Student Protection Plan
PURPOSE The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions,…
- PURPOSE
The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions, closures, or institutional closure. This policy statement outlines the plan in place.
- POLICY DETAILS
Provider’s name: ACM Guildford Ltd, trading as ACM
Provider’s UKPRN:10067853
Legal Address: Rodboro Buildings, Bridge Street, Guildford, GU1 4SB
Contact point for enquiries about this student protection plan:
exec@acm.ac.uk
01483 500840
Student Protection Plan, effective from 2025/26
- Introduction
1.1 ACM is committed to helping ensure students achieve the best academic outcomes from their studies. Events may occasionally occur which mean that unforeseen changes have to be made to modules or programmes.
1.2 The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 requires higher education providers to maintain a Student Protection Plan to protect students’ interests in the case of material change, e.g. programme changes, suspensions, closures, or institutional closure.
1.3 These events may be triggered by situations such as (but not limited to):
- significant material change;
- a decision to close the institution has been taken;
- a strategic decision by the institution to close a course or campus;
- withdrawal of designation for student support services;
- a decision is taken to not run a course for the subsequent year;
- major changes in year to course content;
- changes to regulatory framework affecting a specific course;
- loss of accreditation from regulatory bodies;
- disruption of institutional activity (e.g. temporary disruption within term-time not covered by any of the above;
- industrial action by institution staff or third parties;
- the unanticipated departure of key members of institution staff.
1.4 This plan lays out the measures that ACM, and where applicable its validating university partner, will take in order to protect the student interests and assure continuity of study in the event of course campus or Institution change or closure.
- An assessment of the range of risks to the continuation for students, how those risks may differ based on students’ needs, characteristics and circumstances, and the likelihood that those risks would materialise:
2.1 Major changes in year to course content
2.1.1 ACM delivers a relatively small portfolio of programmes within the area of music and the wider creative industries; an area that is generally considered to be rapidly evolving and changing. In order to ensure that programme content and learning outcomes remain fit for purpose and relevant it may be necessary for us to make changes to course content. The design of the programmes is such that flexibility is accommodated within the module learning outcomes so that major changes to course content are not normally necessary and can easily be accommodated with no negative impact to the student experience. However, it is possible that a major change may be necessary to ensure that a programme remains fit for purpose. In such cases appropriate measures will be put in place, as outlined below.
2.2. Closure of an individual programme
2.2.1 ACM’s programme strategy is such that the majority of students at the institution are on one of a small number of awards rather than small numbers on many different programmes. Consequently, programme closure is considered an unlikely event and historically this has proven to be the case.
2.2.2 It is possible that where there might be insufficient numbers on an individual discipline within a course it may be necessary to close a particular pathway prior to commencement. However, whilst there is no precedence for this happening and it is also considered low risk, should such a situation occur appropriate measures are outlined below.
2.2.3 Currently there are no plans or proposed strategies to close individual programmes for other reasons.
2.3. Closure of a specific site or campus
2.3.1 Institutional failure will be monitored through risk management in accordance with HE regulatory bodies. This monitoring assesses the financial sustainability management and governance of the institution. Following a sale of the registered entity in May 2025 the risk of a specific site closure is marked as medium risk. The risk rating has been raised from low to medium in June 2025 following the sale of the registered entity and de-coupling from its former parent company, ACM Commercial Ltd. The parent company held leases for several buildings used by students and ACM Guildford Ltd is currently re-negotiating leases with landlords to mitigate the risk of the closure of buildings.
2.3.2 ACM operates campus locations in Guildford, Birmingham and London. Whilst the institution-level risk rating is medium, this differentiates for each campus location. Despite the global risk rating being marked as medium, it is not considered a risk that a specific location will be removed or forced to close due to the advanced status of negotiations on at least one building in each location.
2.3.3 The Birmingham site closure is low risk. ACM operates two buildings in Birmingham and both have the lease assigned to ACM Guildford Ltd.
2.3.4 The Guildford site closure is currently medium risk. ACM operates three buildings used by higher education students in Guildford. The lease of one building (the Bridge) is assigned to ACM Guildford Ltd. The leases of the two other buildings (Rodboro and the Billings) are currently assigned to ACM Commercial Ltd but ACM Guildford Ltd are at an advanced stage of re-negotiations with Head of Terms produced and agreed. The expectation is that leases will be re-assigned before the start of the 25/26 academic year. Once the new leases have been signed this risk rating will return to low.
2.3.5 The London site closure is currently medium risk. ACM operates two buildings in London, both of which are current leased by ACM Commercial Ltd. Advanced negotiations are in place for the Bromells Road building in Clapham with heads of terms agreed and contracts being produced. This is expected to be concluded before the 25/26 academic year. Negotiations are yet to begin on the Brixton House building in Brixton as the landlord is concluding discussions and the end to the current lease with former parent company, ACM Commercial Ltd before embarking on a tendering exercise for a new tenant lease. Whilst ACM Guildford Ltd hope to gain access to the building through a new tendering exercise it is considered high risk at present for this building specifically. Mitigations have been put in place to ensure student facilities are unaffected with equipment and resources moved to the Bromells Road site ensuring a comparable student experience which gives an overall medium risk level for the London campus location.
2.3.6 Currently there are no plans or proposed strategy to close sites or campuses for other reasons.
2.3.7 Following the impact of the Coronavirus in early 2020, plans were put in place to continue delivery through provision of remote learning, and to keep ACM campuses open for staff and other services. Whilst it is difficult to predict events of this nature the aim will always be to continue programme delivery wherever possible.
2.4 Withdrawal or non-renewal of validation
2.4.1 ACM current validation agreement with Middlesex University has been in place for nearly 20 years and such withdrawal or non-renewal of validation is considered a low risk.
2.4.2 Middlesex University remain an engaged partner and have signalled support for ACM Guildford Ltd who intend to apply for probationary degree awarding powers during the 25/26 academic year. Student contracts have been redrafted to enable ACM awards to be awarded in the event of degree awarding powers being in place, or Middlesex University awards to be awarded in the event degree awarding powers are not in place for ACM Guildford Ltd. Middlesex University have signalled on-going support through the degree awarding powers process.
2.4.3 ACM has, in the past, worked with more than one university validating partner and has experienced non-renewal of validation following change in strategic direction of the university. In such a case appropriate measures were put in place to ensure students were not disadvantaged. Whilst withdrawal or non-renewal is not currently considered a high risk, should such an event occur appropriate measures have been considered below.
2.5 Institutional closure
2.5.1 Institutional failure is monitored through risk management in accordance with HE regulatory bodies. This monitoring assesses the financial sustainability management and governance of the institution. This includes an external audit process that takes place at the end of each financial year. For the most recent completed financial year, ending in August 2024, the auditors were satisfied and have signed off on ACM’s accounts as a going concern.
2.5.2 Whilst ACM has no strategic plans for partial or full institutional closure, the current higher education landscape, and ACM’s recent change of ownership means that the risk level for institutional closure has been assessed as medium.
2.6 Loss of key staff
2.6.1 ACM employs a large number of specialist teaching staff, both as contracted employees and sessional staff. Many of these have high profile careers with national and international reputations. Staff profiles are provided on the ACM websites and in other promotional material although tutors are not promoted as being linked to a specific module or class and no implication that students will be taught by a specific member of staff is given.
2.6.2 Recruitment strategy ensures that the tutor faculty typically has multiple staff covering specific subject areas thereby reducing any potential risk to the student experience through loss of key teaching staff.
2.6.3 Management and governance strategy is primarily based on senior and executive staff teams contributing to the management and oversight of activities rather than through the apex of a single member of staff or principal. This ensures broad engagement of stakeholders and the effective use of expertise, whilst minimising risks that might be attached to the loss of key staff.
2.6.4 This is therefore considered low risk.
2.7 Failure to achieve or maintain (after the DAPs probationary period has ended) authorisation for DAPs
2.7.1 If ACM does not achieve or maintain degree-awarding powers, ACM will continue with its existing validation partnership agreement with Middlesex University.
2.7.2 The failure to achieve or maintain degree awarding powers is considered medium risk during the scrutiny process. However, appropriate mitigations have been put in place, with the existing validating partner being maintained to ensure a validated programme is available to students in the event of ACM’s degree awarding powers being revoked or not granted.
- The measures put in place to mitigate those risks considered feasible
N.B. These are not necessarily risks considered likely to happen (as outlined above). However, measures have been considered regardless.
3.1 Major changes in year to course content
3.1.1 ACM will use all reasonable endeavours to deliver the programme in accordance with the description provided in the ACM prospectus or other material provided, for the academic year in which a student began their programme.
3.1.2 Major and minor changes to programmes are approved in accordance with academic regulations, with changes becoming effective from the subsequent academic year.
3.1.3.In the event where changes to course content do take place in-year, this will not include variations to learning outcomes. ACM will ensure that changes are restricted to the minimum necessary to achieve the required quality of experience, and affected students are notified and consulted as appropriate and provided with a rationale as to why a change might be needed.
3.1.4 Where necessary it will allow students the opportunity to withdraw from the programme and where required offer reasonable support to transfer to another programme at ACM, or to another provider.
3.2 Closure of an individual programme
3.2.1 In the event that it is necessary to suspend or close a course and where there is a material impact on students, the effect will be mitigated by:
- communication with current students to provide assurance that they will not be adversely affected by the decision and provide assurance that they are able to complete their studies at the institution;
- consultation with stakeholders who may be affected to ensure appropriate equality impact assessments will also be undertaken;
- future applicants will be notified in accordance with UCAS deadlines, allowing time for students to source alternative suitable programme (where relevant) at ACM.
3.3 Closure of a specific site or campus
3.3.1 Where ACM has no option, other than to close a specific building, site or campus, the following measures will be considered:
- where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner over a period that would enable current students to complete their studies at the original campus location the student has selected. If a single or multiple building(s) close within a campus location, efforts will be made to ensure the same level of equipment and facilities are available across the remaining buildings at a campus location where possible.
- where it is not possible to continue operating in a transitional manner, in supporting students to transfer to appropriate programmes within the ACM portfolio at a different campus location, or at other suitable providers, and (where appropriate financially) by compensating students where, because of disruption to their studies, they suffer demonstrable, material financial loss.3.3.2 Where part of a campus is rendered unusable for activities involving students, ACM will typically consider the following measures:
- relocating provision to an alternative location, this may include hiring spaces for programme delivery (where possible nearby) and /or installing temporary buildings;
- revising timetabling to allow all of the scheduled teaching to take part in the available facilities. This may include timetabling sessions being held outside of normal teaching hours. Where such an approach is taken, appropriate consultation will normally be conducted with stakeholders who may be affected;
- undertaking appropriate equality impact assessment.
3.4 Withdrawal or non-renewal of validation
3.4.1 In the event of withdrawal or non-renewal of validation ACM will take all reasonable steps to minimise the resulting disruption to students by, for example:
- working with the validating partner to allow enrolled students to complete their programme at their existing campus location through a ‘teach-out’ arrangement;
- working with a new university partner to provide validation of the programme, or comparable programme;
- where either of the above is not possible, supporting students to transfer to programmes at other providers and, where appropriate, financially compensating students where they suffer demonstrable, material financial loss because of disruption to their studies.
3.5 Institutional closure
3.5.1 Where ACM has no option, other than full institutional closure, the following measures will be considered in the following order:
- where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner over a period that would enable current students to complete their studies at the institution;
- where possible, continue operating in a transitional manner until the end of the current academic year that would enable students to complete their studies or gain an exit award. During this transition period, efforts will be made to find a credible buyer to take ownership of ACM Guildford Ltd and its subsidiaries.
- If a credible buyer cannot be found that will enable continuity of the student experience, ACM will enable the validating institution (if under validation arrangements) to continue teaching students on existing programmes at ACM sites, or a suitable alternative location. To achieve this ACM will ensure student data, programme information and materials, staff (as appropriate), facilities and resources (where possible) and forthcoming tuition fee income are made available to the validating institution.
- If the validating institution is not able to undertake delivery itself, or if ACM is not in a validation partnership at the time of institutional closure, or it is not possible to continue operating in a transitional manner, ACM or the validating institution will support students to transfer to appropriate programmes at other suitable providers.
- where is it not possible for students to continue studying in a transitional manner with ACM, its validating institution, or a suitable alternative provider, ACM will seek to compensate students for tuition fees pertaining to outstanding credits at the point of institutional closure, if possible, within the boundaries of the administration process
3.6 Loss of key staff
3.6.1 Where possible ACM will:
- Seek to fill gaps as quickly as possible, by moving other current members of staff with appropriate skills and experience, into the vacant post(s) or recruiting externally, to avoid disruption;
- Where ACM cannot avoid closing a programme, due to loss of key staff, the policy as outlined in section 3.2 will apply.
- Information about the policy in place to refund tuition fees and other relevant costs to your students and to provide compensation where necessary in the event that you are no longer able to preserve continuity.
4.1 Information regarding Refunds and Compensation Policy is made available to prospective students and applicants via ACM’s website (www.acm.ac.uk/policies/) as well as included within ACM’s internal assets, such as the student-facing virtual learning environment. The policy is subject to a cyclical period of review, to align with the review and update of all ACM’s policies and procedures, ensuring consistency and alignment with current practice.
- Information about how ACM will communicate with students about the student protection plan
5.1 Students will be provided access to the Student Protection Plan via the public website and the student portal.
5.2 Students have representation within the committee structure in which we would normally expect activity likely to impact on student experience and their programme of study to be discussed.
5.3 Should the protection plan need to be implemented students will be contacted by a member of the senior management team at the earliest opportunity following a decision that an applicable change was decided upon or notified to the institution.
5.4 ACM will take reasonable steps to avoid implementing change during an academic year or making changes close to the start of an academic year.
5.5 ACM will undertake to update the website and presence on UCAS and other institutional listing services at the earliest opportunity on notification of a significant change.
- Student involvement in the review of the plan
6.1 Students will have the opportunity to contribute to a review of the plan (including the Refunds and Compensation policy) to ensure that their views, interests and needs are taken into account.
6.2 The plan will be reviewed annually, with student involvement, before its publication for students enrolled on the 2025/26 academic year.
6.3 Student engagement in the review will be undertaken through the formal student voice meetings on an annual basis. The meetings have student representatives from across all programmes and sites.
6.4 Where variations to the plan take place in-year, students will be able to view the revised plan once a version has been approved by the regulator.
- Complaints
7.1 Students who are dissatisfied with ACM may wish to make use of ACM’s complaints and grievances procedure. ACM seeks to resolve all complaints and grievances in a timely manner through considered escalation of concerns as outlined in ACM’s Complaints and Grievances procedure, which is available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/
- POLICY SCOPE
8.1 The policy applies to ACM Guildford Ltd campuses (Guildford, Birmingham and London) registered with the OfS on Middlesex University validated higher education programmes and students, staff, applicants, associate members, visitors and contractors connected to those campuses and those programmes.
- RELATED POLICIES
9.1 ACM Refunds and Compensation Policy is available at www.acm.ac.uk/policies/
- POLICY OWNER
10.1 This Policy is under the responsibility of the Senior Management Team. The responsible committee will ensure the cyclical review of this Policy is carried out under ACM’s Quality Assurance Framework.
10.2 Decisions and appropriate actions in support of the implementation of the Policy will be authorised by the Accountable Officer.
- DOCUMENT HISTORY AND NEXT REVIEW Version: 1.7
Version: 1.7
Approved on: 10 September 2025
Approved by: Senior Management Team
Download this policy here: ACM Student Protection Plan




