills are now illegal entities, and use of them is facilitating an illegal activity. 

 

For assessments at all levels, the commissioning of proof-reading where this substantially alters the content of the original work, whether this is from a commercial provider or a personal contact, falls under this definition and is considered academic misconduct. 

 

  1. k) Deliberate attempt to gain advantage by unfair or improper means

Trying to deceive specialist text checking software (e.g. Turnitin) by, for example, using text replacement tools, images in documents instead of text, submitting documents in an alternative format than that stipulated by the assessor/assessment brief.

 

  1. l) Unethical Use of Artificial Intelligence 

Unethical use of artificial intelligence in a piece of work submitted for grading. Content generated by artificial intelligence which is not cited or referenced, giving the impression that the content is the student’s own original work. 

 

6 Appropriate Academic Conduct 

 

6.1 Academic Staff are responsible for informing students: 

 

  1. a) Students are only permitted to submit their own original work for assessments. 

 

  1. b) Students should not allow others to see the text they have produced for their assignments and should exercise caution about sharing their ideas and draft copies with other students.

 

  1. c) Students should not allow others access to electronic versions of their work. 

 

  1. d) Students should take care to ensure the originality of their own assessment submissions and should always be able to demonstrate that work is their own and correctly sourced and referenced, including declarations of where and how AI was used, where necessary. 

 

Procedures 

 

7 Initial Procedures 

 

7.1 Whilst an investigation is being carried out, the Assessment Board may note the incident and defer judgement. 

 

7.2 A holding grade of U (allegation of academic misconduct under investigation) should be entered by the Assessment Operations Manager or nominee on the student’s module record (for cross-reference with other alleged infringements). 

 

8 Procedure for investigation by the Academic Misconduct Team

 

8.1 Where a tutor suspects academic misconduct to have occurred, the tutor flags the submitted work to the Academic Misconduct Team for review. 

 

8.2 An Academic Misconduct Team member determines whether there are reasonable grounds to pursue an allegation of academic misconduct or whether the work referred to them should be treated as a case of Poor Academic Practice (Category A). 

 

8.3 Where there are no reasonable grounds to pursue an allegation of academic misconduct, the work should be returned to the tutor and marked on its academic merits. All record of the alleged misconduct will be removed from the student’s record. 

 

8.4 Where the work should be treated as a case of Poor Academic Practice (Category A), the work should be returned to the tutor and marked on its academic merits, taking into account the nature of the poor academic practice, such as (for example) an over-reliance on external sources. The student should be given feedback on where they can seek help (e.g. Digital Librarian) or where to access resources with regard to referencing, etc. 

 

8.5 If the Academic Misconduct Team determines there are reasonable grounds to suggest the candidate has contravened the regulations in assessment, they or a nominated tutor shall write to the student(s) concerned: 

 

(a) To put the allegation to the student. 

(b) If appropriate, to enclose copies of any evidence or report. 

(c) Request a written statement to explain how the allegation may have arisen, stating any mitigating circumstances which may be taken into account when considering a penalty (authenticated evidence to be provided where appropriate). 

(d) To notify the student that they may request a meeting in preference to submitting a written statement, if they prefer.

(d) To request a reply within 10 days of the date on which the letter or email is sent and explaining the consequences of failure to reply. 

 

Student Response

 

8.6 If a written reply to the allegation or a request for a meeting is not received from the student within 10 days of the date on which the letter or email is sent, or if the student replies accepting the allegation, the Academic Misconduct Team shall escalate the allegation to the Academic Misconduct Panel for consideration under the terms of this Academic Integrity Policy. 

 

9 Retrospective allegations of Academic Misconduct 

 

9.1 Exceptionally, where academic misconduct is discovered after a grade has been published or an award has been conferred, an allegation may be pursued retrospectively under these procedures. Where a student has already graduated, the outcome may result in the revoking of a qualification already awarded. 

 

10 Guidelines for Penalties for Academic Misconduct 

 

  1. a) The minimum penalty imposed shall normally exceed that which would follow if the student had merely failed the assessment. 

 

  1. b) The penalties listed must be taken as indicative of the maximum penalties which may be imposed (see Table A). 

 

  1. c) All confirmed offences for taught programmes must be recorded on the student’s record as grade P for the module. This grade to remain throughout the student’s registration at ACM and to be replaced on formal documents by grade 0%.

 

  1. d) All confirmed offences for research programmes will be recorded on the student record and remain throughout the student’s registration at ACM.  

 

  1. e) All records of disproved offences must be deleted from the student record. 

 

  1. f) A student may appeal against the decision of the Assessment Board to impose a penalty by following the Academic Appeals policy and procedure. 

 

  1. g) If a student submits multiple assessments within a similar timeframe (and will not have had the opportunity to have had feedback) and has committed the same type of offence, the appropriate penalty will be applied to all the assessments as a simultaneous offence.

 

11 Categories, Actions and Penalties

 

Table A

 

Penalty Examples Key Indicators  Actions
Category A


MINOR MISCONDUCT

  • Reproducing an existing concept or idea unintentionally
  • Failure to adequately reference sources at Level 4, including incomplete or incorrectly cited bibliographies, footnotes and/or quotations 
  • Several sentences of direct copying without acknowledging the source
  • Several instances of inappropriate or unacknowledged paraphrasing
  • Unacknowledged proofreading by another person 
  • Unacknowledged help with English language accuracy
  • The student has not yet learnt about the importance of referencing or has misunderstood the referencing or paraphrasing principles
  • The student’s behaviour appears unintentional
  • The student’s behaviour may be intentional but on an insignificant scale
  • The student is in their 1st year of university education 
  • The student is not used to UK academic culture 
  • Tutorial support and guidance to help the student understand what is and is not acceptable and
  • Written advice to the student on where they can seek help (such as the Digital Librarian)
  • Warning regarding penalties for academic misconduct offences 
Category B

MODERATE
MISCONDUCT

  • Several paragraphs of direct copying without acknowledging the source (including one’s own previously submitted work on another assignment)
  • At any FHEQ level, references, research and/or in-text citations are found not to exist 
  • Failure to adequately reference sources at Level 5 and above, including incomplete or incorrectly cited bibliographies, footnotes and/or quotations 
  • Several paragraphs of unacknowledged paraphrasing of another person’s thoughts, ideas or text
  • An assignment that has been translated into English by another person
  • An assignment that has been edited by another person
  • Deliberately submitting the same piece of work for assessment for more than one assignment
  • Collusion
  • Repeated Minor Misconduct, particularly where the student has been previously reprimanded 
  • The student’s behaviour appears intentional but on a small scale
  • The student’s behaviour will not have a significant impact on their final award
  • Normally a mark of P at the module level with the opportunity to resubmit the affected component (where further attempts have not been exhausted). The resubmitted component will be capped at 40% on a passing grade
  • Where a student has already been given an opportunity to resubmit a failed component and all attempts at the module are exhausted, the Assessment Board will normally, subject to Programme Regulations, award P for the whole module with the opportunity to re-enrol in the module or an appropriate alternative with full fees applicable and subject to a cap of 40% on a passing grade
  • Warning that further breaches of academic integrity will have serious consequences for the student’s final qualification
Category C

SERIOUS

MISCONDUCT

  • Large sections of unacknowledged paraphrasing of another person’s ideas or text
  • Presentation of the work of other students without acknowledgement
  • Presentation of the work of commercial or industry practitioners without acknowledgement
  • At any FHEQ level, references, research and/or in-text citations are found not to exist 
  • Deliberate failure to  adequately reference sources at Level 5 or above, including incomplete or incorrectly cited bibliographies, footnotes and/or quotations 
  • Deliberate falsifying of data, or using another person’s work without permission
  • Breach of Examination Room rules
  • Conspiring or colluding with others to commit any of the above
  • Repeated Moderate and/or Serious Misconduct, particularly if the student has been previously reprimanded 
  • False declarations in order to receive special consideration by Assessment Boards, including deferrals and requests for exemption from work 
  • The student’s behaviour appears intentional and on a significant scale
  • The student has intended to deceive the person marking the work and/or undermine the integrity of the assessment 
  • The student would benefit significantly from the offence
  • The student’s behaviour would significantly affect the integrity of the university’s awards
  • The student may have been warned/reprimanded for previous attempts to deceive
  • Normally a mark of P at the module level with the opportunity to resubmit the affected component (where further attempts have not been exhausted). The resubmitted component will be capped at 40% on a passing grade
  • Where a student has already been given an opportunity to resubmit a failed component and all attempts are exhausted, the Assessment Board will normally, subject to Programme Regulations, award P for the whole module with the opportunity to re-enrol in the module or an appropriate alternative with full fees applicable and subject to a cap of 40% on a passing grade

Or, in cases of the most serious misconduct

  • All modules at that level/stage will be marked with a P with an opportunity to re-enrol in that level/stage. All re-enrolled modules will be capped at 40% on a passing grade and full fees will be applicable
  • Exceptionally, the Assessment Board may, at its discretion and with reasonable cause, decide that a student may not be reassessed 
Category D

GROSS 

MISCONDUCT

  • Submitting an assignment purchased or downloaded from the internet (e.g. the use of the services of an essay mill) 
  • Commissioning another person to produce a piece of work
  • Theft of the work of another/other student(s)
  • Theft of the work of commercial or industry practitioners
  • Copyright/Intellectual Property Theft
  • Fraud or deception, including impersonation and misrepresentation of identity
  • Acts of violence or vandalism
  • Breach of Examination Room Rules
  • Repeated Serious Misconduct, particularly if the student has been previously reprimanded 
  • Any offence in which the student commits physical violence, malicious abuse, theft, fraud or other fundamental breach of trust, including substantial plagiarism in a postgraduate dissertation, purchasing or commissioning of work, will be regarded as gross misconduct and may therefore lead to deregistration from the programme. See also the Student Conduct and Discipline Policy 
  • A mark of P at the module level with a re-enrolment in the module, capped at 40% on a passing grade and with full fees applicable OR
  • A lower level award OR
  • Deregistration from the programme 
  • Revoking a previously awarded qualification 

 

Note: All cases will sit on a sliding scale of severity. There may be situations where what would normally be considered a minor offence will more appropriately be considered as serious misconduct, due, for example, to the extent of the deliberation and intention to deceive. These examples should therefore be used as a guide to help the relevant stakeholders identify procedures, keeping in mind that an element of academic judgement will always be required in determining the level of academic misconduct and the appropriate action to take. 

 

12 Fee and delivery implications

 

12.1 Requirement to re-enrol in a module or a substitute module may incur additional fees and possible disruption to the student’s original delivery schedule. Interruption to, or deregistration from, enrolment to the programme of study may also incur issues with regard to student loan access and/or funding. Students should refer to the Finance Policy for details regarding fee liability, available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

 

13 Appeals

13.1 If a student wishes to appeal a decision made by ACM regarding academic integrity, they should follow ACM’s Academic Appeals policy and procedure, available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

 

14 Policy Document Responsible Parties

 

14.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of this policy in liaison with the Policy Review Committee. The Academic Integrity & Misconduct policy lead is: 

 

  • Head of Assessments 

 

14.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the following designated staff: 

 

  • Head of Quality and Standards 
  • Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager 
  • Executive Dean of Education
  • Dean of Academic Practice and Enhancement
  • Head of Assessments

 

15 References 

 

15.1 Internal references: 

 

  • Academic Appeals Policy and Procedure
  • Research Ethics Policy
  • Finance Policy 
  • Student Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy 

 

15.2 External references: 

 

  • Office for Students (OfS): Regulatory Framework for Higher Education in England 
  • OfS Conditions B1 to B6 
  • Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) Good Practice Frameworks

 

16 Date of Approval and Next Review 

 

Version: 1.8
Approved on: 01 September 2025
Approved by: Student Experience and Opportunity Board
Next Review: August 2026

Download this policy: POL007_Academic Integrity & Misconduct_2025-26

Policy 008: Equality and Diversity

Policy 008: Equality and Diversity

1. Purpose and Scope

1.1. This policy describes the way in which ACM approaches matters relating to student and staff equality and diversity.

1.2. This policy outlines the steps taken to ensure due consideration is taken to the embedding of a culture at ACM which is sensitive, inclusive and mindful of its stakeholders differing needs and expectations in relation to equality and diversity.

2. Policy Statement

Equality and Diversity

2.1. The Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) aims to ensure that no one is treated less favourably than another on the grounds of gender, race, nationality, ethnic or national origin, religious or political beliefs, disability, marital status, social background, family circumstance, sexual orientation, gender reassignment, spent criminal convictions, age or for any other unlawful reason.

2.2 ACM recognises and encourages the valuable and enriching contribution of all who work within ACM and the rights of all individuals who come into contact with ACM, such as prospective students and other stakeholders.

2.3 This policy provides ACM’s overarching vision, values and commitments in relation to equality and diversity. It has been written to reflect changes in equality legislation including the Equality Act 2010.

2.4 At ACM we are committed to advancing equality of opportunity, respecting and celebrating differences, eliminating discrimination, harassment and victimisation and fostering good relations between all who work or learn at ACM, or use our services. We recognise that all have a right to equality of opportunity regardless of the nine characteristics covered by the Act:

  • Race
  • Disability
  • Gender
  • Age
  • Sexual Orientation
  • Religion and belief
  • Gender Reassignment
  • Pregnancy/maternity
  • Marriage/civil partnership

2.5 Other aspects of a person’s identity, background or circumstances can cause them to experience discrimination, for example a person’s socio economic status, class or background. ACM is committed to advancing equality and eliminating discrimination on these and other grounds. 

The Student Experience

2.6 ACM  is committed to:

  • Ensuring and promoting equality through teaching and learning, and also in the selection, enrolment, assessment and progression of students.
  • Providing appropriate student support and guidance which reflects the diversity of students’ needs both pre-entry and on-course. This means that no student will receive less favourable treatment on the basis of their protected characteristics.
  • Support and guidance for students will be linked to their particular needs. It also means that ACM aims to promote equal respect for all people, to challenge prejudice and to prepare students to work in a multicultural and diverse society.
  • Ensuring equality of opportunity for all under-represented groups of students through an up to date and regularly reviewed Access and Participation Plan (APP) 

Principles

2.7 This Policy is underpinned by principles to which all ACM students and stakeholders should adhere, namely:

  • To create an environment in which individual differences and the contributions of all our staff and students are recognised and valued.
  • That successful implementation of the Policy is the responsibility of all ACM students and stakeholders.
  • That all students and other stakeholders of ACM will be treated with fairness, respect and sensitivity.
  • To aim to create and maintain a working and learning environment where all stakeholders will have the opportunity to fully participate in order to achieve their full potential in a climate free from discrimination, bullying or harassment.

2.8 Breaches of this Policy will be regarded as misconduct and could lead to disciplinary proceedings.

2.9 The Equality Act recognises the following types of discrimination:

  • Direct discrimination, including associative and perception of discrimination.
  • Indirect discrimination
  • Harassment
  • Victimisation
  • Discrimination arising from disability
  • Failure to make reasonable adjustments

2.10 This policy applies to all students and visitors to ACM. Where students are working at premises other than ACM locations, they will be subject to the policy.

2.11 This policy covers all behaviour by the individual including online platforms such as the Virtual Learning Environment, email, communications channels, distribution media and platforms and across any social media.

Implementation

2.12 The Equality Act 2010 introduced a Public Sector Equality Duty, in force from April 2010, which requires ACM to give due regard to:

  • Eliminating discrimination, harassment or victimisation.
  • Advancing equality of opportunity.
  • Fostering good relations.

2.13 Implementation of this policy is managed via ACM, School and Department plans which will take account of ACM’s commitment to Equality and Diversity and seek to implement its provisions.

2.14 ACM will ensure that its strategic plan has a commitment to equality and diversity; that they receive and review reports on student equality, diversity and widening participation, that they agree relevant equality targets and impact measures and monitor progress towards these.

2.15 The Senior Management Team will take an active and visible lead in driving forward equality and diversity; provide reports; oversee implementation of this policy; ensure equality and diversity data is embedded within self-assessment reports and development plans and agree quality targets with managers.

Monitoring

2.16 The effectiveness of this policy in ensuring we are meeting our obligations will be monitored through regular collection and analysis of data that should be as unobtrusive to individuals as possible, commensurate with this objective.

2.17 ACM monitoring of the implementation and effectiveness of the Policy will be the responsibility of the Senior Management Team. Departments will be responsible for the gathering and analysis of data as required in line with cyclical reporting. Outcomes from analysis of information collated will inform self assessment processes and ACM improvement plans.

Addressing Discrimination, Harassment and Victimisation

2.18  ACM will:

  • Actively challenge and tackle all forms of prejudice, discrimination and stereotypical attitudes.
  • Deal with allegations of discrimination, harassment and victimization sensitively, and investigate promptly, fairly and thoroughly.
  • Treat any form of discrimination, harassment or victimisation carried out by an individual as a matter for possible disciplinary action. This includes harassment by a third party.

Publicity

2.19 The Image ACM projects of itself in its promotional material, advertising and public relations activity, sends messages about the people ACM expects and wishes to serve. ACM’s publicity will be regularly reviewed to ensure that:

  • It is non-discriminatory to any group or individual
  • It is provided in hard copy and electronic forms to ensure that information is widely available and accessible by individuals with a range of needs.
  • It gives the positive image of a place which welcomes everyone for education and training.
  • Applications from members of disadvantaged or underrepresented groups are actively encouraged into areas where such groups might be underrepresented.

2.20  Every effort will be made to ensure that appropriate publicity reaches all groups in the community, enabling the widest possible recruitment.

2.21  All ACM students, and potential students, should be made aware of:

  • The available study support.
  • The services available within ACM to support students with additional learning needs.
  • ACM counselling and guidance services.
  • The availability of careers guidance and industry related opportunities and enrichment activities.

Student Recruitment

2.22 The process of gaining admission to ACM programmes will be clearly expressed and structured to allow, wherever possible, ease of access to all students throughout the year where appropriate. Prospective students will be offered support and guidance at all stages.

2.23 During the admissions process, students will be invited to indicate details relating to their ethnic origin, any additional learning needs and any special educational needs. This information will be used only for the purposes of providing support, for monitoring and as a reference when considering necessary modifications to the curriculum, marketing activities, buildings and equipment.

2.24 No ACM employee will discriminate unfairly, directly or indirectly in the guidance and recruitment of students.

2.25 Students with additional learning needs and special educational needs will be given the opportunity to discuss ways of overcoming any problems of access (in it’s widest sense, including access to the curriculum) and should be actively involved in problem solving.

Access to the Curriculum

2.26 ACM is an open access institution that seeks to offer learning opportunities to all, whatever their previous level of achievement.

2.27 Programme Handbooks, syllabi and resources will be regularly examined to ensure they do not discriminate, directly or indirectly, against any student group. They should be enhanced by including positive acknowledgement of the contributions made to society by a diversity of cultures.

2.28 Programmes should be accessible to as wide a range of students as possible, by enhanced flexibility in both delivery and timing.

2.29 Learning Support will be made available to all students requiring it, subject to resources.

2.30 Ways of modifying curriculum delivery to allow access to classes to individuals with additional learning needs or special educational needs should continue to be sought.

2.31 Assistive technologies will be developed and deployed to assist and enhance the participation of students with disabilities and impairments in their use of learning opportunities.

2.32 Learning opportunities will be provided for targeted groups to facilitate access and opportunity.

2.33 Procedures for accreditation and assessment will, wherever practicable, be flexible and responsive to the needs of the whole range of students who attend ACM.

2.34 ACM supports the entitlement, for the whole ACM community, to information, guidance and counselling, which will enable individuals to manage their personal development.

Equality and Diversity related concerns

2.35 Any student, customer or client who feels she/he is being discriminated against for reason of disability, gender, ethnic origin, age, socio-economic group or sexual orientation should raise the matter formally or informally, as appropriate, with one of the following, in the first instance:

  • Their Pathway Leader
  • Dean of Education
  • Head Education Delivery and Development
  • Head of Student Services
  • Academic Registrar
  • Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager

2.36 The Student Complaints and Grievance Procedure is available for cases of alleged discrimination against students.

2.37  All complaints will be taken seriously by the person receiving them and the appropriate process will be followed to respond to the complaint. Complaints provisions are subject to regular review under the Quality Assurance and Enhancement policy and procedures.

ACM Environment

2.38  By adapting and modifying the environment and facilities, where appropriate, ACM will strive to make students, staff, customers and visitors feel welcome.

2.39 Offensive material of a discriminatory nature will not be displayed in any part of ACM.

2.40 ACM communications and publication (internal and external) will not use language or images which are potentially discriminatory against any group or individual.

2.41 A facility will be made available, if required, to meet diverse religious needs.

2.42 ACM catering facilities will reflect the needs of and show sensitivity to different dietary needs.

2.43 ACM will comply with the requirements of all current legislation relating to the access rights of people with disabilities.

2.44 Consideration will continue to be given to the provision of off-site tuition, where appropriate, to the needs of disadvantaged groups.

3. Responsible Parties

3.1 The policy lead is responsible for the cyclical monitoring and review of the policy in liaison with the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager. The Equality and Diversity Policy lead is:

  • Head of Student Services

3.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the following designated staff:

  • Head of Student Services
  • Head of Diversity, Access and Participation
  • Senior Management Team
  • Education Management Team
  • Pathway Leaders
  • Staff with line management responsibilities

4. Reference Points

4.1 Internal:

  • Safeguarding Policy
  • Student Complaints and Grievances Policy
  • Student Conduct and Discipline Policy
  • Staff Disciplinary Policy
  • Data Protection Policy

4.2 External:

  • The Equality Act 2010

5. Date of Approval and Next Review

Version:                        1.2

Approved on:               01 September 2025

Approved by:               Academic Board

Next Review:                August  2026

Download POL_008_Equality And Diversity

Policy 009: Additional Needs and Disability

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: and@acm.ac.uk

Policy 009: Additional Needs and Disability

  1. PURPOSE

1.1 This Policy aims to ensure that ACM promotes and embodies the delivery of inclusive education across all it’s campuses, including Higher Education, Further Education and for all ACM students.

1.2 This Policy describes how the ACM meets the needs of students with additional needs and disabilities by:

  • Providing targeted and specialist support to those meeting evidential criteria to access funding for Further and Higher Education support.
  • Providing advice to students with an additional need during enrolment, on course and through progression.
  • Working collaboratively and proactively with parents/guardians/stakeholders by adopting a multi-disciplinary partnership approach.
  • Influencing organisational decisions ensuring adequate levels of inclusive practice and accessibility are considered.
  • Advocating for students who have a protected characteristic as recognised by the Equality Act.
  1. POLICY DETAILS

2.1 ACM is committed to the provision of equal opportunities for students with additional needs and disabilities, and aims to create an environment that enables them to participate fully in Further and/or Higher Education. It recognises its duties to make reasonable adjustments as described in Section 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010.

 

2.2 ACM recognises and embodies a social model of disability. That everyone who has the capability to benefit from studying at ACM should have the opportunity to do so: this is the principle that informs ACM’s approach to widening participation in a range of areas, including disability.

 

2.3 ACM takes positive steps to ensure that disabled students can fully participate in the education and other benefits, facilities and services provided for students. This duty is anticipatory and continuing.

 

2.4 To encourage an inclusive approach to disabled students, ACM need to respond appropriately ensuring that:

  • staff have appropriate training to review their own practices and adopt more inclusive learning, teaching and assessment approaches;
  • staff understand their duties to make reasonable adjustments;
  • staff are aware of the advice and support services for disabled students within ACM.

2.5 ACM does not deny admission to prospective students on the grounds of their disability and takes such steps as it is reasonable, within its means and capabilities, to avoid any disadvantage. In the event that ACM is not able to meet the needs of a particular student, alternatives will be discussed. Admission to the programme would be institutionally irresponsible if ACM is not able to make the necessary adjustments to ensure the well-being, safety and quality of experience for prospective students.

2.6 For all matters relating to this policy and inclusive practice please refer to the Additional Needs and Disability Department. They can be contacted via email on and@acm.ac.uk  or by telephone on 01483 501211.

  1. POLICY SCOPE

4.1 This policy applies to ACM students studying both Further Education and Higher Education. It is embodied in all three campuses and across the organisation as a whole.

4.2 It also recognises its responsibility to applicants, staff, visitors and contractors that may also have an additional need or disability.

  1. RELATED POLICIES

This policy is embedded across all organisational practices. All associated documents can be found on the ACM website under policies or by using the link. https://www.acm.ac.uk/policies/

Associated policies include:

  • 008 Equality and Diversity010 Safeguarding
  • 011 Fitness to Study
  • 012 Learning, Teaching, Assessment and Attainment
  • 013 Hardship and Travel Bursary Funding
  • 015 Admissions Policy
  • 020 Data Access and Protection
  • 046 Risk Assessment
  • 058 Student Withdrawal, Interruption and Internal Transfer
  • 067 Looked After Young People and Care Leavers

It also directly relates to ACM’s Access and Participation Strategy. This can be found on the ACM website via the link:

https://www.acm.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ACMGuildfordLtd_APP_2020-21_10067853.pdf

  1. POLICY OWNER

6.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Student Engagement and Quality Committee. The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework. The Student Engagement and Quality Committee delegates operational responsibility to the Additional Needs and Disability department. They can be contacted via email on and@acm.ac.uk  or by telephone on 01483 501 211.

  1. DEFINITIONS

7.1 Throughout this policy the term ‘Additional Needs and Disability’ is used to denote students with an identifiable additional need that may not be met by the core offer. It is interchangeable with the term ‘Special Educational Needs (SEN)’ and includes those with a learning disability, specific learning difficulty, mental health condition, health problem, physical/hidden impairment or a social care need.

  1. PROCEDURES

Admissions Arrangements

8.1 All applicants wishing to study at ACM complete an admission form that includes details of any additional need or disability. We encourage applicants to share information on any condition that may inhibit their ability to access their chosen course/job role.

8.2 All applicants who have made a disclosure will be referred to the Additional Needs and Disability Department (AND Department) who engage with the applicant to ensure that they are given information and advice about the support available.

8.3 Students who have declared an additional need or disability are assessed by the AND department. Depending on the age of the student, the course they are undertaking and their individual needs a recommended support plan is then put in place.

Specialist Support

8.4 Students that have an identifiable additional need or disability may be entitled to specialist support and/or equipment. It is the responsibility of the AND department to support students to apply for local and/or national funding.

8.5 Higher Education disabled students can apply for Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA). After they supply evidence of their disability they are invited to attend a Needs Assessment at a local Assessment Centre. The Assessor will write a report to outline what support is available.

8.6 Non Medical Help support includes Specialist Study Skills Tutors and Mentors.The Specialist Tutors are on the Association of Dyslexia Specialists in Higher Education (ADSHE) register, and the Specialist Mentor is accredited by the University Mental Health Advisors Network (UMHAN) ensuring they complete rigorous CPD and peer supervision. ACM offers remote study skills sessions and mentoring to all three campuses and face to face appointments in Guildford.

8.7 Students may also be entitled to assistive technology/software, printing costs, accommodation top ups and transport.

8.8 Further Education disabled students in receipt of an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) may be entitled to local authority funding. Learning Support Assistants and a Learning Support Officer may be allocated if required.

Facilities

8.9 The AND Department is located in ACM’s Guildford campus. It has a separate entrance to the main teaching areas so students can attend discreetly. The AND Department aims to have a calm and positive environment, where students feel welcome and comfortable. In Clapham and Birmingham students may access support via remote communication or on campus by appointment.

8.10 All areas in ACM buildings have disabled access and toilets. Where disabled access is not available ACM are committed to finding an alternative arrangement.

8.11 There is a no-food-or-drink policy in all teaching areas, enabling attendance of students at risk of anaphylaxis.

Allocation of resources

8.12 Students with an additional need or disability are either supported/advised by the Learning Support Officer (for Further Education) or Disability Officer (for Higher Education). Both roles sit within the Additional Needs and Disability department.

8.13 The Additional Needs and Disability Department is responsible for regulating and monitoring the allocation of resources.

Identification of needs

8.14 Students who declare their support needs, and satisfy data protection requirements, are identified to teaching staff through the Insight program, which flags the student’s name on the staff registers, enabling teaching staff to have instant access to the information entered. Staff are also advised when this information is updated.

8.15 Teaching staff may refer any student to the AND Department if they have concerns regarding the student’s support needs.

8.16 AND Department staff keep detailed records of support given to students and the progress made.

Access to the Curriculum

8.17 ACM takes positive steps to ensure that disabled students can fully participate in the education and other benefits, facilities and services provided for students.

8.18 This duty is anticipatory and continuing – ACM plans ahead and anticipates reasonable requirements of disabled students. This includes providing all documentation in a digital format and providing alternative forms of assessment as required.

Evaluating the success of provision

8.19 Records are kept of the attendance, retention and achievement of all students, including those with additional needs and disabilities.

Complaints

8.20 Complaints against ACM made by students are treated seriously and, if found to be valid, are acted upon to ensure that the students’ interests are protected as far as it is possible for ACM to do so.

8.21 Informal, and formal grievances can be made in accordance with the Student Complaints and Grievances Policy and Procedure. This can be found on the ACM website under policies or through the link https://www.acm.ac.uk/policies/

  1. EXHIBITS/APPENDICES/FORMS

There are no further exhibits, appendices or forms relevant to this Policy.

  1. SUPPORTING INFORMATION

There is no further supporting information relevant to this Policy.

  1. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW

Version:                         2.1

Approved on:               01 September 2025

Approved by:               Academic Board

Date of next review:    August 2026

Download 009 POL_009_Additional Needs and Disability

Policy 010: Safeguarding

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: anddegree@acm.ac.uk

Policy 010: SAFEGUARDING POLICY

1. PURPOSE

1.1 The purpose of the policy is to assist ACM in discharging its duties and commitments in respect of safeguarding students, staff and the wider community in institution-led activities fully, effectively and in accordance with statutory guidance and legislation. 

1.2 It is the intention of this Policy to promote high standards of personal and professional practice across the institution and outlines the procedures for staff to follow when concerns arise. 

1.3 This Policy has been written in accordance with, and with reference to, the statutory guidance and legislation as outlined in Item 8. 

2. POLICY DETAILS

2.1 The Academy of Contemporary Music is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of all students, staff, visitors and guests and acknowledges its particular responsibilities to children, young people and adults at risk. 

2.2 All staff within ACM have a responsibility to be involved in contributing to a culture in which safeguarding is embedded, discussed openly and risk proactively reduced. Every member of staff is DBS checked prior to commencing employment, and again every three years, and all staff members must complete training in the following areas: 

  • Safeguarding Young People
  • Mental Health Awareness in Children & Young People
  • An introduction to GDPR
  • Health and Safety in Education Awareness
  • The Prevent Duty
  • First Aid Essentials

2.3 All suspicions and allegations of abuse or concerns about radicalisation will be taken seriously by ACM and responded to appropriately involving referral to external agencies when deemed necessary. These suspicions and allegations will be acted upon immediately. 

2.4 ACM will ensure that there are established governance structures in place to ensure that all aspects relating to safeguarding are regularly audited, reviewed and monitored. 

2.5 All ACM students and staff are required to wear ID cards and lanyards at all times whilst on ACM premises. Any person or persons found to be on ACM premises without a valid ACM ID will be removed by security representatives. The main doors to ACM buildings are key card access only to ensure access is only granted to ACM students and staff, or supervised contractors. Any member of the ACM community found to be abusing this system (e.g. by granting access to another person by using their ID card), may be subject to staff or student disciplinary procedures. 

2.6 All visitors, guests and contractors etc. are required to register at the Campus Reception on arrival. They will be issued with, and must display at all times, a Visitor Pass and are required to return it on leaving the premises. A Safeguarding leaflet will also be issued which contains essential information for disclosure process, team information and also includes fire precautions and first aid information. 

2.7 All visitors, guests and contractors etc. will be made aware of and follow ACM’s safeguarding policy. They will recognise, respond to and report any concerns that come to their attention regarding the safety and/or welfare of a young person or vulnerable adult. 

2.8 ACM’s safeguarding policy and procedure are supported by the Safeguarding Team. The safeguarding team must remain aware of all safeguarding policies and procedures and be able to communicate them effectively to all staff. They are responsible for providing comprehensive safeguarding inductions, regular training and reinforcing staff responsibility to recognise, report and respond to concerns. 

2.9 The ACM safeguarding team consists of the Designated Safeguarding Lead and a team of Deputy Designated Safeguarding Leads, and is responsible for responding to safeguarding disclosures under the direction of the DSL. Such actions may include, referring allegations to the relevant investigating agencies such as Local authority , Police, Channel panel, social services; Attending Child In Need meetings and Child Protection conferences. 

2.10 ACM is committed to providing clear and easy to follow procedures for management of all concerns, including those that are deemed low level. In addition to its safeguarding provision, ACM has established procedures to enable staff to raise low level concerns about staff competency, organisational risk and reputational risk. 

2.11 Notwithstanding the measures in place to safeguard children and young people, and ACM’s commitment to students in need of extra support as outlined in Section 8 of the Additional Needs and Disability Policy, ACM does not act in loco parentis for registered students under 18. 

3. POLICY SCOPE

3.1 The policy applies to all members of the ACM community, including students at all levels and campuses, staff, applicants, associate members, visitors, contractors and volunteers. 

3.2 All ACM campuses have students under the age of 18 participating in courses or events, our safeguarding policy and training programme is developed in line with Keeping Children Safe in Education for both our Higher and Further Education provision. All staff adhere to recommendations and necessary requirements stated within this legislation regardless of role or position. 

4. RELATED POLICIES

  • Safeguarding Procedures 
  • Staff Code of Conduct 
  • Student Charter 
  • Data Protection Policy 
  • Prevent Policy 
  • External Speaker and Events Policy 
  • Acceptable Use of IT and E-Safety Policy 
  • Social Media Policy 
  • Student Disciplinary Policy 
  • Student Complaints and Grievances Policy 
  • Equality & Diversity Policy 
  • Staff Recruitment Policy 
  • Health & Safety Policy 
  • Whistleblowing Policy 
  • Criminal Convictions Policy 

5. POLICY OWNER

The responsibility for this Policy falls under the remit of the Safeguarding and Pastoral Services Manager, overseen by the Student Experience and Quality Committee. This role is supported under the Integrated Services Division. 

The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework.

6. DEFINITIONS

DSL: Designated Safeguarding Lead is the member of staff that coordinates all safeguarding concerns and oversees all referrals. 

DDSL: Deputy Designated Safeguarding Lead is the member of staff who supports the DSL in maintaining the function of safeguarding throughout all campuses. 

LADO: Local Authority Designated Officer 

ABUSE: A form of maltreatment of a person. Somebody may abuse or neglect another person by inflicting harm or by failing to act to prevent harm. Someone may be abused in a family or in an institutional or community setting by those known to them or, more rarely, by others. Abuse can take place either wholly online, or technology may be used to facilitate offline abuse. People may be abused by an adult or adults or by young people. 

PHYSICAL ABUSE: A form of abuse which may involve hitting, shaking, throwing, poisoning, burning or scalding, drowning, suffocating or otherwise causing physical harm to anyone. Physical harm may also be caused when a responsible adult fabricates the symptoms of, or deliberately induces, illness in someone. 

EMOTIONAL ABUSE: The persistent emotional maltreatment of a person such as to cause severe and adverse effects on that person’s emotional development. It may involve conveying to a person that they are worthless or unloved, inadequate, or valued only insofar as they meet the needs of another person. It may include not giving the person opportunities to express their views, deliberately silencing them or ‘making fun’ of what they say or how they communicate. It may feature age or developmentally inappropriate expectations being imposed on people. These may include interactions that are beyond a person’s developmental capability as well as overprotection and limitation of exploration and learning or preventing the person from participating in normal social interaction. It may involve seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another. It may involve serious bullying (including cyberbullying), causing people frequently to feel frightened or in danger, or the exploitation or corruption of people. Some level of emotional abuse is involved in all types of maltreatment of a child, although it may occur alone. 

SEXUAL ABUSE: Involves forcing or enticing someone to take part in sexual activities, not necessarily involving violence, whether or not the person is aware of what is happening. The activities may involve physical contact, including assault by penetration (for example rape or oral sex) or non-penetrative acts such as masturbation, kissing, rubbing, and touching outside of clothing. They may also include non-contact activities, such as involving someone in looking at, or in the production of, sexual images, watching sexual activities, encouraging people to behave in sexually inappropriate ways, or grooming someone in preparation for abuse. Sexual abuse can take place online, and technology can be used to facilitate offline abuse. Sexual abuse is not solely perpetrated by adult males. Women can also commit acts of sexual abuse, as can people under the age of 18. The sexual abuse of children by other children is a specific safeguarding issue (also known as peer on peer abuse) in education and all staff should be aware of it and ACM’s policy and procedure for dealing with it. 

NEGLECT: The persistent failure to meet someone’s basic physical and/or psychological needs, likely to result in the serious impairment of the person’s health or development. Neglect may occur during pregnancy, for example, as a result of maternal substance abuse. Once a child is born, neglect may involve a parent or carer failing to: provide adequate food, clothing and shelter (including exclusion from home or abandonment); protect a child from physical and emotional harm or danger; ensure adequate supervision (including the use of inadequate care-givers); or ensure access to appropriate medical care or treatment. It may also include neglect of, or unresponsiveness to, a child’s basic emotional needs. 

CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION (CSE) and CHILD CRIMINAL EXPLOITATION (CCE) Both CSE and CCE are forms of abuse and both occur where an individual or group takes advantage of an imbalance in power to coerce, manipulate or deceive a child into sexual or criminal activity in exchange for something the victim needs or wants, and/or for the financial advantage or increased status of the perpetrator or facilitator and/or through violence or the threat of violence. CSE and CCE can affect children, both male and female and can include children who have been moved (commonly referred to as trafficking) for the purpose of exploitation. 

SERIOUS VIOLENCE: Indicators may signal someone is at risk from or is involved with serious violent crime. These may include increased absence from education, a change in friendships or relationships with older individuals or groups, a significant decline in performance, signs of self-harm or a significant change in wellbeing, or signs of assault or unexplained injuries. Unexplained gifts or new possessions could also indicate that someone has been approached by, or are involved with, individuals associated with criminal networks or gangs and may be at risk of criminal exploitation. 

MENTAL HEALTH: Mental health problems can, in some cases, be an indicator that a person has suffered or is at risk of suffering abuse, neglect or exploitation. Only appropriately trained professionals should attempt to make a diagnosis of a mental health problem. ACM staff, however, are well placed to observe students day-to-day and identify those whose behaviour suggests that they may be experiencing a mental health problem or be at risk of developing one. 

FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM): FGM is a procedure where the female genitals are deliberately cut, injured or changed, even though there is no medical reason for this to be done. It is also referred to as female circumcision. If a member of staff, in the course of their work, discovers that an act of FGM appears to have been carried out, they must report this to the DSL or DDSL and it must be reported to the police. 

PEER ON PEER ABUSE: Children can abuse other children and it can happen inside or outside the institution and online. Even if there are no reports from within the institution, it does not mean it is not happening; it may be the case that it is just not being reported. It is therefore important if staff have any concerns, they should contact the Designated Safeguarding Lead or Deputy. Inappropriate behaviours between peers that are abusive in nature should be challenged. Downplaying certain behaviours, for example dismissing sexual harassment as “just banter”, “just having a laugh” can lead to a culture of unacceptable behaviours, an unsafe environment for people and in worst case scenarios a culture that normalises abuse leading to people accepting it as normal and not coming forward to report it. Peer on peer abuse is seen as a specific safeguarding concern. ACM therefore additionally covers peer on peer abuse in a separate policy and procedures document. 

7. PROCEDURES

The procedure that accompanies this safeguarding policy is Procedure 010: Safeguarding Procedure, and can be found at acm.ac.uk/policies

8. EXHIBITS/ APPENDICES/ FORMS

This Policy has been written in accordance with, and with reference to, the following statutory guidance and legislation: 

  • Keeping Children Safe in Education (DfE, 2022) 
  • Working Together to Safeguard Children (HM Government, 2018)
  • What to do if you’re worried a child is being abused (DfE, 2015)
  • The Prevent Duty (DfE, 2015, updated 2019) 
  • Child sexual exploitation; definition and guide for practitioners (DfE, 2017)
  • Sexual violence and harassment between children in schools and colleges (DfE, 2018) 
  • The Children Act 2004 (with later amendments) 
  • Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006
  • The Sexual Offences Act 2003
  • Office for Students (OfS) Condition E6
  • Guidance for English Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) (DIUS, 2007)
  • Protection of Freedoms Act 2012
  • Children and Families Act 2014
  • Care Act 2014 
  • Information sharing: advice for practitioners providing safeguarding services to children, young people, parents and carers (HM Government, July 2018) 

9. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

There are no further supporting documents to this Policy.

10. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW

Version:                       6.1

Approved on:             01 September 2025

Approved by:              Academic Board

Date of next review:  August 2026

Download: Policy 010_ SAFEGUARDING POLICY

Policy 011: Fitness to Study

If you have a disability which makes reading this document or navigating our website difficult and you would like to receive information in an alternative format, please contact: and@acm.ac.uk 

Policy 011: FITNESS TO STUDY

  1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

1.1 This policy outlines how the Academy of Contemporary Music (ACM) ensures that there is a consistent and supportive approach when assessing an individual’s capacity to satisfactorily participate and fully engage as an ACM student. 

1.2 This policy applies to all prospective students, applicants, and current students, and is designed to ensure that students are treated in a fair and equitable manner. 

1.3 The content of this policy aligns with government legislation, the regulations of ACM’s validating partners and other external stakeholders to whom ACM must make reference. 

  1. POLICY STATEMENT

Fitness to Study 

2.1 ‘Fitness to study’ refers to an individual’s capacity to participate fully and satisfactorily as a student, in relation to their academic studies and life generally at ACM. 

2.2 Capacity refers to an individual’s ability to make authoritative and objective decisions regarding their well-being or academic progress. Capacity refers to temporary or permanent impairment. 

2.3 ACM recognises that ensuring the mental and physical well-being of its students is crucial to their learning and academic achievement. ACM is committed to supporting and responding to student needs and to seeking to ensure a positive experience which assists students to engage with their studies and the local community. 

2.4 ACM is committed to the involvement of individual students in the management of their health, wellbeing, or exceptional personal circumstances and will work with them to make arrangements for support in order to break down any barriers to their education. 

2.5 There may be instances where a student’s health or well-being causes ACM concern regarding the student’s fitness to study on their programme/course. ACM has a duty of care to respond appropriately to situations where there are concerns relating to visible signs of illness, mental health difficulties, psychological, personality or emotional disorders, safeguarding concerns, and the detrimental impact on the functioning of the individual student and/or other members of the ACM community. 

When to use this policy

2.6 This policy should be used in circumstances where as a result of a known or suspected underlying physical or mental health impairment: 

  • A student has disclosed concerns regarding their own fitness to study, in relation to factors concerned with their health, wellbeing, or other circumstances that pose prohibitive to effective engagement with their studies and wider participation with ACM. 
  • A student’s ability to study is neither manageable nor achievable in relation to specific tasks and/or activities; 
  • A student poses a risk to their own health, safety and/or wellbeing and/or that of other persons;
  • The student’s behaviour is, or is at risk of, negatively affecting the teaching, learning and/or experience of other students; 
  • The student’s behaviour is, or is at risk of, negatively affecting the day-to-day activities of ACM. 

2.7 This policy should be used when a student’s fitness to study is a cause for concern and all other procedures, processes or options to support the student have been considered or exhausted. 

2.8 ACM may choose to initiate another process either alongside or in place of this policy where the process, procedure or policy relates to a student’s conduct and well-being. 

2.9 Staff who have any level of concern about a student’s health or behaviour should consider use of this policy. If there is a concern of this nature, it is appropriate to explore the student’s well being and behaviour, and agree supportive action rather than enter into a disciplinary procedure. If a member of staff is unsure about whether to implement this procedure, they can seek advice and discuss their concern with ACM’s Designated Safeguarding Lead or a member of the ACM Safeguarding Team. 

2.10 This policy may also be applied if there are concerns about a prospective student or applicant to ACM, which may result in a refusal of a place on application or during the induction period if it is identified that ACM cannot meet the needs of the student concerned. 

  1. POLICY OWNER 

3.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Student Engagement and Quality Committee. The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework. 

Implementation and compliance with the Policy, and associated procedures will be overseen by the following designated staff: 

  • Registrar 
  • Registry Manager
  • Designated Safeguarding Lead 
  • Group Lead on Student Experience 
  • Additional Needs and Disability Coordinator 
  • Wellbeing Coordinator 
  • Admissions Manager

     4. REFERENCE POINTS

4.1. Internal: 

  • Academic Integrity Policy 
  • Admissions Policy 
  • Additional Needs and Disabilities Policy 
  • Safeguarding Policy 
  • Student Complaints & Grievances Policy 
  • Student Disciplinary Policy 

4.2. External: 

  • Equality Act 2000 
  • QAA Quality Code 
  • Mental Capacity Act 2005 
  • OIA Good Practice Framework 
  • Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards

 

     5. DATE OF APPROVAL AND NEXT REVIEW

Version: 2.0

Approved on:    01 Sep 2025

Approved by:    Academic Board

Next Review:     August 2026 

Download: POL_011_Fitness to Study