Student Protection Plan

PURPOSE  The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to  maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material  change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions,…

  1. PURPOSE 

The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to  maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material  change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions, closures, or institutional closure. This policy  statement outlines the plan in place. 

  1. POLICY DETAILS 

Provider’s name: ACM Guildford Ltd, trading as ACM 

Provider’s UKPRN:10067853 

Legal Address: Rodboro Buildings, Bridge Street, Guildford, GU1 4SB 

Contact point for enquiries about this student protection plan: 

exec@acm.ac.uk 

01483 500840

 

Student Protection Plan, effective from 2025/26 

  1. Introduction 

1.1 ACM is committed to helping ensure students achieve the best academic outcomes from  their studies. Events may occasionally occur which mean that unforeseen changes have to  be made to modules or programmes.  

1.2 The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to  maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material  change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions, closures, or institutional closure. 

1.3 These events may be triggered by situations such as (but not limited to): 

  • significant material change; 
  • a decision to close the institution has been taken; 
  • a strategic decision by the institution to close a course or campus; 
  • withdrawal of designation for student support services; 
  • a decision is taken to not run a course for the subsequent year; 
  • major changes in year to course content; 
  • changes to regulatory framework affecting a specific course; 
  • loss of accreditation from regulatory bodies; 
  • disruption of institutional activity (e.g. temporary disruption within term-time not  covered by any of the above; 
  • industrial action by institution staff or third parties; 
  • the unanticipated departure of key members of institution staff. 

1.4 This plan lays out the measures that ACM, and where applicable its validating university  partner, will take in order to protect the student interests and assure continuity of study in the  event of course campus or Institution change or closure.

  1. An assessment of the range of risks to the continuation for students, how those  risks may differ based on students’ needs, characteristics and circumstances, and  the likelihood that those risks would materialise: 

2.1 Major changes in year to course content 

2.1.1 ACM delivers a relatively small portfolio of programmes within the area of music and  the wider creative industries; an area that is generally considered to be rapidly evolving and  changing. In order to ensure that programme content and learning outcomes remain fit for  purpose and relevant it may be necessary for us to make changes to course content. The  design of the programmes is such that flexibility is accommodated within the module  learning outcomes so that major changes to course content are not normally necessary and  can easily be accommodated with no negative impact to the student experience. However, it  is possible that a major change may be necessary to ensure that a programme remains fit  for purpose. In such cases appropriate measures will be put in place, as outlined below.  

2.2. Closure of an individual programme 

2.2.1 ACM’s programme strategy is such that the majority of students at the institution are  on one of a small number of awards rather than small numbers on many different  programmes. Consequently, programme closure is considered an unlikely event and  historically this has proven to be the case. 

2.2.2 It is possible that where there might be insufficient numbers on an individual discipline  within a course it may be necessary to close a particular pathway prior to commencement.  However, whilst there is no precedence for this happening and it is also considered low risk,  should such a situation occur appropriate measures are outlined below. 

2.2.3 Currently there are no plans or proposed strategies to close individual programmes for  other reasons. 

2.3. Closure of a specific site or campus 

2.3.1 Institutional failure will be monitored through risk management in accordance with HE  regulatory bodies. This monitoring assesses the financial sustainability management and  governance of the institution. Following a sale of the registered entity in May 2025 the risk of  a specific site closure is marked as medium risk. The risk rating has been raised from low to  medium in June 2025 following the sale of the registered entity and de-coupling from its  former parent company, ACM Commercial Ltd. The parent company held leases for several  buildings used by students and ACM Guildford Ltd is currently re-negotiating leases with  landlords to mitigate the risk of the closure of buildings. 

2.3.2 ACM operates campus locations in Guildford, Birmingham and London. Whilst the  institution-level risk rating is medium, this differentiates for each campus location. Despite  the global risk rating being marked as medium, it is not considered a risk that a specific  location will be removed or forced to close due to the advanced status of negotiations on at  least one building in each location.

2.3.3 The Birmingham site closure is low risk. ACM operates two buildings in Birmingham  and both have the lease assigned to ACM Guildford Ltd. 

2.3.4 The Guildford site closure is currently medium risk. ACM operates three buildings used  by higher education students in Guildford. The lease of one building (the Bridge) is assigned  to ACM Guildford Ltd. The leases of the two other buildings (Rodboro and the Billings) are  currently assigned to ACM Commercial Ltd but ACM Guildford Ltd are at an advanced stage  of re-negotiations with Head of Terms produced and agreed. The expectation is that leases  will be re-assigned before the start of the 25/26 academic year. Once the new leases have  been signed this risk rating will return to low. 

2.3.5 The London site closure is currently medium risk. ACM operates two buildings in  London, both of which are current leased by ACM Commercial Ltd. Advanced negotiations  are in place for the Bromells Road building in Clapham with heads of terms agreed and  contracts being produced. This is expected to be concluded before the 25/26 academic year.  Negotiations are yet to begin on the Brixton House building in Brixton as the landlord is  concluding discussions and the end to the current lease with former parent company, ACM  Commercial Ltd before embarking on a tendering exercise for a new tenant lease. Whilst  ACM Guildford Ltd hope to gain access to the building through a new tendering exercise it is  considered high risk at present for this building specifically. Mitigations have been put in  place to ensure student facilities are unaffected with equipment and resources moved to the  Bromells Road site ensuring a comparable student experience which gives an overall  medium risk level for the London campus location.  

2.3.6 Currently there are no plans or proposed strategy to close sites or campuses for other  reasons.  

2.3.7 Following the impact of the Coronavirus in early 2020, plans were put in place to  continue delivery through provision of remote learning, and to keep ACM campuses open for  staff and other services. Whilst it is difficult to predict events of this nature the aim will  always be to continue programme delivery wherever possible.  

2.4 Withdrawal or non-renewal of validation 

2.4.1 ACM current validation agreement with Middlesex University has been in place for  nearly 20 years and such withdrawal or non-renewal of validation is considered a low risk. 

2.4.2 Middlesex University remain an engaged partner and have signalled support for ACM  Guildford Ltd who intend to apply for probationary degree awarding powers during the 25/26  academic year. Student contracts have been redrafted to enable ACM awards to be  awarded in the event of degree awarding powers being in place, or Middlesex University  awards to be awarded in the event degree awarding powers are not in place for ACM  Guildford Ltd. Middlesex University have signalled on-going support through the degree  awarding powers process. 

2.4.3 ACM has, in the past, worked with more than one university validating partner and has  experienced non-renewal of validation following change in strategic direction of the  university. In such a case appropriate measures were put in place to ensure students were  not disadvantaged. Whilst withdrawal or non-renewal is not currently considered a high risk,  should such an event occur appropriate measures have been considered below.

2.5 Institutional closure 

2.5.1 Institutional failure is monitored through risk management in accordance with HE  regulatory bodies. This monitoring assesses the financial sustainability management and  governance of the institution. This includes an external audit process that takes place at the  end of each financial year. For the most recent completed financial year, ending in August  2024, the auditors were satisfied and have signed off on ACM’s accounts as a going  concern. 

2.5.2 Whilst ACM has no strategic plans for partial or full institutional closure, the current  higher education landscape, and ACM’s recent change of ownership means that the risk  level for institutional closure has been assessed as medium. 

2.6 Loss of key staff 

2.6.1 ACM employs a large number of specialist teaching staff, both as contracted  employees and sessional staff. Many of these have high profile careers with national and  international reputations. Staff profiles are provided on the ACM websites and in other  promotional material although tutors are not promoted as being linked to a specific module  or class and no implication that students will be taught by a specific member of staff is given. 

2.6.2 Recruitment strategy ensures that the tutor faculty typically has multiple staff covering  specific subject areas thereby reducing any potential risk to the student experience through  loss of key teaching staff. 

2.6.3 Management and governance strategy is primarily based on senior and executive staff  teams contributing to the management and oversight of activities rather than through the  apex of a single member of staff or principal. This ensures broad engagement of  stakeholders and the effective use of expertise, whilst minimising risks that might be  attached to the loss of key staff. 

2.6.4 This is therefore considered low risk. 

2.7 Failure to achieve or maintain (after the DAPs probationary period has ended)  authorisation for DAPs 

2.7.1 If ACM does not achieve or maintain degree-awarding powers, ACM will continue with  its existing validation partnership agreement with Middlesex University.  

2.7.2 The failure to achieve or maintain degree awarding powers is considered medium risk  during the scrutiny process. However, appropriate mitigations have been put in place, with  the existing validating partner being maintained to ensure a validated programme is  available to students in the event of ACM’s degree awarding powers being revoked or not  granted.

  1. The measures put in place to mitigate those risks considered feasible 

N.B. These are not necessarily risks considered likely to happen (as outlined above).  However, measures have been considered regardless. 

3.1 Major changes in year to course content 

3.1.1 ACM will use all reasonable endeavours to deliver the programme in accordance with  the description provided in the ACM prospectus or other material provided, for the academic  year in which a student began their programme. 

3.1.2 Major and minor changes to programmes are approved in accordance with academic  regulations, with changes becoming effective from the subsequent academic year. 

3.1.3.In the event where changes to course content do take place in-year, this will not  include variations to learning outcomes. ACM will ensure that changes are restricted to the  minimum necessary to achieve the required quality of experience, and affected students are  notified and consulted as appropriate and provided with a rationale as to why a change  might be needed. 

3.1.4 Where necessary it will allow students the opportunity to withdraw from the programme  and where required offer reasonable support to transfer to another programme at ACM, or to  another provider.  

3.2 Closure of an individual programme 

3.2.1 In the event that it is necessary to suspend or close a course and where there is a  material impact on students, the effect will be mitigated by: 

  • communication with current students to provide assurance that they will not be  adversely affected by the decision and provide assurance that they are able to  complete their studies at the institution;  
  • consultation with stakeholders who may be affected to ensure appropriate equality  impact assessments will also be undertaken; 
  • future applicants will be notified in accordance with UCAS deadlines, allowing time  for students to source alternative suitable programme (where relevant) at ACM.  

3.3 Closure of a specific site or campus 

3.3.1 Where ACM has no option, other than to close a specific building, site or campus, the  following measures will be considered: 

  • where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner over a period that would  enable current students to complete their studies at the original campus location the  student has selected. If a single or multiple building(s) close within a campus  location, efforts will be made to ensure the same level of equipment and facilities are  available across the remaining buildings at a campus location where possible. 
  • where it is not possible to continue operating in a transitional manner, in supporting  students to transfer to appropriate programmes within the ACM portfolio at a different  campus location, or at other suitable providers, and (where appropriate financially) by compensating students where, because of disruption to their studies, they suffer  demonstrable, material financial loss.3.3.2 Where part of a campus is rendered unusable for activities involving students, ACM  will typically consider the following measures: 
    • relocating provision to an alternative location, this may include hiring spaces for  programme delivery (where possible nearby) and /or installing temporary buildings;
    • revising timetabling to allow all of the scheduled teaching to take part in the available  facilities. This may include timetabling sessions being held outside of normal  teaching hours. Where such an approach is taken, appropriate consultation will  normally be conducted with stakeholders who may be affected; 
    • undertaking appropriate equality impact assessment.  

    3.4 Withdrawal or non-renewal of validation 

    3.4.1 In the event of withdrawal or non-renewal of validation ACM will take all reasonable  steps to minimise the resulting disruption to students by, for example:  

    • working with the validating partner to allow enrolled students to complete their  programme at their existing campus location through a ‘teach-out’ arrangement;
    • working with a new university partner to provide validation of the programme, or  comparable programme; 
    • where either of the above is not possible, supporting students to transfer to  programmes at other providers and, where appropriate, financially compensating  students where they suffer demonstrable, material financial loss because of  disruption to their studies.  

    3.5 Institutional closure 

    3.5.1 Where ACM has no option, other than full institutional closure, the following measures  will be considered in the following order: 

    1. where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner over a period that would  enable current students to complete their studies at the institution; 
    2. where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner until the end of the  current academic year that would enable students to complete their studies or gain  an exit award. During this transition period, efforts will be made to find a credible  buyer to take ownership of ACM Guildford Ltd and its subsidiaries. 
    3. If a credible buyer cannot be found that will enable continuity of the student  experience, ACM will enable the validating institution (if under validation  arrangements) to continue teaching students on existing programmes at ACM sites,  or a suitable alternative location. To achieve this ACM will ensure student data,  programme information and materials, staff (as appropriate), facilities and resources  (where possible) and forthcoming tuition fee income are made available to the  validating institution. 
    4. If the validating institution is not able to undertake delivery itself, or if ACM is not in a  validation partnership at the time of institutional closure, or it is not possible to continue operating in a transitional manner, ACM or the validating institution will  support students to transfer to appropriate programmes at other suitable providers.
      1. where is it not possible for students to continue studying in a transitional manner with  ACM, its validating institution, or a suitable alternative provider, ACM will seek to  compensate students for tuition fees pertaining to outstanding credits at the point of  institutional closure, if possible, within the boundaries of the administration process 

      3.6 Loss of key staff 

      3.6.1 Where possible ACM will: 

      • Seek to fill gaps as quickly as possible, by moving other current members of staff  with appropriate skills and experience, into the vacant post(s) or recruiting externally,  to avoid disruption; 
      • Where ACM cannot avoid closing a programme, due to loss of key staff, the policy as  outlined in section 3.2 will apply.  
      1. Information about the policy in place to refund tuition fees and other relevant costs  to your students and to provide compensation where necessary in the event that you  are no longer able to preserve continuity. 

      4.1 Information regarding Refunds and Compensation Policy is made available to  prospective students and applicants via ACM’s website (www.acm.ac.uk/policies/) as well as  included within ACM’s internal assets, such as the student-facing virtual learning  environment. The policy is subject to a cyclical period of review, to align with the review and  update of all ACM’s policies and procedures, ensuring consistency and alignment with  current practice. 

      1. Information about how ACM will communicate with students about the student  protection plan 

      5.1 Students will be provided access to the Student Protection Plan via the public website  and the student portal. 

      5.2 Students have representation within the committee structure in which we would normally  expect activity likely to impact on student experience and their programme of study to be  discussed.  

      5.3 Should the protection plan need to be implemented students will be contacted by a  member of the senior management team at the earliest opportunity following a decision that  an applicable change was decided upon or notified to the institution.  

      5.4 ACM will take reasonable steps to avoid implementing change during an academic year  or making changes close to the start of an academic year.  

      5.5 ACM will undertake to update the website and presence on UCAS and other institutional  listing services at the earliest opportunity on notification of a significant change. 

  1. Student involvement in the review of the plan 

6.1 Students will have the opportunity to contribute to a review of the plan (including the  Refunds and Compensation policy) to ensure that their views, interests and needs are taken  into account. 

6.2 The plan will be reviewed annually, with student involvement, before its publication for  students enrolled on the 2025/26 academic year. 

6.3 Student engagement in the review will be undertaken through the formal student voice  meetings on an annual basis. The meetings have student representatives from across all  programmes and sites.  

6.4 Where variations to the plan take place in-year, students will be able to view the revised  plan once a version has been approved by the regulator. 

  1. Complaints 

7.1 Students who are dissatisfied with ACM may wish to make use of ACM’s complaints and  grievances procedure. ACM seeks to resolve all complaints and grievances in a timely  manner through considered escalation of concerns as outlined in ACM’s Complaints and  Grievances procedure, which is available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

  1. POLICY SCOPE 

8.1 The policy applies to ACM Guildford Ltd campuses (Guildford, Birmingham and London)  registered with the OfS on Middlesex University validated higher education programmes and  students, staff, applicants, associate members, visitors and contractors connected to those  campuses and those programmes. 

  1. RELATED POLICIES 

9.1 ACM Refunds and Compensation Policy is available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/ 

  1. POLICY OWNER 

10.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Senior Management Team. The  responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under  ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework. 

10.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be  authorised by the Accountable Officer.

  1. DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW Version: 1.7 

Version: 1.7

Approved on: 10 September 2025 

Approved by: Senior Management Team

Download this policy here: ACM Student Protection Plan 

-->